Options
pre 1840 proof halfcents/ proof largecents any interest in them? collect them?
michael
Posts: 9,524 ✭✭
in all the posts on here i have never seen any threads about proof halfcents or proof largecents
pre 1840 or post 1840
does anyone on here collect them?
have an interest in them?
something that is interesting to study??
or any information on these coins
or post a photo of your coins!
michael
pre 1840 or post 1840
does anyone on here collect them?
have an interest in them?
something that is interesting to study??
or any information on these coins
or post a photo of your coins!
michael
0
Comments
I too would like to see a photo if anybody has one.
At 4K and up, these aren't cheap coins. Still, a single piece is within the reach of many.
A complete run of proof-only half cents (1840-48) in 65/66 could be had for 100K or so. Certainly not chump change, but far less expensive and more exciting than many other things one could collect.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
These are tremendously desirable coins, but few of us ever get an opportunity to own one at a reasonable price. I don't know where I'd go to get one, except a high-end early copper specialist, where I'd be paying a high-end retail price.
An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."
Someday a proof half cent or large cent will be mine -- probably post 1840.
I personally don't like them for several reasons:
1. They are legitimately rare, rarer than their value might indicate. Therefor, putting a set together is very difficult.
2. They usually have hairlines or other problems (unattractive toning, re-coloring, etc).
3. I like MS coins better, personal preference.
<< <i>Jim McGuigan has the proofs in his awesome half-cent collection. I've seen some of the early proofs at shows and auctions.
I personally don't like them for several reasons:
1. They are legitimately rare, rarer than their value might indicate. Therefor, putting a set together is very difficult.
2. They usually have hairlines or other problems (unattractive toning, re-coloring, etc).
3. I like MS coins better, personal preference. >>
You are correct, Jim McGuigan has some awesome proofs. There are a couple collectors that do, also.
Your reason #1 is to me a good reason to collect them. The set is very difficult to put together. But if the set was as easy to put together as the second Lincoln book (1941-date), who would care?
An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.