Home PCGS Set Registry Forum

Help! What to collect now that I've sold everything!

image
As of 1 hour ago, I finished selling all my coins (except for my commemoratives). I thought my collection was a large accumulation of coins lacking any comprehensive focus. It dawned on me that I couldn't own everything (make that couldn't afford everything) and so I decided to be a serious collector I needed to focus my efforts.

Now that I've liquidated, I don't know what to focus on. I have several thoughts, but am curious as to what "serious" (presuming only serious collectors participate on the Registry board).

I think I want something special, but also something that will marketable when it comes time to sell. I'm looking at devoting 3 to 5 years and spending $10 - $20 K a year. I don't want to focus on any set or series that began after 1964.


Any thoughts???

Comments

  • foodudefoodude Posts: 3,573 ✭✭✭
    MS or PR Franklinsimage

    Or

    MS or Proof V-nickels 65 or higher
    MS $2.5 Indians 64 or higher
    Greg Allen Coins, LLC Show Schedule: https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/573044/our-show-schedule-updated-10-2-16 Authorized dealer for NGC, PCGS, CAC, and QA. Member of PNG, RTT (Founding Platinum Member), FUN, MSNS, and NCBA (formerly ICTA); Life Member of ANA and CSNS. NCBA Board member. "GA3" on CCE.
  • CocoinutCocoinut Posts: 2,512 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Mansco,

    I'm in a similar situation, having a large accumulation various coins (including some complete sets), but I haven't sold anything. I know you had a set of Washingtons (I bought a couple from your set), so I won't recommend those, and while the Merc collectors don't need any more competition for the scarce dates, that's a series for you to consider. You can assemble a very marketable set within the time and budget you mention.

    Other possibilities: Wheat cents (provided you're willing to settle for MS64RD's for some key dates), Buffaloes (without varieties), Standing Liberty quarters (with some non-FH's), FBL Franklins, Peace dollars, and Indian $2½ gold. There are lots of series where you could assemble sets of proofs, such as Barber dimes, Lincolns from 1909-2004, Buffaloes, or cameos of all denominations from 1950-1964. If you tend to get bored with just a single series, a type set would be a good choice.

    Let us know what you decide.

    Jim

    Countdown to completion of my Mercury Set: 1 coin. My growing Lincoln Set: Finally completed!
  • Thanks Jim,

    I wish I had hung onto the Washington set for another year, but...

    part of what I sold included a near complete Morgan set, 90% complete Type 3 Liberty Double eagle set, a Franklin set, begins of a type set (mostly 20th century stuff), Kennedys, Ikes, and Roosevelts. If concluded that there is too much competition for the post 1964 modern stuff. I'm thinking about Mercs, Walking halves, and Standing quarters, but after the Morgan and Washington's, I'm afraid I'll have a nice set going only to be frustrated that the keys won't equal the rest of the set.

    I've owned a near complete type set in the past...it was raw and mostly circulated. I'm thinking about something from the 1800's (1700's) too, but I probably could only afford an XF set at most. I'm thinking some ante bellum (pre-Civil War) coinage would be fun, probably in the form of a type set or a short series would be an exciting hunt. But before I do anything, I'm going to have to satisfy myself that when it comes time to sell it will be liquid and able to at least hold its value.

    If you have any further thoughts, I'd love to hear them.

    Mansco
  • pursuitoflibertypursuitofliberty Posts: 7,039 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Mansco,

    Here's my two cents ... you kept the commemoratives and sold off the accumulation that lacked focus. I think you enjoy different designs. Sounds like you love coins.

    With a fair budget and a dedication to the pursuit, why not consider an impressive U.S. type/major variety set ... maybe focus on the 19th Century first ... with an eye out for 18th Century pieces ... something really worthwhile. Better dates, spectacular pieces for the grade.

    Oh, and don't kid yourself on the registry. A lot of serious collectors do not participate, and a some not so serious ones do.

    Good luck, what ever it turns out to be.




    “We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”

    Todd - BHNC #242
  • gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thats a hard question to answer,im also in the same boat,after liquidating my mercs,I just cannot seem to find
    a series that realy gets my intrest enough to collect the full series,I do buy here and there ,But I belive it's out of bordum,
    A few mercs,bust halfs,and quarters.....Maybe im just burned out and need a long break?
    Al
  • rainbowroosierainbowroosie Posts: 4,875 ✭✭✭✭
    20th century type set high MS, or a lark -- a toned set of Washington proofs 36-64. Color rocks!!image
    "You keep your 1804 dollar and 1822 half eagle -- give me rainbow roosies in MS68."
    rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,234 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1970 (or 1971 possibly) and earlier cameo/deep cameo proof and special mint set coins; 1947-1958 mint sets; Cameo Proof/proof type set from 1970 back in time as far as you and your wallet can go.
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,701 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>...concluded that there is too much competition for the post 1964 modern stuff. >>



