Home PCGS Set Registry Forum
Options

poll - how many proof sets & mint sets,do you think has been open up ,in the last year!

i think its been a whole lot!! maybe 100,000 sets or more.
and that is why the pop has gone up so much.

Comments

  • Options
    GRANDAMGRANDAM Posts: 8,376 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just a guess,,,,,, but I would say "A WHOLE BIG BUNCH"

    GrandAm image
    GrandAm :)
  • Options
    LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Does that make the one's I've collected worth more? Or should they join the slab world?
  • Options
    StratStrat Posts: 612 ✭✭✭
    I've been tracking the PCGS and NGC pop reports for proof half dollars from 1955 to 1976, and have found that the certified populations haven't made much of a dent when compared to the original mintage figures. One would want to track the pops for later date proof coinage as well, and perhaps someone has done this, but I for one haven't found the time to do this. I am willing to share the data I have:

    Date Mintage PCGS NGC
    1955 378,200 4421 3757
    1956 669,384 7155 5492
    1957 1,247,952 5327 4534
    1958 875,652 3476 2998
    1959 1,149,291 4151 3354
    1960 1,691,602 5274 4528
    1961 3,028,244 7976 6839
    1962 3,218,019 11,699 10,030
    1963 3,075,645 10,745 9226
    1964 3,950,762 11,393 7986
    1968 3,041,506 2627 585
    1969 2,934,631 3750 929
    1970 2,632,810 2650 822
    1971 3,220,733 1073 350
    1972 3,260,996 1412 336
    1973 2,760,339 1765 257
    1976 cl 4,149,730 4346 506
    1976 sl 3,998,621 4712 1610

    If the numbers aren't readable, just pm me, and I'll forward you a copy of my excel spreadsheet. Keep in
    mind that the above numbers need to be cross referenced with populations from other grading services, particularly ICG and ANACS to be more meaningful. If anyone has a copy of an ANACS pop report, I'd appreciate some data. Also, many coin dealers stock these coins as singles, so getting an idea of how many originial proof sets survive intact is difficult.

  • Options
    fcloudfcloud Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭
    I opened two 1965 sms

    President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay

  • Options
    haletjhaletj Posts: 2,192
    I've probably cut up over 50 mint sets myself.
  • Options
    A profit minded people we are...umm... I say all of them!
  • Options
    cladkingcladking Posts: 28,350 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Millions. It would be a lot more but the supply of these that haven't been destroyed
    is putting constraints on how many can be cut now. This is especially true for the mint
    sets. Large percentages of these have been destroyed over the years.

    Sets are cut by wholesalers to make date and mint sets, they are cut by dealers seeking
    gems for submittal, they are cut by individual collectors to get coins for their sets. Cutting
    of these sets has probably been drifting lower in recent years simply because they are
    getting more difficult to find. To get an idea of the state of the market look at the value
    of the sets in comparison to the combined value of the coins in them. The sets have long
    been more profitable in pieces than intact, but now this spread is widening on many dates.
    This would imply that a shortage of coins for wholesale is developing. There are a few col-
    lectors who desire these sets intact and their numbers are growing. While it's only a few
    thousand people they are about to start bumping heads with those who are destroying the
    sets. When this occurs in the near future you'll see the premium for dismantling the sets
    disappear and become a discount. This will force wholesalers to buy the coins on the open
    market. The number of coins on the market available for sale is far lower than most imagine.
    It should be interesting.

    Some of the areas where it will show up first and is indeed starting to show up is in the very
    low mintage '82 and '83 souvenir sets. Despite their tiny mintages they remain the primary
    source for several of the coins in these sets. This means they have horrendous attrition rates
    as collectors and dealers cut them up for the coins. Already it is becoming typical to see these
    trade at a substantial premium to the value of the coins in the set.

    The regular mint sets which have suffered the highest attrition will be next, but the proof sets
    may not be far behind. There is much more demand for these and when people see the behav-
    ior of the other sets there will probably be a run on them too.
    Tempus fugit.
  • Options
    cladkingcladking Posts: 28,350 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Strat: Interesting statistics, thanks.
    Tempus fugit.
  • Options
    StratStrat Posts: 612 ✭✭✭
    Cladking, thanks for noticing! Whenever I do find an intact, pristine proof set in its original packaging, I put it away, for the reasons you've stated. I'm not into Mint Sets beyond 1958, but can see why so many have been cut up for singles. Wouldn't hurt to save a few.



  • Options
    Dan50Dan50 Posts: 1,809 ✭✭✭
    you can add about 100 opened by me the past year. image
    Dan
  • Options
    GTOsterGTOster Posts: 860 ✭✭✭
    Last count over 300 sets this year for me
    Paul
Sign In or Register to comment.