Home U.S. Coin Forum

Jefferson Monster, a gift from eBay!!!!!!!!!

keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
It's still hard to believe that I won the coin at the price I won it at. Just another case of eBay serving up some gems if you search diligently and hold on for the ride!!!!! This was a coin I had hoped to find raw for my set this year but holdered by ANACS for a cross is OK.

To give you a general idea as to the true rarity of the issue, let's take a look at some population numbers. Walter Breen estimates less than 1% of the total 1939 Proof mintage which would place the number at approximately 125 coins. PCGS currently lists 46 in all grades and the only NGC hard-copy I have is from January of 2001 with 19 coins in all grades. If we estimate generously with equal numbers for PCGS/NGC/ANACS, ignore resubmissions and assume equal extant numbers not yet holdered, there are 184 coins. Remember, I said generous!!!

According to Bernard Nagengast in "The Jefferson Nickel Analyst" the variety wasn't discovered and made publicly known until the late 1970's. Bower's and Merena sold a whopping 30 coins at auction in 1985. No speculation is given as to how the 1939 Rev.of 1940 and it's twin the 1940 Rev. of 1938 ocurred, but it seems simple enough to deduce. The 1940 coins all came from a single die that was accidentally used for production early in that year. My hunch is that the 1939 coins are a result of production trials for the newly reworked reverse dies in late 1939.

Al H.image

Comments

  • Nice score.
    www.jaderarecoin.com - Updated 6/8/06. Many new coins added!

    Our eBay auctions - TRUE auctions: start at $0.01, no reserve, 30 day unconditional return privilege & free shipping!
  • OuthaulOuthaul Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice score, Al! Those who say eBay is a dumping ground don't take the time to cherry it. I won THESE last night. Not the most spectacular find on Earth, but pretty cool just the same.

    Let us know how the coin looks in person.

    Cheers,

    Bob
  • Great coin, Al.
    I'm reading the same text from Nagengast that you have relayed.
    It says that error specialist, Tom Miller found one at a coin show in the late 1970's.
    And that this coin is seldom available.
    I'm glad this example has found a home with someone who can truly appreciate it for what it is.
    Congratulations.
    Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?
    Forbid it, Almighty God!
    I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!
    ~PATRICK HENRY~
  • MJPHELANMJPHELAN Posts: 779 ✭✭✭
    Cha-Ching,

    Nice find.

    Mark
    Mark
  • Good deal, Al!

    Even if it only goes PR65 at PCGS, you have done very well! image

    Let us know how it looks, and how it goes at PCGS.

    Ken
  • krankykranky Posts: 8,709 ✭✭✭
    Way to go, keets. It's good to hear that all that diligence pays off once in a while.

    New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.

  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    hey Ken

    that was my thinking though i figured at PR64, how could it be a loser? my hunch is that it isn't as dark as it appears and the color should be better seen angled.

    the auction was really a peculiar on. it had been listed for 1-2 days with my bid riding at the top and then was cancelled. i assumed it was sold but the seller relisted it the next day. though it was seen by many collectors with the counter tally over 300, it would seem those who knew what it was assumed like me that it would sell for much higher. those who weren't aware of the rarity probably assumed $250 was high for a PR66 1939. i resisted asking the seller for a bigger reverse picture or anything else for fear that he would get curious and cancel again. i also thought momentarily of asking if he'd sell off the sight. glad i didn't do that!!!

    ironically, i had been chasing a coin at a different dealers website in the last few weeks, one that he'd had in stock for several months. it was PCGS holdered at PR65 but looked to be a cinch for a one point bump, solid strike and very clean. alas, when we finally were able to talk, it was sold. i'm not one who's given to Divine Intervention and destiny, but hey...................image i feel blessed to have gotten the 1940 and the 1939 Reverses in the space of a few short months.

    to the point of rarity and suspected true populations, does anyone have a guess or informed opinion about it??

    al h.image
  • Any guess by me would just be speculation, but it is a rare coin worth owning in any case!

