So, why were there no proof coins struck during the 1920's?

Well, there might have been some proof Peace Dollars from the 20's if I recall correctly, but why were there no proof sets with 1C, 5C, 10C, etc.? People probably could have afforded proof sets during the Roaring 20's. A proof Standing Liberty Quarter would be a beautiful thing!
Dan
Dan
0
Comments
FrederickCoinClub
Frank
Gee that would be nice.
I love that coin and to see the condition of most of them makes me sick.
Glen
Lincoln
Buffalo
Merc
SLQ
Walker
Morgan
Peace
and of course a Saint!
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
Of course most (except the Hawaiian) of these coins were struck by mint officials for their personal pleasure.
My guess as to why there were no regular proofs has to do with public demand.
At this time there was a shift towards matte proof coins, and the public just didn't like them. I believe that all proofs, with the exception of the 1921 satin proof, struck in the 20's were mattes.
njcoincrank
There also were 5 1927 Buffalo nickels stuck by Sinock using chromium plated dies and they were graded specimen by NGC. There is no mistaking those coins for business strikes, they are matte and struck like no business strike I have ever seen. I know a dealer who owned two of them at one time.
There were some Chapman and Zerbe proof Morgans made, and some matte proof 1921 and 1922 Peace dollars.
many theories and conjectures hVE BEEN ADVANCED BUT CLEARLY there were secret proofs made or i like to call them special preparation and strikings of coins for collectors??? /very important persons!
for me i think that along with the war that stopped proof production early on in these years the people in power or with the power to desire and authorize proof coin strikings just did not do it/authorise it/ were interested themselves in producing proof coins so they went unmade for the most part
except for some secret mintings as per the above for important personages
sincerely michael
After the War, Warren G. Harding was elected president, and he appointed Andrew Mellon to be secretary of the treasury. Mellon viewed the production of Proof coins as well as commemorative coins as a waste of governmental resources. He believed that the national mint should have only spent its time producing coins for circulation. He got his way with the Proof coinage for the most part, but Congress continued to authorize commemorative coins until Herbert Hoover became president in 1929.
Hoover agreed with Mellon that the production of Proof coins and commemorative pieces were a waste of public resources. As a result the production of all commemorative coins as well as Proof coins ceased during his administration. In general one could say that Andrew Mellon had the most negative attitudes of any treasury secretary toward coin collectors, and Herbert Hoover was the most anti-coin collector president who ever held the office.
Franklin Roosevelt was elected president in 1932. Roosevelt was a stamp collector and his first treasury secretary, William Wooden, was a coin collector and numismatic author. He was the “Wooden” end of the first major study on U.S. pattern coins “Adams and Wooden.” Roosevelt viewed commemorative coins and Proofs as one way to combat the depression blues, and in 1936 Proof coin production was resumed on a regular basis. It would be suspended again with the beginning of World War II
The 1927 Buffalo nickels you mentioned were minted using the reverse die used on the 1936 Satin finish Buffalo nickel. Which came first, I don't know. Also the 1927's are very satin in appearance. Some of the 1936 satins are semi brilliant, amost type 2 in appearance. This would lead me to believe that the brilliant-satin finish 1936 were struck first.
njcoincrank
It's interesting that Hoover was anti-coin collecting, but considering that only a few thousand proofs would be made each year, I can see why it might be considered a waste. With millions made per year, I guess it's more profitable.
Dan
mcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu">dmcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu