Nothing new, but worth discussing

It has been discussed in this forum how the American public really does not care to use the $1 coin. It has also been brought up that it is rare to see a 50 cent piece used in normal day-to-day transactions. And for most people the use of a penny is downright frustrating.
So, why do we (meaning the US Government) have any coin in circulation other than the nickel, dime, and quarter? If the coins are rarely used, why mint them?
So, why do we (meaning the US Government) have any coin in circulation other than the nickel, dime, and quarter? If the coins are rarely used, why mint them?
0
Comments
As for the half dollar, perhaps it has something to do with having a large coin to put in Proof and mint sets. There have been a number of years were no JFK half dollars have been for circulation. And since the mint system generates seignorage (the mint profit realized between the cost of making a coin and its face value.) from making these coins, their production shows up as a profit on the government's books even if the coins don't circulate.
I am for a $1 coin, or at least I think I am. I wouldn't want them weighing me down with them, and I do often carry as many as 10 $1 notes. Kinda touchy situation with me. I want them to get rid of the $1 note, but I don't want to have to carry 10 more coins to have the same amount of money...I know, change them to $5 notes, but that's not the point.
The Lincoln cent store:
http://www.lincolncent.com
My numismatic art work:
http://www.cdaughtrey.com
USAF veteran, 1986-1996 :: support our troops - the American way.
Jim
Positive BST Transactions (buyers and sellers): wondercoin, blu62vette, BAJJERFAN, privatecoin, blu62vette, AlanLastufka, privatecoin
#1 1951 Bowman Los Angeles Rams Team Set
#2 1980 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
#8 (and climbing) 1972 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
Make 18 billion cents, create 180 million new dollars to move around like chess pieces.
Sad but I believe it's true.
"I know Americans don't want to use a dollar coin, but they could make it small. Here's an idea. Just like one of Mexico's coins use dual metals. Like an outer silver ring, an inner golden color ring and a hole in the middle. Anyone that confuses this with a quarter is loopy. "
Ahhhhhh, but the devices must portray something American, like maybe a copy of the Constitution with a big crap stain on it.
Jim
<< <i>
Ahhhhhh, but the devices must portray something American, like maybe a copy of the Constitution with a big crap stain on it.
Jim >>
Positive BST Transactions (buyers and sellers): wondercoin, blu62vette, BAJJERFAN, privatecoin, blu62vette, AlanLastufka, privatecoin
#1 1951 Bowman Los Angeles Rams Team Set
#2 1980 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
#8 (and climbing) 1972 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
My theory is that the dollar coin won't circulate as long as there is a dollar bill. The general opinion is that people don't want to carry change. But that's exactly why a dollar coin without a bill WILL work. As soon as you end up with 4 of them in your pocket, you will use them to "lighten the load".
And if we are going to have bills, why not use a more stable product other than paper? There are a lot plastic alternatives available that would make them last longer and not cost that much more to make yet still have the security.
However, major store chains, banks etc. would need to retrofit their cash drawers too in order to get these coins into circulation.
Also, there's probably some sort of higher handling charges for banks to obtain coins vs. paper because of the extra weight.
Seems like as long as it'll cost businesses significant money and inconvenience to convert to serious use of halves and dollars, they'll avoid
doing so. Next time, instead of spending the marketing money on goofy golden dollar ads, maybe the government could use that money to subsidize conversion.
If I got the coins in change, I'd certainly spend them. However, I've yet to receive a golden dollar from any transaction.