    Will be interesting to get that one in hand and see how it really looks. I suspect you are right
    about it not being as dark as the scan. The large scan is pixelized and you haven't seen the
    reverse, but it looks to be an original toned coin and clean. It may well turn out to show good
    color, too!

    Good luck, and let us know! image

    Ken
  • HootHoot Posts: 867
    Hi Al - Congrats on your new win! But I thought that you had purchased one of these in the raw that graded PF67? Perhaps I'm thinking of something else. Anyway, I'll bet your coin crosses at grade. Last fall, I crossed an ANACS PF64 to PCGS PF65 in this coin. It's my opinion that there were between 500 and 1000 of these coins minted. Truly a significant rarity in the series. Way to go!image

    image
    image

    Hoot
    From this hour I ordain myself loos'd of limits and imaginary lines. - Whitman
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    hey Hoot

    the coin pictured below is the one you're thinking of. it was the "wrong 40" and did grade PR67. with this one out of the way i'll turn my attention to a 1941 and the two 1942's which are tough without any die polish. ironically, i had located a 1941 that seems to fit that bill but it'll have to wait for a bit. i find 1941 very hard to find gem coins for with the shoulder being very problematic. i'd much rather have a clean PR65 than a slightly die polished PR66-67, so i may have to "save my pennies" (sic) while i hunt!!!

    al h.image

    image
  • That 40 Rev 38 is a sweet coin, for sure!

    I'll trade you a nice PCGS PR65, plus an unattributed PCGS PR66, plus $$$'s for it image
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    hey Ken

    i'll just bet you would, but which one????!!!!image we need to organize a little get-together at this summer's ANA. i know RGL will be there with some of his sweeties!! maybe we can convince that Corso guy to show up.image

    al h.image
  • HootHoot Posts: 867
    Hi Al - That's the one I was thinking of! Great looking coin.

    I know what you mean about finding nice examples of the '41 and '42 proofs. I have not picked up a 41 yet (nor have I found a real nice 40 rev of 40). My 42 is nice and I like my 42-P silver pretty well, but it isn't struck perfectly on the obverse and shows just a hint of die wear on the reverse, even though it grades 67. Some day. Proofs of 39-42 are by far my favorite in the series.

    Are you going to Portland?

    Hoot
    From this hour I ordain myself loos'd of limits and imaginary lines. - Whitman
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    the coin arrived in the mail this afternoon and is more appreciated in hand than the auction listing suggested. there's a wonderful band of color across the lower two-thirds of the obverse with less apparent reverse color, more a faint milky haze growing bright towards the center. i assume that the coin was in a folder or holder of some type for an extended period. a sight disturbance at the jawline tells me that the strike was a litle weak and there are also two almost imperceptible ticks hidden in Jefferson's hair. all six of the steps are fully outlined but there is roundness at the pillars which verifies the weakness of strike. i'd assume the grader will glass the steps to verify the Reverse Type, so he'll see that there is also two planchet flaws there. the fields on both sides are hairline free and smooth. all-in-all i see the coin as a PR66 and crossing, just a nice original coin.

    al h.image
  • image
    JoeCool
    image
  • moosesrmoosesr Posts: 1,966 ✭✭✭
    Nice score Keets! What do you think its true value will be if it crosses to PCGS as 66 or 65?

    Charlieimage
  • pontiacinfpontiacinf Posts: 8,915 ✭✭
    Great score Al, couldnt happen for a nicer guy image
    image

    Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    hey Charlie

    current prices would show a PR66 at $750-$1000 and a PR65 at around $500. what i feel caused some to shy away from this coin was the darkness of the picture and lack of a reverse picture. an accurate image and worded description by one of the better photographers like Russ or greattoning would have piled up the bids. while a picture may not truly be worth a thousand words, it's worth higher bids at eBay!!

    with this coin i might even have the bragging rights on my mentor!!!! image he has a nice set of 1936 Buffalo through 1942 Jefferson proofs in that killer electric blue which is a predominant nickel tone-color. he doesn't have the two varieties, though, or at least he's chosen not to show them to me.

    al h.image
  • RGLRGL Posts: 3,784
    Great score, Al ... I am pleased you landed a nice coin at a great price.image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file