Home U.S. Coin Forum

The Toughest Coin in the Eight Piece Gold Type Set

BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,967 ✭✭✭✭✭
Here’s recent acquisition that really turns me on. Yep, it’s “just” an Indian $5 gold in PCGS MS-64.

This is the scarcest coin in the conventional eight piece gold type set in Choice Mint State condition. The fields and the Indian’s cheekbone on the $5 Indian design were the highest points of the coin because of the incuse design. Therefore they were very prone to getting rubbed and to marks. As result a strictly Mint State $5 Indian is a fairly scarce item. Coins in MS-63 are uncommon; MS-64 coins are scarce and pieces that grade MS-65 or 66 are rarities.

The Indian $2.50 coins face a similar situation, but since the coin is smaller and lighter the design is not quite as prone to marks.

imageimage
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?

Comments

  • FC57CoinsFC57Coins Posts: 9,140
    I like the incuse indian quarter and half eagles - they have a rustic/wild west look to them - and I think they're very underrated. You have to really know what you're looking at to collect these - but I think they'd make a fascinating little collection.
  • nice pix !
    better coin !
    image
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,781 ✭✭✭✭
    This is easily my favorite gold coin design. I like it much more than the double eagle.

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • Dennis88Dennis88 Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭
    very image

    Lucky enough I only do the set in AU-58, and I already have the Indian Half Eagleimage

    Dennis
  • relayerrelayer Posts: 10,570

    I did my 8-piece gold set in 64 (with a 65 Saint). And yeah, the $2.50 Indian in 64 is scarce (and expensive)

    I'm still hanging in as #5 in the current finest after a year and a half. Are you coming after me Bill?

    image
    image
    My posts viewed image times
    since 8/1/6
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,967 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No I'm not coming after you, relayer. My set is registered across the street because it is a cross-breed with PCGS and NGC coins. I'm going to go out of my way to turn my NGC coins into PCGS coins, or try to get the MS-63 graded coins that should be MS-64 coins into MS-64 holders because there is not enough upside to make that worth while.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • relayerrelayer Posts: 10,570
    It looks like I'll have to come after you over at NGC. I see you are #5 there.

    I have my PCGS set listed there also, under IndianGold, and I'm #10.

    (Hmmm... For me this may be the best reason for not allowing NGC coins in the PCGS Registry) image

    But I see they have the 12-piece Type set with and without In God We Trust.
    image
    My posts viewed image times
    since 8/1/6
  • msch1manmsch1man Posts: 809 ✭✭✭✭
    If you like gold type coins (like I do image), Bill's registry sets across the street are definitely worth taking the time to look at. Not only are the coins great, but each coin has a picture (both obv/rev) as well as very candid comments about what grade Bill gives the coin. Great Set!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file