If Im building a type set, is it OK to put a Proof in?
GottaGetCoins
Posts: 207
Even though its not a proof se?
GottaGetCoins
Currently attempting the 12 Coin US Gold Type Set and the 20th Century US Major Coin Type Set. Completed a Franklin Half Proof Set.
Currently attempting the 12 Coin US Gold Type Set and the 20th Century US Major Coin Type Set. Completed a Franklin Half Proof Set.
0
Comments
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
Currently attempting the 12 Coin US Gold Type Set and the 20th Century US Major Coin Type Set. Completed a Franklin Half Proof Set.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
Lincoln Memorial
Jefferson
Rossies (2)
Washingtons (2)
Franklin
Kennedies (2)
IKE
Bicentenials (3)
SBA Dollar
Sac Dollar
State Quarter
Constitution Commem
SAE
How close am I?
Yes, proofs are very acceptable. I'm currently trying to get those ^^^ 19 in proof.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
Isn't an MS type set already flexible enough for you? Geez...
<< <i>the bicentennials and the state quarter are mint state. >>
I thought they were just mint, but...
What about the Merc, the Walker, the 20 cent, and the Morgan? They all look like proofs.
ooops, my mistake, the Ike is not proof either!
the 5 proofs you're missing might be earlier than you think!
(hint: All are 19th century, and one is an 1862 with a mintage of 550
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
the same grade.
As difficult compleating a set has become, I see no reason
why the addition of a proof should be a problem.
It's OK with me
My posts viewed times
since 8/1/6
Not to worry. They,re a toothless debating society.....like the UN. lol
Okay then, One Proof coin can go in but ONLY one. It will represent the one example of a US Proof coin.
Just choose carefully though. hehe
Really I thought a `real` type set would consist of attractive MS examples of each design, but...hey,
your collection, your rules.