Got two submissions graded today!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af2a8/af2a831b2a06b9b375178cea00f943db2cb0d2dc" alt="sumdunce"
Cert #s blanked on purpose.
First submission is economy crossovers:
LINE # CERT # COIN DATE DENOMINATION VARIETY COUNTRY GRADE
1 215XXXXX 1954 1C USA DNC *****Must have qualified as RB instead of RD
2 215XXXXX 1954-S 1C USA MS66RD *****"BIE" Variety not noted
3 215XXXXX 1954-S 5C USA MS65 *****Expected 66
4 215XXXXX 1954-S 5C USA MS65 *****Expected 66
5 215XXXXX 1954-S 5C USA MS66 *****As expected
Date Received: 02/20/2004
Date Shipped: 06/07/2004
Second submission is modern economy raw nickels:
LINE # CERT # COIN DATE DENOMINATION VARIETY COUNTRY GRADE
1 215XXXXX 1967 5C USA MS64
1 215XXXXX 1967 5C USA MS63
1 215XXXXX 1967 5C USA MS64
1 215XXXXX 1967 5C USA MS64
1 215XXXXX 1967 5C USA MS65
Date Received: 04/29/2004
Date Shipped: 06/07/2004
The grades of the 1967 nickels has me confused. I had compared the nickels to other late 1960 MS66 nickels and they were as good or better. Also two of the nickels were as close to full steps as I have ever seen on a 1967 Jefferson (I did not believe they would be graded FS, but it would have been quite a suprise if it happened). In fact before I saw these two I really thought the die pressure for the 1967 Jefferson was never high enough to produce a Full Step example. Now I am renewed in my expectation that there existed some (perhaps only a handful) full step 1967 nickels and I hope that some mint state examples still exist.
The 54-S nickel from the first submission and the MS65 1967 nickel will be placed into my collection. I am uncertain what I will do with the others.
First submission is economy crossovers:
LINE # CERT # COIN DATE DENOMINATION VARIETY COUNTRY GRADE
1 215XXXXX 1954 1C USA DNC *****Must have qualified as RB instead of RD
2 215XXXXX 1954-S 1C USA MS66RD *****"BIE" Variety not noted
3 215XXXXX 1954-S 5C USA MS65 *****Expected 66
4 215XXXXX 1954-S 5C USA MS65 *****Expected 66
5 215XXXXX 1954-S 5C USA MS66 *****As expected
Date Received: 02/20/2004
Date Shipped: 06/07/2004
Second submission is modern economy raw nickels:
LINE # CERT # COIN DATE DENOMINATION VARIETY COUNTRY GRADE
1 215XXXXX 1967 5C USA MS64
1 215XXXXX 1967 5C USA MS63
1 215XXXXX 1967 5C USA MS64
1 215XXXXX 1967 5C USA MS64
1 215XXXXX 1967 5C USA MS65
Date Received: 04/29/2004
Date Shipped: 06/07/2004
The grades of the 1967 nickels has me confused. I had compared the nickels to other late 1960 MS66 nickels and they were as good or better. Also two of the nickels were as close to full steps as I have ever seen on a 1967 Jefferson (I did not believe they would be graded FS, but it would have been quite a suprise if it happened). In fact before I saw these two I really thought the die pressure for the 1967 Jefferson was never high enough to produce a Full Step example. Now I am renewed in my expectation that there existed some (perhaps only a handful) full step 1967 nickels and I hope that some mint state examples still exist.
The 54-S nickel from the first submission and the MS65 1967 nickel will be placed into my collection. I am uncertain what I will do with the others.
0
Comments
The grades were very low and no FS!!!!
Glen
Tim
The 1967 MS65 is the coin with the best fields. The two that were near full step came back MS63 and MS64.
The MS66 1954-S is actually the second best (bag marks wise) 1954-S nickel that I submitted. I looked at the portrait and the monticello and the fields. One of the MS65 has about the same amount of portrait ticks and the same amount of monticello ticks and the fields are cleaner than the MS66. However the strike on the MS65 is weak. I believe that this is what kept it from also reaching the coveted MS66. The other 1954-S MS65 I held under a very strong light and rolled the coin clockwise and counter clockwise and noticed a bag mark above the monticello that I did not notice before. It was graded right with the MS65 designation.
Link
<< <i>Does anybody ever send anything minted before 1900 to PCGS anymore. It seems like all I see is Modern submission results???? >>
Every coin I have sent pre-1900 has been body bagged. I'll stick with Mercury Dimes 1916-1945.
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
<< <i>Does anybody ever send anything minted before 1900 to PCGS anymore. It seems like all I see is Modern submission results???? >>
For last quarter's free Coin of the Quarter I sent in an 1875-s 20c piece. I thought is would grade AU-55 and was pleased when it came back AU58.
MS Buffalo
MS 1951
https://www.ebay.com/mys/active