Home U.S. Coin Forum

Toning question

At our recent coin show, a dealer had about 10 proof Jefferson's (mostly from the 60's) that were toned DEEP purple and blue. I could not believe how dark and colorful they were. They were all NGC. What would have toned them so evenly and colorful? I wanted to buy one but every time I went by the table, the dealer was either AWOL or busy with someone else.

Comments

  • MyqqyMyqqy Posts: 9,777
    Many of the proof jeffersons from the 60's have that uniform, deep toning. Others with a more scientific background could explain better, but the nickel composition and the cellophane material reacted well together and would often times produce very nice blues, golds, light purples, etc....
    image
    My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable !
  • CrackoutCrackout Posts: 1,368 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think it is simply the cello packaging.

    image
  • darktonedarktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
    Crackout your coin is the typical proof set toned nickel. I think the colors edsiajb talks about are those AT looking ones that they say PCGS won't certify anymore? mike
  • Yes...they were very dark. I wondered if they might have been AT but I didn't think they would have been certified NGC if so.
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 23,974 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Yes...they were very dark. I wondered if they might have been AT but I didn't think they would have been certified NGC if so. >>

    did it look like this one? http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=41088&item=3923757699

    If so, I don't believe PCGS nor NGC are grading those anymore and haven't been for a few months now.

    peacockcoins



  • << <i>

    << <i>Yes...they were very dark. I wondered if they might have been AT but I didn't think they would have been certified NGC if so. >>

    did it look like this one? http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=41088&item=3923757699

    If so, I don't believe PCGS nor NGC are grading those anymore and haven't been for a few months now. >>



    YES! They were just like that and darker. So I should assume these are AT, right?
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 23,974 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>Yes...they were very dark. I wondered if they might have been AT but I didn't think they would have been certified NGC if so. >>

    did it look like this one? http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=41088&item=3923757699 If so, I don't believe PCGS nor NGC are grading those anymore and haven't been for a few months now. >>

    YES! They were just like that and darker. So I should assume these are AT, right? >>

    No. Some are legit. It takes 10X to spot the fakes.

    peacockcoins

  • XpipedreamRXpipedreamR Posts: 8,059 ✭✭
    What would you see under magnification that would indicate AT?
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 23,974 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>What would you see under magnification that would indicate AT? >>

    A hint of speckled crustiness, for the lack of a better term. The real ones have smooth, even color that blends INTO the proof surfaces.

    peacockcoins

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file