Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Washington's are hard to take good pics of.

mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
I got this in the mail yesterday and was trying to take a picture. They are hard to get good pictures of. it took me quite a while to get this one, but I think it turned out well. It's hard to get a nice contrast on the face. The light needs to come from a high angle. If the light comes in from the side it gets black and white. Maybe if I had more lights.

image

coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section

Comments

  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    That is an excellent image. Crisp, clear and accurate color.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    That took about 75 pics to get that one.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • Options
    bennybravobennybravo Posts: 1,950 ✭✭✭
    I took this one this morning in natural light.Thats a nice picture.What light source did you use?

    image
  • Options
    BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    taken with a desk tensor at 10:00 and a half shaded window at 2:00:

    image

    image

    image

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • Options
    Cam40Cam40 Posts: 8,146 ✭
    Thats very telling of the coin if you can not only show a great picture with great details,
    but also describe what lighting(s) were used.

    Those are some awsome pics you three. image
  • Options
    mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    I think a diffuse light may be useful for white coins to avoid the harsh contrast and shadows. I'll take some tomorrow with day light and see what I get. I think the lights were at about 9 and 1 at the highest angle I could get while keeping room for the camera. I will have a copy stand soon. Hopefully that will help give more consistent results. For now they are all handheld.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • Options
    DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    It is very difficult to capture both the fields and the portrait, and to correctly capture luster. Indoor lighting is problematic. Reflected natural light works wonders, but weather and time of day are not always cooperative. I've been playing with a two lamp setup, but the pic below shows the need for a third.

    image
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • Options
    Cam40Cam40 Posts: 8,146 ✭
    ...then DonH posts.....

    POW Right in the Washies!!!!!!!
  • Options
    BikingnutBikingnut Posts: 3,563 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like you got it right. MS67 on the grade?
    US Navy CWO3 retired. 12/81-09/04

    Looking for PCGS AU58 Washington's, 32-63.
  • Options
    DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    Thanks. The 60 is raw. I was pretty lucky with that one and the 56 below. One of the local dealer had them in his carousel in 2x2's for $2 each.

    image
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • Options
    bennybravobennybravo Posts: 1,950 ✭✭✭
    Nice pics everyone!After seeing these,I was inspired to try for some sharper detail.image
    image
  • Options
    DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    Very cool pics all! I love the different looks through-out the series. The pic below was taken outdoors.

    image
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • Options
    XpipedreamRXpipedreamR Posts: 8,059 ✭✭
    Show-offs! You guys all suck. I guess I'm just jealousimage


    DHeath-that 65 and its picture are awesome! I'm just starting to get into SMS.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file