Fresh from ANACS: a couple of cool errors.
fivecents
Posts: 11,207 ✭✭✭✭✭
The 1997 is a MS63RD: DBL STRK, Broadstruck.
The No Date is an AU50: Large Clip. I call this one a Key Hole coin.
The No Date is an AU50: Large Clip. I call this one a Key Hole coin.
0
Comments
(Using a Sony Mavica for the images??)
42/92
If it has a memorial reverse, I'd bet my mortgage payment that it is a 1964-D. The Denver Mint that year had either a copper shortage or a farsighted press foreman. Of all the dated large clips (40% or more) I've seen, at least half, and maybe closer to 75%, have been 1964-Ds, and most of the undated ones I've seen have the correct lettering and portrait for that year as well. Here's but one example from my own collection.
Very nice coins, thank you for sharing them.
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
btw.... Do you think the 1997 is double struck? I don't see it. It looks like the "doubling" comes from the coin metal being streched while it was struck out of collar, not from a double strike.
<< <i>
btw.... Do you think the 1997 is double struck? I don't see it. It looks like the "doubling" comes from the coin metal being streched while it was struck out of collar, not from a double strike. >>
Yes I do. I can see a faint ghost of Lincoln from the first strike expanding out toward the rim, and the rim is fully formed around K-9 to K-12. As I learned here recently, that bit of rim must be from an earlier strike, since the second strike occurred out of the collar.
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
I attached a 2000 New Hampshire quarter struck thru grease.