Walter Breen
sliderider
Posts: 1,834
Someone mentioned Walter Breen in another thread recently and I tried to look up some info about him. About all I could find was related to his coin encyclopedia and his pedophile conviction, but nothing else. I found one piece with a rather humorous line in it.
<<Walter Breen, born 1930, known as W. J. Brilling and J. Z. Eglinton, was another overlooked Gay genius who died largely unnoticed.>>
Overlooked gay genius?? If this is kind of person that the gay community reveres, then we better think twice about gay rights in this country.
Link to article
<<Walter Breen, born 1930, known as W. J. Brilling and J. Z. Eglinton, was another overlooked Gay genius who died largely unnoticed.>>
Overlooked gay genius?? If this is kind of person that the gay community reveres, then we better think twice about gay rights in this country.
Link to article
0
Comments
<< <i>If this is kind of person that the gay community reveres, then we better think twice about gay rights in this country. >>
Perhaps you might "think twice" before making such a wide, presumptuous and potentially insulting comment board members may find offensive, and oh.. OFF TOPIC. Unless, of course, you simply don't care.
The other night I log on and there is a pornography thread, today this OT nonsense.
sliderider earlier today - "The thing is, though, that I am legitimately interested in the threads that I post in. I don't usually post just for the sake of seeing my PC go up.
BTW PC +1 more. "
Yeah.
Best,
Billy
I must agree magikbilly. Though this board is quite right wing at times, I don't think such statements are appropriate on this board.
<< <i>Though this board is quite right wing at times, I don't think such statements are appropriate on this board. >>
Thanks, Shamika
Billy
sliderider, instead of running this all around the forum again and getting all the members who visit the thread whipped into a frothy OT frenzy, learn how to use the search function. just plug in Breen and sit back and enjoy the read. then come back to this thread and note the similarity of respondents and responses. it'll be enlightening, i'm sure.
al h.
Oh well, the board usually doesn't disappoint.
BTW, post #4000!
The Lincoln cent store:
http://www.lincolncent.com
My numismatic art work:
http://www.cdaughtrey.com
USAF veteran, 1986-1996 :: support our troops - the American way.
<< <i>and here I thought I was going to read something USEFUL... >>
Hi,
yes, me too. That is why I opened it to read this morning.
Best,
Billy
<< <i>This is an OT thread that needs to be moved to the open forum or just plain trashed. >>
Hi,
I agree completely. This was not as surprising as the immature porn photo thread (Ladies??), I just wanna learn about COINS. I wanted to see this type of nonsense post removed as soon as I saw it this morning, but I do not know - to whom you would write to "report" a thread of this nature?
Best,
Billy
Was Breen a genius?
I'd say yes.
Was he overlooked and unnoticed?
Not in the numismatic world. I'd say his name is quite well known in numismatic circles.
(This is my attempt to hijack the thread and turn it back on topic.)
Mike
<< <i>I agree completely. This was not as surprising as the immature porn photo thread (Ladies??), I just wanna learn about COINS. I wanted to see this type of nonsense post removed as soon as I saw it this morning, but I do not know - to whom you would write to "report" a thread of this nature? >>
I mostly agree. I don't mind the occasional OT stuff, but some of the stuff seems like it would be fairly offensive to some people. (And people wonder why there aren't many women in numismatics?) I'm not offended by much of anything personally, but I'm uneasy with seeing some of this stuff as I'm sure others would rather not be subjected to it.
<< <i>Was he overlooked and unnoticed?
Not in the numismatic world. I'd say his name is quite well known in numismatic circles. >>
True. Though even the "numismatic world" differs on whether (a) the value of his work amidst the allegations of making stuff up, and (b) whether or not his personal transgressions are so horrible that it stains his numismatic work.
hey Ziggy
the key word being allegations.
al h.
Jim
Actually, the author of that article seems to be almost approving. And Walter's wife was far more than tolerant. And some of the so-called victims certainly approved. I mention these things, not because I approve of Breen's behavior, but because I think it's important to understand - really understand - that there are countless diverse, wildly divergent and unimaginable perspectives in this world. (Think about it: Some people actually collect sample slabs! )
And to those of you that have a problem with OT threads, I trust you have not read this far.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
When we are planning for posterity, we ought to remember that virtue is not hereditary.
Thomas Paine
As a person he was slime, but he gets no benefit from my use of his research. I will continue to use my Encyclopedia.
<< <i>Yes, he's was a child molestor pig who died in prison. He wrote an encyclopedia of coins which was very useful, but I burned it when I realized what he did and replaced the vacant spot in my library with a hard cover of Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. His pedophelia negated his entire numismatic work and I could not separate the man from the work , >>
Typical establishment kneejerk over reaction. He does something you don't approve of so you condemn EVERYTHING he did.
Au contraire. He apparentely did think it out and very well I might add. His actions are what he could live with of which you apparentely disapprove.
Some are able to forgive and/or forget (?) transgressions while others cannot. I do not say that one is right or the other is wrong. You should do what is right for you.
IMO. Joe.
If you went out to the link provided by Sliderider, and if you believe what the author in the link has to say, then yes, Breen's activities were condoned on a number of levels and in a number of circles. If you ever met Breen, you couldn't help but know that he had some issues. The fact that he was a child molester is abhorrent.
<< <i>Au contraire. He apparentely did think it out and very well I might add. His actions are what he could live with of which you apparentely disapprove. >>
Agreed. While I don't see why the scholarship and the "off-the-field behavior" need to be coupled so tightly that the research should be disregarded if not destroyed, I also can understand how some people can feel that way -- especially if incidents like those involving Breen happened to someone very close to them.
I don't see why the research is suddenly tainted (unless someone shows evidence that his research was obtained through some of his abhorrent activities), but I'm just one person with one opinion.
<< <i>Yes, he's was a child molestor pig who died in prison. He wrote an encyclopedia of coins which was very useful, but I burned it when I realized what he did and replaced the vacant spot in my library with a hard cover of Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. His pedophelia negated his entire numismatic work and I could not separate the man from the work , since he was so involved in the works. He often wore a toga and did not bathe. He was a pervert and I hope he is burning in hell to a crisp, over and over , and over, and over again. Anyone who violates the emotional and physical innocense of children like that, is a demonic vermin. >>
Umm, weren't the book burners in 451 the bad guys? Just kidding If you REALLY know that book you'll know that Bradbury wrote an addition that went on to explain that Beatty had the largest library of all - he just never reads it.
Best,
Billy
PS - I am "done"with this thread. My point was the original midless off-topic post - nothing more. All I have to say about Walter is I wish I still had that crazy pink letter and the 82CC dollar that went with it