Home U.S. Coin Forum

bwaaahahahaaaaaaaaaaaa

mozeppamozeppa Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭
all this for one cent?image

The only thing that I could think of on how it got this way was probably a San Francisco Mint worker stuck the obverse planchet in the collar in 1925, struck it, then--in 1929--brought it over to the Philadelphia Mint and struck the reverse. Some might say that this is a "magician's coin" but--I've never seen one this old AND--magician's coins are struck cleaner and not rotated.


yeah.....right!image

Comments

  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭
    From the description -- so funny that I had to repeat it and bold-face it: The only thing that I could think of on how it got this way was probably a San Francisco Mint worker stuck the obverse planchet in the collar in 1925, struck it, then--in 1929--brought it over to the Philadelphia Mint and struck the reverse. Some might say that this is a "magician's coin" but--I've never seen one this old AND--magician's coins are struck cleaner and not rotated.

    image

    [EDITED to add: Oh, and this is sad. There *is* one bidder for this coin at $5, and look at where much of their recent feedback came from... ]
  • FatManFatMan Posts: 8,977
    A member of the Fly-In club. I am sure he is making his fellow members very proud.image
  • ldhairldhair Posts: 7,232 ✭✭✭✭✭
    So lets see. The mint worker didn't use a rev. die both times.
    Wonder how that works.image
    Larry

  • nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    Anyone ever notice that most ebay coin sellers use some slight variant of this image?

    image

    Whoever did it first should get a royalty.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file