MS-65 would be "grade-flation" which seems to be going around these days....
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Thanks everyone! I am going to the dog track in a few minutes so I better reveal the grade now. PCGS MS65 I got it in the Superior sale lot# 2980. mike
I just got done completing an invoice online for the grading of five $5 gold pieces over at NGC, and I'll be mailing it out on Monday. I don't sell them raw though. I just buy em raw
A 65? I would have said 63 and on a good day 64, but then again, we are looking at a scan and not the coin and I still maintain there is a big difference.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
For comparison purposes, here’s a PCGS MS-64 that I popped into my type set last spring. Compare this coin with the one that started this string. This is an example of “grade-flation” IMO. It often in happens in hot markets like this, and it’s a reflection of a lowering of grading standards in general.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Bill your coin is nice also and I would be happy to add it to my collection! As Grip said the luster is a big thing. I have eight MS64's and in person this 65 is clearly a cut above the those. I guess another way to describe it would be to say when I laid them all next to each other on the table this 65 was the coin that stood out- even from a distance. But as others have said it's only a picture and our picture quality is lacking. mike
I agree the luster can pull a coin up a grade, maybe, but 65 seems excessive for a coin with hits like that in the cheek. It must be one of those coins you have to see in person. Mike, if you say it's a blazer I'm right there with you, cuz you have some pretty awesome coins and obviously a great eye too! I know coins with great luster tend to photograph with the flaws greatly magnified, too.
Yes I'll get some images up as soon as the coins come back, maybe a guess the grade or something!
Comments
By the way, it's a very pretty and extremely lustrous $5 Liberty.
Stuart
Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal
"Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
jom
Nice - 64
My posts viewed
since 8/1/6
siliconvalleycoins.com
MS-65 would be "grade-flation" which seems to be going around these days....
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Bill your coin is nice also and I would be happy to add it to my collection! As Grip said the luster is a big thing. I have eight MS64's and in person this 65 is clearly a cut above the those. I guess another way to describe it would be to say when I laid them all next to each other on the table this 65 was the coin that stood out- even from a distance. But as others have said it's only a picture and our picture quality is lacking
The "D" makes the coin.
R
Yes I'll get some images up as soon as the coins come back, maybe a guess the grade or something!