The Coinage Act of 1965 made every regular issue coin that the U.S. has issued from 1793 to date legal tender. Interestingly enough the half cents and large cents where not legal tender until then. That along with the fact large cent was too heavy to carry in quantity and the half cent was "a poor man's coin" made those coins unpopular in their day. The 1965 Coinage Act also restored legal tender to the Trade Dollar, which had lost its legal tender status in the second half of the 19th century.
My guess would be that the 1792 half disme has legal tender. It was issued with the standards that were spelled out in the Coinage Act of 1792, which created the underpinnings for our modern monetary system.
I don't think that the 1787 Fugio Cent is legal tender. It was produced by a private contractor for the government before the Coinage Act of 1792. After the coins were delivered it was found that they were under weight, and the government never really embraced them. That's just speculation on my part, however.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
<< <i>My guess would be that the 1792 half disme has legal tender. It was issued with the standards that were spelled out in the Coinage Act of 1792, which created the underpinnings for our modern monetary system. >>
Don't think so. I believe they are patterns, and not minted for circulation. They circulated yes, but weren't intendend to do.
<< <i>My guess would be that the 1792 half disme has legal tender. It was issued with the standards that were spelled out in the Coinage Act of 1792, which created the underpinnings for our modern monetary system. >>
Don't think so. I believe they are patterns, and not minted for circulation. They circulated yes, but weren't intendend to do.
Dennis >>
There has always been a debate on this one. George Washington in his annual message to Congress called the 1792 half disme "a small beginning in coinage" because there was a need for them. From a technical aspect, you are probably right, but from a practical aspect the 1792 half dismes were the first coins produced under standards set out by the 1792 Coinage Act, which circulated to a great degree.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Comments
I hate it when you see my post before I can edit the spelling.
Always looking for nice type coins
my local dealer
Though spending them would be incredably stupid, as you can buy houses with those things.
My guess would be that the 1792 half disme has legal tender. It was issued with the standards that were spelled out in the Coinage Act of 1792, which created the underpinnings for our modern monetary system.
I don't think that the 1787 Fugio Cent is legal tender. It was produced by a private contractor for the government before the Coinage Act of 1792. After the coins were delivered it was found that they were under weight, and the government never really embraced them. That's just speculation on my part, however.
<< <i>My guess would be that the 1792 half disme has legal tender. It was issued with the standards that were spelled out in the Coinage Act of 1792, which created the underpinnings for our modern monetary system.
>>
Don't think so. I believe they are patterns, and not minted for circulation. They circulated yes, but weren't intendend to do.
Dennis
Like VOC Numismatics on facebook
<< <i>
<< <i>My guess would be that the 1792 half disme has legal tender. It was issued with the standards that were spelled out in the Coinage Act of 1792, which created the underpinnings for our modern monetary system.
>>
Don't think so. I believe they are patterns, and not minted for circulation. They circulated yes, but weren't intendend to do.
Dennis >>
There has always been a debate on this one. George Washington in his annual message to Congress called the 1792 half disme "a small beginning in coinage" because there was a need for them. From a technical aspect, you are probably right, but from a practical aspect the 1792 half dismes were the first coins produced under standards set out by the 1792 Coinage Act, which circulated to a great degree.