Toned Walker: Guess the Grade

Options
image
Ed

Comments

  • Goober
    Goober Posts: 980 ✭✭✭
    Options
    MS66*
    Prost!

    Why step over the dollar to get to the cent? Because it's a 55DDO.
  • DHeath
    DHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    Options
    MS-67. Beautiful.
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • DHeath
    DHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    Options
    The obverse that is. What's the reverse look like?
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • Ed62
    Ed62 Posts: 857 ✭✭
    Options
    image
    Ed
  • Ed62
    Ed62 Posts: 857 ✭✭
    Options
    OOPS !! Let's try again:


    image
    Ed
  • boiler78
    boiler78 Posts: 3,119 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Hard to tell from an image but my WAG would be 67* Very pretty!
  • Russ
    Russ Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Options
    Either AU58 or MS66.

    Russ, NCNE
  • XpipedreamR
    XpipedreamR Posts: 8,059 ✭✭
    Options


    << <i>Either AU58 or MS66.

    Russ, NCNE >>





    I'll second that!
  • TonedCoinTrader
    TonedCoinTrader Posts: 2,765 ✭✭✭
    Options
    67 and I will give it a Star for ya * image






    Toned Coins for sale @ tonedcointrader.com
  • darktone
    darktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
    Options
    That's an awesome walker! really hard to put a grade on the obverse but the reverse looks MS64. mike image
  • Bikingnut
    Bikingnut Posts: 3,561 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    67?
    US Navy CWO3 retired. 12/81-09/04

    Looking for PCGS AU58 Washington's, 32-63.
  • RooseyFan
    Options
    Definetly a 67 and very nice!!!!

    Butch
  • DHeath
    DHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    Options
    I'll stick with 67.
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • puff
    puff Posts: 1,475
    Options
    image
  • FC57Coins
    FC57Coins Posts: 9,140 ✭
    Options
    MS65* - if you look at the hand it's hardly formed - I don't think either grading service would go above 65 with that weak a strike - the colors are gorgeous - obviously an endroll coin.
  • DHeath
    DHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    Options
    Frank,

    I think it's a technical strong 5, but if it looks anything like it does in those pics, PCGS/NGC would slap that thing in a 67 holder in a heartbeat. The toning HAS to bump that coin. JMO
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • stman
    stman Posts: 11,352 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Amazing folks now guess grades with the "*" as well.image But I guess it's expected because people also count the "*" as part of the populations too. There could be 500 at a certain grade but two thus far with the "*" and they call it a pop2. When many previous ones graded could be worthy. Got to love marketing. And don't get me wrong I have nothing against the designation whatsoever. Just thinking out loud folks.image
    Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
  • Hoot
    Hoot Posts: 867 ✭
    Options
    I have to agree that the weakly struck obverse central devices limit the grade. I think with the bump that it'll go 66 with a likely *star* designation at NGC. Superb coin and one worth owning without hesitation.

    Hoot
    From this hour I ordain myself loos'd of limits and imaginary lines. - Whitman
  • ms70
    ms70 Posts: 13,958 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    65
  • kamehameha00
    Options
    MS-67 image
  • darktone
    darktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
    Options
    Do this many people actually know how to grade high mint state walkers or has everyone seen this coin at ANR? image mike
  • DHeath
    DHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    Options
    Mike what did it grade? Got a link?
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • Ed62
    Ed62 Posts: 857 ✭✭
    Options
    It's a PCGS - MS67.

    And it can be yours - -

    It looks like it got two bumps for the color.
    Ed
  • puff
    Options


    << <i>It's a PCGS - MS67.

    And it can be yours - -

    It looks like it got two bumps for the color. >>



    Here's my 1945-D in PCGS MS67, notice any difference in the quality other than toning?

    image
  • Goober
    Goober Posts: 980 ✭✭✭
    Options
    Your obverse definitely is better struck and defined by looking at the pictures. Toning is definitely more well rounded with better eye appeal.
    Prost!

    Why step over the dollar to get to the cent? Because it's a 55DDO.
  • CarlWohlforth
    Options
    Wow, those are two stunning Walkers! I'd love to have them in hand and compare them both side by side. image
  • DHeath
    DHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    Options
    Man Puff, that's a pretty reverse!
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • puff
    Options


    << <i>Man Puff, that's a pretty reverse! >>



    You should see the coin in person.... This Walker is a very high end coin, and except for acouple of minor ticks would have probably be the 2nd ms68 in the 1945-D Walkers.image
  • Ed62
    Ed62 Posts: 857 ✭✭
    Options
    Puff; Yours wins by a mile -- or at least 2 grading points.
    Ed
  • puff
    Options


    << <i>Puff; Yours wins by a mile -- or at least 2 grading points. >>



    Thanks Ed62.image
  • coinkat
    coinkat Posts: 24,542 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    both coins are attractive but Puff's 67 is clearly better. There are some 45-D coins with great strikes...like the one Puff has...toning...again the one Puff has is tough if not impossible to beat. The other is attractive, but not worthy of a grade higher than 66.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file