My Two Cent Piece registry set so far (images contained herein).
Russ
Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
Just felt like sharing since I finally recently added another coin.
MS62RB
MS62RB
MS62BN
MS64RB
MS65BN
MS63RB
This has been a frustrating set to build. I'm poor, so I've been trying to build it in the MS62 to MS64 range. Believe it or not, it's tough to find some of these coins in that grade range. Anybody have a nice 1866 in that range?
Edited to add grades.
Russ, NCNE
MS62RB
MS62RB
MS62BN
MS64RB
MS65BN
MS63RB
This has been a frustrating set to build. I'm poor, so I've been trying to build it in the MS62 to MS64 range. Believe it or not, it's tough to find some of these coins in that grade range. Anybody have a nice 1866 in that range?
Edited to add grades.
Russ, NCNE
0
Comments
Not sure if I like the '64 or the '69 better
Coin Show Schedules - www.CoinShowDates.com
The Ludlow Brilliant Collection (1938-64)
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
<< <i>Not sure if I like the '64 or the '69 better >>
My favorite of the group is the 1869. Besides the fact that I really like the way it looks, it worked VERY hard to get in to that holder. Bought it as an NGC MS64RB.
Sent in as a crossover with a minimum grade of 63RB - DNC.
Cracked it out and resubmitted it - Bodybag, altered surfaces.
Turned around and submitted it again - MS65BN, POP 1/0!
Russ, NCNE
My Coin Website
My Professional Website
Russ,
Those are some extremely attractive coins. Thank you for sharing them and good job!
Done.
Russ, NCNE
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
Ken
The 68 and 71 look really nice too.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
<< <i>That 64 would be my favorite of the group (based on those pictues at least). Looks really PQ for a MS62. >>
Hooked,
You have a good eye, (which, of course, means I agree with you ). I think both it and the 1871 are upgrade candidates. After the set is completed some time off in the distant future, I'll give PCGS another shot at them.
Russ, NCNE
Mojo
-Jim Morrison-
Mr. Mojorizn
my blog:www.numistories.com
of it, and it has been really hard to find good examples. I'm sure that
you get lots of competition for the 62-64 range with others looking for
more affordable examples.
Capped Bust Half Series
Capped Bust Half Dime Series
I've been looking for some other major varieties to add (like the 1867 double date), but those can be really hard to find in a nice VF-ish grade.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Very nice, thanks for sharing. My favorite is the '69, especially cool given the grading history to get it where it is. Two-centers are among my favorite copper coins, a really neat series I'd like to collect someday.
Joe
I shipped away my beloved PR64 RD yesterday.
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
I wish when I sold the coins that I had to sell last spring I had saved the 1867 2 center that I had purchased out of a complete 2 cent collection raw and came back from pcgs as 65 r & b with 90 % over all red and full thick satin type luster on both sides. Not for me as much as I liked it but I would have sold it to Russ at cost. His enthusiasm for the hobby is refreshing and is what real coin collecting is all about.
Les
<< <i>When I made fun of two cent pieces recently as looking like 2 reverses stuck together I wasn't kidding >>
Gee, Les, it's been at least a week since I made fun of Web TV.
Russ, NCNE
CoinPeople.com || CoinWiki.com || NumisLinks.com
The 62 grades kinda baffle me though. Why are they graded so low? The 1865 is obviously weakly struck but does it hurt the grade that much? The 1864 is kinda weak struck & I see some ticks top & bottom on the obv but it doesn't look that bad. The 1871 MS63 R&B looks the best to me.
<< <i>The 1865 is obviously weakly struck but does it hurt the grade that much? >>
Yep, that's why it graded 62. It's VERY weakly struck. If it were a later year, it may not have been penalized as much, but the 1865's generally come well-struck. As for the 1864, I think it's just flat undergraded by a point, as I also think the 1871 is.
Russ, NCNE