Home U.S. Coin Forum

Is this a "rare" pcgs slab?

PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
image

Comments

  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,781 ✭✭✭✭
    Is it just me or does that coin look odd?

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Is it just me or does that coin look odd? >>



    Hereit is if your interested in info on the coin.
  • Total BS !
    Proof 70 CAM Restrike circa TODAY !
    worth melt plus 5 bucks !
    image
  • Is it really PCGS??????

    image
    Alex in Alaska
    Collecting Morgans in Any Grade
  • krankykranky Posts: 8,709 ✭✭✭
    It's dropped 50% in value in three years, so I personally wouldn't be in a great hurry to get one.

    New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.

  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    why does everyone get so uptight about someone toning junk silver coins, but nobody EVER gets upset about scams like this crap?

    K S
  • First i have seen,and i am pissed !

    Read the book !

    "Ship of gold in the deep blue sea" very cool !
    image
  • Not to mention "original dies" yeah right !
    image
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,781 ✭✭✭✭
    I have to admit, I'm disappointed to see PCGS would support such a venture. Clearly a departure from the spirit of the hobby.

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • RKKayRKKay Posts: 3,015 ✭✭✭
    Isn't it required by law to have "COPY" somewhere on the coin?
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    Says right on the rev. "Struck September 7, 2001." What more do you need?image
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • bushmaster8bushmaster8 Posts: 5,616
    The only thing "rare" about those pieces of crap is finding a buyer.
    "Wars are really ugly! They're dirty
    and they're cold.
    I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
    Mary






    Best Franklin Website
  • kieferscoinskieferscoins Posts: 10,017
    It is not rare at all.

    Cameron Kiefer
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    rare? no, but imo it IS bull-$#!+,which is not rare at all.

    K S
  • MarkMark Posts: 3,536 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Rick:

    As I recall, these "coins" avoided the "copy" tag because they are not exact duplicates. In particular, each has a struck on date on the reverse, so it's not a copy of the real item.

    At the time these were created, there were many of us who were saddened by the loss of the (old) gold ingots that were sacrificed to make these items. Even though the faces of the ingots were shaved off and saved, nonetheless it was sad to see them melted. I understand that the market was saturated so that it apparently was not possible to sell the ingots. But I would have hoped that the sellers would have been willing to hold onto the ingots and sell them over a period of years. However, it was not to be...sigh.... image

    Mark
    Mark


  • RKKayRKKay Posts: 3,015 ✭✭✭
    Thanks for the info, Mark.
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    it is coin doctoring to the n'th degree!

    ok, ingot doctoring....

    K S
  • Conder101Conder101 Posts: 10,536
    I don't think I would call it "rare", I believe they made some 5,000 of them. I catagorize it as a Novelty slab, not a Production slab. I need one for my reference set but I'm not going to buy one unless I can get it just over melt. Even then, the idea of buying two and a half oz of gold just to get the holder doesn't please me.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file