2 cent experts: 1864 Repunched Date????

I have an 1864 LG Motto in a SEGS xf40 holder. The date was obviously repunched with a huge seperation, especially on the 1. Does anyone know anything about this variety and whether it is worth anything? I was considering selling it.
I can post pics if anyone is really interested.
I can post pics if anyone is really interested.
Doug
0
Comments
I might add that if this were a modern coin you have people beating a path to your door. Modern collectors get a lot more turned on by things like than classic coin collectors.
How coincidental - I just bought a raw one here in Brazil exactly as you described. I'd say an XF coin all the way with the distinct repunched date, mainly on the 1 and 8.
I started researching myself and found basically what Mr. Jones is saying. Here is a web site also: 1864 Two Cent Piece - Attribution Guide by Frank Leone. It only covers business strikes and you better be prepared for a long afternoon of reading to try to match your coin up - he says there were over 100 die marriages for the 1864 alone!
Perhaps Mr Jones could answer this - do you know if ANACS would attribute the repunched date on the 1864 2C? I see PCGS doesn't recognize it and not sure about NGC either.
Thanks and congrats on your find. Dave
I think that NGC would do an attribution for a fee, but by the time you paid the fee plus the grading charge, the entire expense might be equal the value of the coin. I've paid a total of $33 recently for the slab and service.
As Bill mentioned 1864 wasn't a good year for copper quality control at the Mint. The rush to put copper onto the market, combined with 3 different Indian cent issues, made for a slew of varieties. Clashed dies are the norm for 1864 (no L) bronze IH's. There's even a triple punched date in the 2-cent series (courtesy of Baker's Numismatics):
A very unique variety has recently been listed from this year in the Indian cent series. A few 1864 bronze examples have been found with concentric lathe lines that circle the center point of the obverse. Rick Snow presumes this was the result of a quick fix on an unsatisfactory die due to time constraints. Attributed as S-11, the finest known just popped up in the Colburn sale in Heritage's Central States, though not listed as such:
The repunched date adds little or no value..........................much like most of your posts.
Ed
K S