    No one should collect anything they don't enjoy or find exciting but If your only
    problem with the moderns is that you think there's too much competition then
    you shpould look at these again. Certainly there are a large number of registry
    sets but this is largely just that these are the least expensive sets to assemble
    and there are a lot more collectors of modest means than there are wealthy col-
    lectors. This is really the gratest strenght of the moderns, that meaningfull sets
    can be assembled on a shoestring. Indeed, important sets can even be assemb-
    led from circulation. While there are huge numbers of collectors who compete for
    the entire surviving populations of all the most desirable classics, most modern
    collectors are either not yet extremely knowledgeable about coins or are content
    with the nicest coin they find in circulation or the first coin they see in a mint set.
    There are not a lot of people assembling attractive unc sets of the moderns. As in-
    dication of this just watch the price of a coin like the '82-P quarter in nice choice BU.
    While there are only a several thousand of these in existence they can be found for
    as little as seven or eight dollars and some price guides list them as low as a couple
    dollars. Until this year the Red Book listed this coin for $6 in gem!!!

    Moderns are still the area where you'll find the least competition (even less than ul-
    tra moderns). If you like these coin now is the time to acquire them.
    Tempus fugit.
  • Thanks guys for the comments. Please keep them coming. I didn't really explain my aversions to commons. I've collected many of them, actually eveything from the 1930's to now except Lincoln cents and Jefferson nickels. Instead of competition, what I really meant is there are a lot of collectors focusing on them and my personal belief is that the prices are more expensive for some of the coins than I want to put in them. A couple of examples. I've seen several coins from the 60's, 70's and 80's that have high mintages and low certified populations for better than gem mint specimens resulting in the prices being bid up. While the law of supply and demand is clearly at work, I (just my personal feelings) don't want to several hundreds of dollars for an MS67 when the MS 66 costs $40. Don't get me wrong, pursuit of such sets is fine. I just think I'd have more satisfaction owning a 179X dollar now.


    I think pursuitofliberty's comments are close to where I'm headed. But I guess I'm trying to get a sense of how popular that course seems to be. In any case, I'm only looking for PCGS graded specimens.

    I hope I get more thoughtful comments over the few days.

    Thanks again!
  • imageI Recommend That You Reconsider Your Decision.
    Getting In On The Ground Floor With Any Series Is A Win-Win
    Situation !!
    Now That Washington Quarters Have Taken Off, They Are No Longer Affordable For The Average Collector !! The Same Was True For FBL Franklin Halves !!
    Right Now, Ike Dollars, Full Step Jeffs, And Full Torch Roosevelts
    Are A Great Buy, Very Difficult In High Grades, And Sure To Appreciate In Value !!!!!
    The Same Is True In The Bullion Market. Buying Gold For $ 350.00 Per Ounce Is Much Better, Than Waiting For It To Hit $ 800.00,
    Then Going Out To Buy, Like Everyone Did In 1979-1980 !!
  • boiler78boiler78 Posts: 3,062 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Another typeset seems like a logical fit for you. You kept the commems so you must like the variety that the different designs provide. When I look at the sets that I have worked on over the years they all have one thing in common....... with the exception of the different dates they all look exactly alike. In fact the emphasis is on matched sets so they tend to be visually boring.

    You might consider mint state and/or proof typesets from 1858-1963 in 63 or better. When you finish that set it will definitely be visually appealing.image

    Good luck and happy hunting,

    Mark
  • TypetoneTypetone Posts: 1,621 ✭✭
    I enjoyed putting together a U.S. major design (no gold) typeset. Maybe you want to consider that set. The set has 39 coins, and so is finishable in your price range. Or, there is a parallel with gold set. And, it is a set that can be upgraded for a long time if you choose.

    Greg
  • Walking Liberties have seen a nice rise in the past few years.
  • saintgurusaintguru Posts: 7,724 ✭✭✭
    SAINTS, BRO, SAINTS!!

    Get one of these to start...1909 MS66!!!

    imageimage

    imageimageimageimage
    image
  • cosmicdebriscosmicdebris Posts: 12,332 ✭✭✭
    Bill

    image

    09/07/2006
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭
    eye appealing cameo type coins proof 63 64 65 1860 to 1915 silver copper copper nickel

    indian head cent in proof copper nickel proof 64 and bronze a nice proof 65 rb

    two cent piece proof 65 rb

    matte prooflincoln only buy a proof red coin proof 65 1909 a sexy date too

    three cent piece nickel proof 65 66 cameo three cent silver type three proof 64 65 cameo

    shield and liberty nickel proof 66 cameo

    half dime proof 65 66 cameo

    seated dime proof 66 cameo

    twenty cent piece proof 64 cameo

    seated quarter proof 64 65 cameo

    seated half dollar proof 64 65 cameo

    seated dollar proof 64 cameo
    morgan dollar proof 65 cameo
    trade dollar proof 64 cameo

