1967 Canadian quarter...Worthless? Ha!
XpipedreamR
Posts: 8,059 ✭✭
I see in my coin book that for this year there are both .800 and .500 silver quarters with the same weight. I think the same is true for the dime, too. Maybe there are others that I'm not aware of.
How can one differentiate the two types?
How can one differentiate the two types?
0
Comments
Ebay
myEbay
DPOTD 3
<< <i>Drop test (on a glass surface) saved me once , from buying a 1833 counterfeit drachma in unc ! >>
Are there really 1833 Drachmai in UNC?
First DAMMIT BOY! 25/9/05 (Finally!)
" XpipedreamR is cool because you can get a bottle of 500 for like a dollar. " - Aspirin
<< <i>they are both pretty much worthless, so why would you care? >>
Somebody trying to put together a complete set of circulating Canadian coins might care. The two have slightly different KM#'s ( 68 and 68a I think).
<< <i>they are both pretty much worthless, so why would you care? >>
The coin's worth is irrelevant.
The fineness is an inherent property of the coin, and many like to properly identify and classify coin varieties based on these sort of characteristics.
The coin's worth is an arbitrary measure based on how many people are interested in a coin at a given point in time, and what they're willing to pay for it. It has nothing to with the coin itself. It's the difference between numismatics and the coin business.
This Canadian quarter...actually all of these Canadian Centennial coins...are really cool looking coins. Quite frankly, I'm delighted that they are worthless! It just makes it that much cheaper to obtain primo pieces
Clankeye