PUBLIC OPINION NEEDED, WAS I WRONG?/edited to show sellers response

To retract this bid after seeing sellers feedback?
heres his reply letter:
To member: pontiacinf@aol.com
From member: smoking_coins
--------------------
Do not lye on your bid retraction, YOU DO NOT EVEN TRY TO CONTACT ME.
Thanks
for not bidding.
heres my reply:
eBay does not tolerate spam (i.e., unsolicited commercial email) and is
taking steps to protect members from this abuse. In addition, solicitations
to buy or sell items outside of eBay violate eBay rules and are not covered
by services that protect members such as feedback, insurance, escrow, and
dispute resolution. If this is an offer to buy/sell items outside of eBay,
please do not participate. Enter the following link into your browser to learn more. Link: http://pages.ebay.com/help/new/stopping_spam.html
Obviously you didnt take the time to read the above...your business practices has been exposed and you for the "honesty" policy you employ.
This has been sent to eBay.
"YOU" have a nice day, and please enjoy reading what the PCGS Board Members are posting about on "your" honest auctions.
heres his reply letter:
To member: pontiacinf@aol.com
From member: smoking_coins
--------------------
Do not lye on your bid retraction, YOU DO NOT EVEN TRY TO CONTACT ME.
Thanks
for not bidding.
heres my reply:
eBay does not tolerate spam (i.e., unsolicited commercial email) and is
taking steps to protect members from this abuse. In addition, solicitations
to buy or sell items outside of eBay violate eBay rules and are not covered
by services that protect members such as feedback, insurance, escrow, and
dispute resolution. If this is an offer to buy/sell items outside of eBay,
please do not participate. Enter the following link into your browser to learn more. Link: http://pages.ebay.com/help/new/stopping_spam.html
Obviously you didnt take the time to read the above...your business practices has been exposed and you for the "honesty" policy you employ.
This has been sent to eBay.
"YOU" have a nice day, and please enjoy reading what the PCGS Board Members are posting about on "your" honest auctions.

Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
0
Comments
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
Read first--bid later.
Clankeye
guess i should have read farther...glad I didnt buy it and find out later.
Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
Also you stated in your bid retraction that you could not contact the seller……if I am reading this thread right thats not why you wanted to retracted your bid.
Its ok to back out of a bid even if your having doubts……but don’t lie in the explanation for it for all to see is rather unfair.
Mike
Lincoln Wheats (1909 - 1958) Basic Set - Always Interested in Upgrading!
Now the one thing the negative feedback does show is that he is not always a "strait shooter". Based on that, I think you can be sure that he has searched the coins, there will be no key dates (or anything else worth more than a couple of bucks).
Once again, remember that there is not Santa Claus in coin numismatics. If you spend $40 on a set of coins, the set of coins will be worth $40 (or less).
I was clearly worng here in as I didnt read the feedback first.
But ill be dog gone if im gonna eat 80 bucks because of it.
Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
sooooo truuuue
Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
I see nothing wrong with retracting an honest mistake.Al
Alex
I sit here at the keyboard chuckling to myself that Members here seem offended by the use of that name in feedback. I bet I have heard hundreds of sellers and numerous fellow Members called that name on these boards. Let's get real.....
Anyway, this seller has 769 Postive feedbacks, 2 neutrals and 13 negative feedbacks from just 6 unique users. Five of the negatives are from just 1 buyer. I agree with TBT, the buyer owed the seller the opportunity to make the deal "square". Just firing off a negative feedback without any attempt to negotiate a reasonable compromise, seems completely unwarranted. Just my opinion.....
Coinlearner, Ahrensdad, Nolawyer, RG, coinlieutenant, Yorkshireman, lordmarcovan, Soldi, masscrew, JimTyler, Relaxn, jclovescoins
Now listen boy, I'm tryin' to teach you sumthin' . . . . that ain't no optical illusion, it only looks like an optical illusion.
My mind reader refuses to charge me....
and thought i saw a pair of old honest people. Maybe the feedback thats bad is from a few unique not
so honest people, or maybe it was...anyhow, I made a mistake, and like i said I dont feel I should pay 80 dollars
to squelch it.
Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
joejimbob (65) Apr-10-03 15:32:55 PDT 3016058675 S Praise : I got the crap tin, hardly any silver, no penny older than 41, not like pictures.
Response by smoking_coins - Sorry no 1909 S VDB, Do not forget you got a tin worth more then you paid.
jusdoy8354 (308) Apr-09-03 12:47:12 PDT 3012197498 S Praise : fast delivery----fair coins----------wouldn't buy again------be careful !!!!
Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
You really did the right thing. He seems allot like the person who sent me the nasty PM last night. Only your guy did not use all caps.
Richard.
You have the right to retract your bid, but of the choices eBay allows for the reason to retract, you picked one that insinuates bad things about the seller……..It was a lie and done with malice as the theme of your post dictates. Why? To warn the PCGS board of what? Speculation? Again you are in the right to retract but not slander and assume.
Shame on you for posting in a public forum about someone you have NEVER done business with. This lynch mob mentality is medieval and wrong. His response proves nothing but that he is upset about your unprovoked attack.
I have had it with the constant attacks on dealers and eBay sellers in the US coin forum. Take it to the open board where this belongs.
Rusty
Sometimes & only sometimes this lynch mob mentality takes over these boards. While some are justifiable and good info on blatent abuses, these posts can have a great financial impact on dealers and collector's (selling off duplicates) business.
In some instances this is downright slander! I'd like a dealer/collector who is unjustly harmed and can prove it take the poster to court and seek damages.
Posters have to be 100% certain that what they say will stand up in a court. Those posts are very helpful to all of us if the info is 100% verifable and not wriitten out of anger. But to single out people that make a mistake or two don't deserve to have their business suffer because one collector or two collector's may have percieved he was taken advantage of.
I've been very lucky as a collector and part-time seller not to have run into this situation yet. But one person commands too much power on these boards to make it a level playing field. Maybe it will take one or two collector's to be charged with slander and loose their collections to pay damages. While I'd hate this to happen, I think that this lesson would really hit home!!
If your case/experience is rock solid, then please post. But before someone posts, a review the financial/emotional impact on the seller HAS to be taken into consideration. Facts have to be solid enough to stand up and be able to completely defend their their actions with concrete facts and showing a pattern of abuse. If they can't, then DON'T POST IT!!!
And lastly, put yourself in that person's position and see how you'd react. His comments are obiously out of anger, Don't we all say/do things steming from emotion rather than good sense when hit between the eyes without warning? Enough said.
It used to be that eBay would allow one to specify the reason bids were being retracted. However, honest bidders used the option in scam auctions to send a message to potential victims about the scam nature of the auction. eBay felt it necessary to cut off this avenue of communication and has now limted the reasons to a choice of these three:
--Entered wrong bid amount.
--Seller changed the description of the item.
--Cannot contact the seller.
In most situations, like this one, none of the reason are true. Yet, the system eBay has set up requires legitimately retracting bidders to give a false reason for retracting in most situations. I suppose pontiacinf could have picked the first one which does not cast any aspersions on the seller. However, for this one to be true, I'd then expect to see a replacement bid of the correct amount. In fact the rules about retracting seem to require this action stating in bold red letters "If this occurs, re-enter the correct bid amount immediately."
In any event, if you agree pontiacinf was within his right to retract, he should probably be given a break on the reason given (given the way eBay has set up the system).
JMHO,
WH