It's a real beauty. Congratulations. I already know the grade, but I'd like to comment on the coin. It has EXCEPTIONAL mirrors for a 1965, and the reverse is extremely frosty for this issue. Killer coin, and one of my personal favorites.
Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
Now that the grade is revealed, for fun, go look at the few that did make the designation. Most have pretty weak reverses, particularly the inner wings near the body. There is also ALWAYS a ring of die polish inside the obverse rim at 4:00 and 8:00. The area by the head on the reverse is usually not well mirrored. Most also have a streak on the obverse from 1:00 to 7:00 visible on the bust. My keeper 65 is not designated either. It is an NGC MS67 *. I have submitted a few that got the designation, but this one won't ever be sold.
Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
Maybe it's just a lousy picture, but the cameo looks weak around George's hairline. It looks to me like one of those borderline 66CAM/67 coins, where PCGS bumped the numeric grade a point as consolation for not quite making the designation. Who knows, it could come back 66CAM next time through. Good luck with your resubmission.
Sean Reynolds
Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
Thanks for the very nice coin, Vam ... sorry it didn't go higher. I put in a much higher bid, but had no competition. I hope the '65 JFK more than makes up for it. Happy holidays to you -- and all!
Comments
Russ, NCNE
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
42/92
I would give it MS67CAM
PCGS MS67. The pops show that they are very tough on 65's when it comes to the designation.
The Ludlow Brilliant Collection (1938-64)
42/92
<< <i>Can you spell C-R-A-C-K-O-U-T? For $21, I'll take my chances... >>
I agree! Crack that sucker
<< <i>What does SMS mean? >>
Special Mint Set. No proof or mint sets were produced from 1965 to 1967. The SMS is a hybrid - not a proof, but not a business strike.
Russ, NCNE
Now that the grade is revealed, for fun, go look at the few that did make the designation. Most have pretty weak reverses, particularly the inner wings near the body. There is also ALWAYS a ring of die polish inside the obverse rim at 4:00 and 8:00. The area by the head on the reverse is usually not well mirrored. Most also have a streak on the obverse from 1:00 to 7:00 visible on the bust. My keeper 65 is not designated either. It is an NGC MS67 *. I have submitted a few that got the designation, but this one won't ever be sold.
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
The Ludlow Brilliant Collection (1938-64)
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
The Ludlow Brilliant Collection (1938-64)
The Ludlow Brilliant Collection (1938-64)