Insanity and an ugly coin
sliderider
Posts: 1,834
Ugliest toning you'll ever see
THis is a pop. 183/1 coin trending for $75 at Coin Universe. I bid $76 for it myself, for the MS67 grade for my registry set. With 183 known, it's not like it's hard to get in this grade and surely the others MUST have much more eye appeal. Why do you suppose this person (I say 'person' but am thinking something else) would possibly want to pay so much for it??
THis is a pop. 183/1 coin trending for $75 at Coin Universe. I bid $76 for it myself, for the MS67 grade for my registry set. With 183 known, it's not like it's hard to get in this grade and surely the others MUST have much more eye appeal. Why do you suppose this person (I say 'person' but am thinking something else) would possibly want to pay so much for it??
0
Comments
Ken
New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.
<< <i>Ugliest toning you'll ever see
THis is a pop. 183/1 coin trending for $75 at Coin Universe. I bid $76 for it myself, for the MS67 grade for my registry set. With 183 known, it's not like it's hard to get in this grade and surely the others MUST have much more eye appeal. Why do you suppose this person (I say 'person' but am thinking something else) would possibly want to pay so much for it?? >>
"Ugliest toning you'll ever see."
"I bid on it myself for the MS67 grade for my Registry set."
-That's an interesting buying strategy. You'll buy an ugly coin for the plastic, essentially. I think you're the first to admit that! Cudos to you for doing so.
peacockcoins
Might I add that PCGS thought so as well.
Still, what you write is interesting in that it gives one pause to think about what kind of effect registry sets may be having on top-grade coins -- and that it even seems to affect what we'll buy. When we call a coin "ugly" but want it anyway for registry purposes, well...
Jim
got out bid. I believe the coin was on eBay before and did not sell. It was owned
by a board member and was offered to the board in the past too. This time was
the right time and right place and two people wanted it. Without the color the
coin is a $40 at best.
Onlyroosies
<< <i>Might I add that PCGS thought so as well. >>
Actually, PCGS gave it's opinion on the grade not whether the coin had eye appeal. IMO the coin is hidious but to each their own.
jom
Jom;
Some people collect coins. Other people collect slabs with pieces of paper in them. The coins come along for the ride.
BTW to me eye appeal is VERY IMPORTANT once you get beyond MS-63. If a coin is not pretty it sure has heck can't be an MS-67 or PR-67 in IMO.
<< <i>I don't like the toning on the coin either. BUT it says "MS-67" on the label so that makes it value to those want to rise in the PCGS Registry.
Some people collect coins. Other people collect slabs with pieces of paper in them. The coins come along for the ride.
BTW to me eye appeal is VERY IMPORTANT once you get beyond MS-63. If a coin is not pretty it sure has heck can't be an MS-67 or PR-67 in IMO. >>
Well said, this whole registry thing has become a slab thing and not a coin thing.
A coin like that may go in a registry set, but not in any coin as opposed to slab collecters set!!!
JMHO!!!
edited to add; I would much rather have a 63 with eye appeal in my set!!
I was wondering the same thing. I can sort of understand the registry phenomenom, but why in the world would you really want a coin in your collection that you thought was ugly??
Dan
mcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu">dmcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu