What is your best homerun on a coin submisson?

What is the best homerun you have ever made on a coin submisson to the big two: NGC or PCGS?
I submitted a 2000 Library of Congress 10$ platinum and gold that made a PCGS MS70. I also cracked a 1896( I think that is the correct date) 20$ gold liberty out of a PCGS MS63 rattler and it made it into a NGC ms64 holder.
I submitted a 2000 Library of Congress 10$ platinum and gold that made a PCGS MS70. I also cracked a 1896( I think that is the correct date) 20$ gold liberty out of a PCGS MS63 rattler and it made it into a NGC ms64 holder.
0
Comments
David
I left em raw
Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
PR70DCAM's from the mint
My posts viewed
since 8/1/6
Of course, it would have been just as easy to write my consignor a check for under $10k in the firstplace, keep the coin myself and make all the money, so I count this one as a "homerun" for me on a coin submission
Wondercoin
Cross-over NGC 1926-D MS62 SLQ to PCGS AU58FH.
MS65 (I was expecting a 63)
PCGS PR69DCAM
Found in a $15 proof set.
Lori
You 1881-CC dollar is just one more example of how the services often overgrade Carson City dollars. The coin should have gone into an MS-64 holder. There are too many marks on the cheek to be graded MS-65.
I have never really had a "home run"
I have done very well in my grading results from PCGS.
My crossover rate is really high.
I either get the same grade or 1 higher 95% of the time.
Once I went up 2 grades on an undergraded Morgan Dollar.
But since it was only a few hundred bucks difference I still would not consider that a "homerun."
Les
You 1881-CC dollar is just one more example of how the services often overgrade Carson City dollars. The coin should have gone into an MS-64 holder. There are too many marks on the cheek to be graded MS-65. -- by BillJones
Now that's a big difference in opinion...
1 21257842 1964 50C Accented Hair USA PR68DC
1 21257843 1964 50C Accented Hair USA PR65DC
Date Received: 03/05/2003
Date Shipped: 04/08/2003
Proof sets, $27.50 each.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>Hi Techeff!
You 1881-CC dollar is just one more example of how the services often overgrade Carson City dollars. The coin should have gone into an MS-64 holder. There are too many marks on the cheek to be graded MS-65. >>
I agree. The coin is really no better than 64. It will be interesting to see what happens when it comes time to sell. It has been my experience that obviously overgraded coins, such as this one, don't do well when it comes time to sell...even if they are in a PCGS holder.
Came back from NGC as MS67FB. Not too shabby for a buck twenty plus grading.....
John Marnard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1920, page 235ff
<< <i>I received a scarce half dollar back from PCGS which was graded MS65, and worth about $10,000. Along with the slab came the paperwork of the graders, who all listed the coin as grading MS66. I surmised that 1) the paperwork was sent by mistake, and 2) the finalizer changed the grade to MS65. >>
A finalizer has that kind of power? He can just willy-nilly override the consensus of multiple graders? That's more than a little disconcerting. That being the case, what the hell is the point of consensus grading?
At least, in this case, it worked out and you got the grade you deserved.
Russ, NCNE
09/07/2006
<< <i>Hi Techeff!
You 1881-CC dollar is just one more example of how the services often overgrade Carson City dollars. The coin should have gone into an MS-64 holder. There are too many marks on the cheek to be graded MS-65. >>
I agree that this 81-CC is not a 65 and I doubt that this is in a PCGS holder!
<< <i>Hi Techeff! Let us know who's holder its in????
Thanks, MapMaker.
dragon
1 PR69DCAM Kept it
1 MS69 Kept it
1 MS70 About the 10th one! $625.00
Those were the good ol days!!!!
Still have 6 PR70DCAMS, 28 MS70s. I had a total of 11 PR70DCAMs made,and 52 MS70s.
Just Modern Junk, but what the heck,,,,,,,,
Thomas Aldrich
yes the finalizer can down or upgrade whatever the other graders state. both PCGS and NGC run this way.
Greg
Registry 1909-1958 Proof Lincolns
<< <i>A finalizer has that kind of power? He can just willy-nilly override the consensus of multiple graders? That's more than a little disconcerting. That being the case, what the hell is the point of consensus grading? >>
Contrary to popular belief moderns are graded by one grader not a consensus
<< <i>Contrary to popular belief moderns are graded by one grader not a consensus >>
He wasn't discussing a modern coin.
<< <i>yes the finalizer can down or upgrade whatever the other graders state. both PCGS and NGC run this way. >>
If I were working on the grading team and all of us arrived at the same grade only to have the finalizer summarily dismiss it and change it to what he thought it was, that would be my last day on the job. It's a ridiculous system that should not be marketed as "consensus".
Russ, NCNE
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>The finalizer... I wonder if that is the title for the job? >>
Actually, I believe it is !! If so, one of the coolest job titles out there....
I'm looking forward to "Master and Commander"
Sorry, I can't say what coin, my dealer might be reading this
Thanks, MapMaker.
MapMaker, It's in a PCGS hoder... Cert# 21366344
Here is what another board member (Gilbert) said the first time I posted the pics... Which I was pretty happy about until you guys brought me down...
...Those marks a really superficial and the coin looks to still have its original "skin". Did you cherrypick this coin or did you just get lucky?
Anyway, protect that baby with your life. Not many like that around, and if you should ever get an inkling to do something that would disturb this original, just find one of us oldheads to relinquish it to.
Here's a little somewhat insignificant tip on evaluating the reverse of a Morgan: look at the detail of the eagle's right toe(s). When the detail is there, you MAY be onto to something.
Were it not for the minor superficial scrapes on the obverse, I wouldn't be surprised if this coin got a 67 - it sure looks to have the strike and luster. -- Gilbert
your 81-CC is a very attractive coin. I think I said 64 when I saw it but keep in mind that we are looking at either a large scan or a photo and not the coin which makes a difference in this state of preservation. I like your coin... MS65 is not unreasonable at all.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i><< Hi Techeff! Let us know who's holder its in????
Thanks, MapMaker.
MapMaker, It's in a PCGS hoder... Cert# 21366344
Here is what another board member (Gilbert) said the first time I posted the pics... Which I was pretty happy about until you guys brought me down...
...Those marks a really superficial and the coin looks to still have its original "skin". Did you cherrypick this coin or did you just get lucky?
Anyway, protect that baby with your life. Not many like that around, and if you should ever get an inkling to do something that would disturb this original, just find one of us oldheads to relinquish it to.
Here's a little somewhat insignificant tip on evaluating the reverse of a Morgan: look at the detail of the eagle's right toe(s). When the detail is there, you MAY be onto to something.
Were it not for the minor superficial scrapes on the obverse, I wouldn't be surprised if this coin got a 67 - it sure looks to have the strike and luster. -- Gilbert >>
I think you are very fortunate to have this 81-CC in a PCGS holder @ MS-65 A true 65 should not have this many marks on it.
A.N.A. GRADING GUIDE: Quote, MS-65 Contact Marks: Light and scattered WITHOUT major distracting marks in prime focal areas.
So I guess its up to what you consider major distracting marks.
Regards, MapMaker
Coin Junkie
cameoproofcoins.com
keoj
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
We don't have a finalizer. We have verifiers and they cannot arbitraily change the grade of a coin. If a verifier disagrees with the grade, he can show it to another grader. If they both agree that the grade should be changed then it is. in other words, to get out of PCGS, at least two graders must agree on the grade of a coin.
David Hall