Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Which Photograph do you like better?

airplanenutairplanenut Posts: 22,726 ✭✭✭✭✭
Howdy,

I have took two shots to capture the luster of this toned reverse... which do you like more and why?

#1image

#2image

Thanks,

Jeremy
JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research

Comments

  • Options
    I think that #1 is a more attractive photo, but #2 is more revealing.
  • Options
    mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    #1 Lighting is better and contrast is nicer. #2 lighting is too harsh for me, lose detail.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • Options
    PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
    #1 the detail in the wings shows up better.
  • Options
    greghansengreghansen Posts: 4,301 ✭✭✭
    I like the 'blend' of photo #1 better. The left half and right half of the coin seem to blend together more naturally. #2 seems a little harsher and more forced.

    Greg Hansen, Melbourne, FL Click here for any current EBAY auctions Multiple "Circle of Trust" transactions over 14 years on forum

  • Options
    BarryBarry Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
    I like the way #1 looks, but the more important question is which pic is a better representation of what the coin really looks like?
  • Options
    BoomBoom Posts: 10,165
    imageIf I'm not mistaken ,I believe you said the objective was to show off the luster-While they're the same coin and both beautiful picture, #2 exhibits the frostiness of luster better,but that's just my opinion They're both beautifully taken photos! If the objective was to show the beauty of a toned coin, I'd pick #1 but since you want to show off the beauty of sugary/frosty Mint luster-I have to go with #2
  • Options
    I like #1.

    Very impressive, Jeremy.



    Clankeye
    Brevity is the soul of wit. --William Shakespeare
  • Options
    BladeBlade Posts: 1,744
    #1 enhances the toning the best (brightest magenta colors), whereas #2 shows the overall luster better. #1 seems to hit the luster right on the color spot. I like it better.
    Tom

    NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

    Type collector since 1981
    Current focus 1855 date type set
  • Options
    #2 - one seems harsh on the eye.
  • Options
    Nice pics! I like photo 1.......photo 2 looks a bit washed out to me.
  • Options
    airplanenutairplanenut Posts: 22,726 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>
    I like the way #1 looks, but the more important question is which pic is a better representation of what the coin really looks like?
    >>

    Actually, both are quite accurate... it's simply how the coin is held in the light... the problem is finding a happy medium with the angle of the light, and getting a head-on picture. Without a video camera, it's quite difficult to capture both toning and luster.

    Jeremy
    JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research
  • Options
    CoinGuy42CoinGuy42 Posts: 307 ✭✭✭
    I think #1 shows more detail. PS - Happy Thanksgiving all.
  • Options
    ms70ms70 Posts: 13,958 ✭✭✭✭✭

    #1 shows more detail, most noticably around the eagles head. Nice pics.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file