Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Still intact proof sets

What percentage of proof sets do you think are still intact in their original packaging?

Comments

  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    80%.

    al h.image
  • darktonedarktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
    I think it varies from decade to decade. mike
  • Yes, it probably does vary from decade to decade (I'd guess early ones would have fewer intact pieces). Maybe also in years with major varieties (e.g. 1979 or 1981) as unknowledable people might crack them out to submit and see if they have a rarer variety (just a guess)?

    80% seems like it might be high to me -- you see an awful lot of modern proofs sold outside of proof sets.
  • LanLordLanLord Posts: 11,723 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'll bet there's a hell of a lot of 64's missing from their original packaging
  • jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,775 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Actually maybe not, a local dealer has about 60 1964 sets in original packaging including some un-opened.

    jim
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,723 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't have a good feel for the numbers of proof sets busted up but do have
    a few observations. Twenty years ago there would be a couple thousand proof
    sets available at a good sized coin show. Dealers often didn't bring them to
    shows because they were cheap, bulky to haul, and had a limited market. To-
    day one will rarely see more than a few hundred proof sets at most shows.
    Prices are higher and these will sell more readily so it would seem dealers are
    more likely to tote them along. I've seen bag sets of proofs and heard the
    stories about large percentages of a mintage disappearing over a few days.
    Over the years I've found dozens of proofs in circulation including a VG 1968
    quarter.

    I'd guess at least half the 70's era sets have been intentionally dismantled and
    many more have been destroyed by fire and flood. '80's sets are probably a-
    round 30% destroyed and '90's are similar except later sets have greater at-
    trition. '50's are probably more than 75% gone.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    hey now, that 80% still intact was a wild estimate, but let's look at 5 years from 1979-1983. forgiving for my math, there's a total of 18,291,308 complete sets. at 20% broken up, i get a staggering 3,658,261 individual denomination coins floating around out there, and that's just for 5 years around a date that there was a reason to break the sets up, 1979. i believe my wild-hair guess may be high, that there were even less than 20% broken up.

    al h.image
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,723 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I really feel more comfortable talking about mint sets since I've followed them much more
    closely.

    A few more observations- -The roll price for proofs compared to the intact price is dependent
    on the rate at which the sets are being destroyed. When the proof singles are worth more
    than the set it means they aren't being busted up quickly enough, when it is lower then the
    sets are being dismantled fast enough. Most of the time over the last twenty years there
    have been many sets which are worth more as pieces. Recently this effect has been moving into
    later sets and is now very common in the '83 to '93 issues. This alone should imply that sig-
    nificant accumulations are being destroyed. Anytime someone has a lot of sets to move and
    they are worth more as singles there is a very high probability that the sets will be busted.
    Not only do the pieces sell for more, but they can be shopped around for the highest price.

    Most dealers accumulate these sets for only many months or a few years before they have too
    much money tied up in them and sell them all wholesale. Many of these wholesale deals go to
    dealers who bust the sets up. In fact until only recently there were very few buyers of any of
    the modern sets for retail. Retail sales tend to be one or two or maybe a dozen sets to a col-
    lector from a local shop or mail order dealer, but most dealers acquire these in much larger quan-
    tities. It isn't unusual for even small dealers to get $4,000 or $8,000 deals on lifetime accumulations
    of proof sets. Most of these end up at wholesalers, and significant numbers are busted up.

    It's safe to assume that many collectors and others would remove an S-mint clad from circulation.
    These should not usually circulate well and are not usually found with much more than light wear.
    Yet if you look at only 8,000 or so circulating quarters there probably will be a proof in in it. This
    would seem to imply many millions of these have been placed into circulation since proof mintage
    is only around .4% of circulation mintage (and these do not circulate freely).

    Most of the proof singles are in sets and in rolls controlled by speculators or dealers, yet still there
    are large numbers in circulation. Don't forget too, that about 1% of things will be destroyed each
    year in fires, floods, and other mishaps.

    Proof set mintages since the mid-'50's are very high and it's unlikely any will be tough anytime soon,
    but I have to believe that large percentages of many of these dates no longer exist.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • I didn't believe that you could find proofs in circulation, but an amazing thing happened today -- I found a 1999 Connecticut proof quarter in change today (OK, technically my wife found it and asked if I needed it for my Whitman folder, but I was the one who realized it was a proof)! A bit hazy, but definitely a nice find...
  • fishcookerfishcooker Posts: 3,446 ✭✭
    I think 99% are still intact - gifts back in the closet and memento's of a fine day.


    I did get a pretty good stack of 1980's proof Jack's once.
  • 08HALA2008HALA20 Posts: 3,066 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Actually maybe not, a local dealer has about 60 1964 sets in original packaging including some un-opened.

    jim >>



    You better go cherrypick the AH's before Russ finds out where they are.


    image

    Are they here in MA I am starting to like AH's

    Joe
    image
  • 70%......
    PCBUM

    imageimage
  • pontiacinfpontiacinf Posts: 8,915 ✭✭
    its so stagering it makes me feel all woosilyimage
    image

    Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
  • Dan50Dan50 Posts: 1,818 ✭✭✭
    My wife works at a bank, she has brought me many many coins that are turned in as change. Proofs ranging from 5 cents - up to and including proof silver eagles. And many mint rolls in the mint wrappers. Asked me yesterday if I still wanted the rest of the mint rolled Sac's she was holding. I asked how many..She said about $200.00 worth. She says there is probably more there, but that is what she was holding. At $25.00 a roll, beats the mint selling price. image
    Dan
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    I've got one, a 1991.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,773 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'd say that there are alot fewer intact sets than we might think. At a recent Sarasoda, Florida coin show a guy was buying almost every Proof set in sight that dealers would sell for "bid." His business was to buy sets, break them up, and sell the coins in roll form. He even when back to Sarasoda Coin Company's shop where they were holding a reception for other dealers and their customers. There he bought every set that they had in stock, which numbered well over 100 sets.

    A couple things. If he is doing this others must be too. AND one other thing. It's been my experience that run-of-the-mill Proof singles, NOT the really exceptional coins, are among the worst buys that collectors can make. The coins are often not worth what collectors pay for them and never will be at least within the next few years, and the coins have a bad record of "going bad" in the most common albums that collectors use. When they go bad, they often not worth a lot more than face value.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,723 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>... and the coins have a bad record of "going bad" in the most common albums that collectors use. When they go bad, they often not worth a lot more than face value. >>



    It's very true that damaged proofs are almost impossible to sell. Even if you
    have a nice roll of proofs many buyers will reject substandard pieces.

    Many of the proofs in circulation appear to have turned bad which would be
    consistent with collectors spending them rather than retailers or others.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • 62.59%?

    Any percentage you like would be a good answer. Impossible to know.
    How many have been destroyed/lost to fires & floods? Who knows....
    Only thing you can state for sure is that for every year sets were made, the number of sets surviving is lower than what was issued.
    "A happy person is not a person in a certain set of circumstances, but rather a person with a certain set of attitudes"--Hugh Downs
  • grayroadsgrayroads Posts: 211 ✭✭
    The year seems to be the cirtical. One "hot" coin in the set will lead to a majority being broken up.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file