    barber dime proof 65 cameo

    barber quarter proof 65 64 cameo
    barber half proof 64 cameo

    this would be a start

    you could do others or a sub type set within a set but this would be a tremendous divirsification and a gopod staret of beautiful undervalued collectible sleeper coins with scarcity especially so in eye appealiing hand picked coins


    michael
  • I've done the Saints. Impossible to complete on my budget...so I liquidated them earlier this year.
  • image Civil War, Or Hard Time Tokens Are Another Area. Especially
    If You Want Something That Is Very Collectible.
    Also Most Of These Are Still Very Affordable, And Have A lot Of History To Boot !!
  • merz2merz2 Posts: 2,474
    I also believe the 19th century type set would be the way to go.I myself have been toying with the idea of all 1899's.I haven't looked into it that closely but pick a year and get them all in that year.image
    Don
    Registry 1909-1958 Proof Lincolns
  • PQpeacePQpeace Posts: 4,799 ✭✭✭
    Mercs or Peace Dollars image
    Larry Shapiro Rare Coins - LSRC
    POB 854
    Temecula CA 92593
    310-541-7222 office
    310-710-2869 cell
    www.LSRarecoins.com
    Larry@LSRarecoins.com

    PCGS Las Vegas June 24-26
    Baltimore July 14-17
    Chicago August 11-15
  • I also am getting rid of most of my collection to better focus on what I really like. I have collected (Accumulated) coins for over 20 years buying whatever striked my fancy.

    Within the last 2 years I started getting serious about my type collection and my early commemorative's. (I like the variety, I started to get bored collecting coins that all look alike). It took me over 20 years to finally decide what to collect with a purpose in mind.

    All the money that I get from the sale of my accumulation coins are going into those two focus areas. My type coins are all PCGS and my early Commem's are raw.

    I am now officially a collector and not an accumulator....image
    image

    My daughter was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of 2 (2003). My son was diagnosed with Type 1 when he was 17 on December 31, 2009. We were stunned that another child of ours had been diagnosed. Please, if you don't have a favorite charity, consider giving to the JDRF (Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation)

    JDRF Donation
  • BigEBigE Posts: 6,949 ✭✭✭
    mansco, just stick to Commems and buy more!----------------BigE
    I'm glad I am a Tree
  • PQpeacePQpeace Posts: 4,799 ✭✭✭
    The 50 piece commem set looks pretty easy to complete..
    How much are 67-68 coins ??
    What would it take to complete a top set ?
    BigE ??
    lARRY
    Larry Shapiro Rare Coins - LSRC
    POB 854
    Temecula CA 92593
    310-541-7222 office
    310-710-2869 cell
    www.LSRarecoins.com
    Larry@LSRarecoins.com

    PCGS Las Vegas June 24-26
    Baltimore July 14-17
    Chicago August 11-15
  • BigEBigE Posts: 6,949 ✭✭✭
    Larry, 67-68 coins are all over the boards depending on color and particular type, quite similar to silver dollars. I have been working on 50 piece and 144 piece sets for 5 years and I seem to always be around 10-12th place in the registry on both sets. Scher has the top 50 piece set and I would venture a guess at 400K+or-100kimage I know mansco has had his commems for some time nowimage-------------------------BigE
    I'm glad I am a Tree
  • Commems definitely continue to be a major interest and will probably continue to be a focal point. What I'm looking at is determining the best value. Do I buy a 1928 Hawaiian in MS 63, Ms64 or hold out until the budget can handle get me an MS65. Ditto for Grant w/ star, Layfayette, and Pan - Pac??
  • ttt
  • WaterSportWaterSport Posts: 6,832 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ok, you read all he sweet stuff, now suck on this. If you’re trying to satisfy some investment need, go elsewhere. I mean, there are dozens of books that say that collecting for investment is dangerous. I just do not support that concept of investment collecting. While I have always said coin collecting beats Pokiman cards, you need to look at where the satisfaction you need is located. It may be new hobby, it may be mountain climbing! But if you got dissatisfied and sold it all once, then I dare say, You will do it again, and be just as disappointed, IMO.

    Sorry If I misread you...
    WS
    Proud recipient of the coveted PCGS Forum "You Suck" Award Thursday July 19, 2007 11:33 PM and December 30th, 2011 at 8:50 PM.
  • Hi waterSport,

    Yes, you misread me.

    I set out collecting and having fun. I had plenty of fun. But much of the fun is in the chase. Caught most of what I was after.

    With the Registry, you get the opportunity to compare. I had a Washington Quarter set that was made up of primarily MS66's (except the 32d&s, of course) and I held the number variety spot for about a week, but then MS67's started to predominate most sets. I felt like I had got left at the starting gate. The MS66's were fun and challenging, but I never expected to see so many more sets pass me by so quickly.

