A fragile beauty

(I apologize to dial-ups for images this size.) I've been playing around with mixed lighting and am slowly getting accurate shots of some toned copper. This is one of my favorites because it has a lot going on:
1. Beautiful and questionable toning
2. It's a rare 1859/1859 RPD
3. The reverse is more prooflike than many proofs
4. Looks incredibly undergraded in an ANACS MS63 holder (no net grade)
5. I'd have second thoughts about ever removing it due to a fragile looking planchet crack along the upper rim, causing it to lose a couple denticles already.
Reverse image
1. Beautiful and questionable toning
2. It's a rare 1859/1859 RPD
3. The reverse is more prooflike than many proofs
4. Looks incredibly undergraded in an ANACS MS63 holder (no net grade)
5. I'd have second thoughts about ever removing it due to a fragile looking planchet crack along the upper rim, causing it to lose a couple denticles already.
Reverse image

Paul <> altered surfaces <> CoinGallery.org
0
Comments
John
siliconvalleycoins.com
Paul.
I am curious. Approximately how long does it take you to photograph one coin on average?
The blue eye shadow on that lady makes her look especially attractive.
In this variety you can easily see the repunching of the whole date. Many of the 1900s IHCs show this characteristic [1900/1900, 1901/1901, 1903/1903 etc.] Is it unusual for just the 1859 to have the date completely repunched or is this uncommon among all the CNs?
Possibly kept down for the planchet crack/lamination?
That's a heck of a coin!
LSCC#1864
Ebay Stuff
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
Clankeye
Lakesammman - I'm using the Ott lights as ambient light and a 60 watt reveal bulb as adjustable close-up lighting. I'm also angling both the camera lens and the coin to capture the lighting better than a 90 degree table shot. Still, 90% of the shots look like crap. I'd like to get a better feel for it so I can image proofs more predictably away from home.
BigD5 and Steve27 - Even with deductions for the planchet crack it still looks a couple grades too low. I showed this coin to Mark Feld at FUN and he thought the color was questionable, a bit too bright. Maybe ANACS wasn't certain enough to write "recolored" on the label but decided to net grade it anyway.
Simply put, the color does not look right to me. It is a bit too pink/orange and is not the correct hue for a mint state 1859 cent. My best guess is that the coin has been dipped and that it retoned to the color you see now. Perhaps ANACS suspected that and downgraded it as a result. I would be very surprised if either NGC or PCGS would holder it. I think the coin is quite pretty, but, that is a different matter.