    I never said I was quiting collecting. I've added more books to my numismatic library since I sold the collection. While I'm nowhere near Jack Lee as a collector, he too reached a point where he sold and started anew.

    Purpose of the thread was to solicit ideas.

    Okay, what are yours.
  • FairlanemanFairlaneman Posts: 10,424 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hi Mansco

    Your problem of no focus is just the opposite of what I have had for 25 years. Almost entirely Mercury Dimes have been collected. I aim for no focus now so that something about other series can be learned.

    Good Luck with finding something to focus on.

    Ken
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭
    well pre 1915 proof coins a type set nice eye appealling proof 63 64 maybe 65 also ms coins too 63 64 maybe 65

    or some really nice type coins pre 1915 CIRCULATED choice xf au maybe some uncs and as you work your way back to the 1830's maybe choice vf xf going back 1820's 1810 vf fine

    pre 1800 nice vg

    also a nice set of average circ colonial coinage




    best dealers for some/MOST of the above??


    www.markfeldcoins.com mark feld of course


    www.pinnacle-rarities.com todd imhof last on here but not least!!

    also on the pinnacle web site is a section for research and articles all about the above coins and how to start collectinmg them what to watch out for

    all free to read on the site

    and many good advices for collectors wanting value and opportunity for their hard earned dollars

    -------------------------
    Posts are based on experience and are opinion only. Experiences and opinions of others may differ.
  • jpkinlajpkinla Posts: 822 ✭✭✭
    Mansco,

    I would suggest you collect $2 1/2 Indians (15 coins) or for a real challenge $5 Indians (24 coins)....You can set the grade you want to buy and they are very challenging particularly in higher grades.....The sets can be completed with some effort and money but they are not easy.......

    $10 Indians and Saints can get very expensive very fast....
  • cmanbbcmanbb Posts: 1,059 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A Draped Bust Half Set (1801-1807) would be fun, will be a challenge, can be completed. I think a nice XF45-AU58 set would be a nice accomplishment. Once that set was complete you can think about upgrading the set....................or start something else.

    Draped Bust Dimes (1798-1807) another cool series

    THE set to complete (imo) would be the Early Dollars (1795-1803) Choice XF45..................now that would be FUNimage
  • mansco, I to just got done decollecting my set ( thanks to a few board members ) but unlike you I did this to focus on my Kennedy and Type set. I have had a blast doing my 20th cent. Type set and doing a nice Kennedy Set on a budget can be done . You can still do nice sets on budgets with out killing your self. As for the one thats sound good for you I would say do a Type set there are a bunch to pick from.
    U S Navy Retired 22 years - ENC(SW) Ret. - Travling Nuclear Maintanence Contractor - Working Indian Point Nuclear plant Buchanan New York
    image

    ">Franklin Halves
    ">Kennedy Halves
  • STEWARTBLAYNUMISSTEWARTBLAYNUMIS Posts: 2,697 ✭✭✭✭
    Matte Proof Lincoln Cents in full Red 1909 - 1916 Proof 65 and better
    They are very under valued.

    Stewart
  • WaterSportWaterSport Posts: 6,832 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Ok, I would have to say Lincolns, and like Stewart, that includes any proofs. Why, 2009 is coming. If you think they are hard to find now, wait tell then when everyone starts collecting them because the mint changes or drops them. I think the difference in what you experienced with the Washington’s will happen, again, only there will not be a Bunch of MS 67s floating around to bump your set down. In fact, the competition as it exists, usually is why people give up before the sets are ever completed. This very challenge may help you the never ending “hunt” that we all enjoy.
    WS
    Proud recipient of the coveted PCGS Forum "You Suck" Award Thursday July 19, 2007 11:33 PM and December 30th, 2011 at 8:50 PM.
  • gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    THE set to complete (imo) would be the Early Dollars (1795-1803) Choice XF45..................now that would be FUN

    I have to agree.If your going to go for it,go
    for it big.And dont forget the 1794image.

    Al
  • Seems like a lot of folks have the same problem of what to collect.

    I completed a Morgan Dollar set (w/ varieties) then moved onto Large Cents. I have a real nice Morgan set of which all coins are PCGS slabbed. The majority of Large Cents are PCGS, some ANACS and NGC. Love large cents but tough to find decent varieties without killing myself financially especially early dates.

    Current problem is that both are getting very expensive to upgrade or complete (large cents). So I too have been looking in another direction for collections. Something that will hold my interest but not break me.

    I am leaning toward Standing Liberty Quarters, Lincoln Cents (Wheaties) or Buffalo Nickels. Would love to go after Barbers but too expensive as well.

    Good luck on your decision.
Sign In or Register to comment.