Home U.S. Coin Forum

Will you start collecting Roosevelts because of the FT designation?

dbldie55dbldie55 Posts: 7,736 ✭✭✭✭✭
I have been reading all of the hoop-la the last few days about this. I agree with those that do not care for these designations as they create too much focus on one area of the coin. It seems, that with the exception of Full Head, all of these designations are on the reverse. People seem to pay much, much more based on one small area of a coin than for another coin that may be superior everywhere (except the one small area).

But to the point.

Obviously, many of those that collect these will be pleased with this news. But, how many will start a collection because of it? I keep reading how this is so great for the series and was curious why someone would only start a collection because a grading service came up with a designation for it.

So, who are the "new" roosevelt collectors?
Collector and Researcher of Liberty Head Nickels. ANA LM-6053

Comments

  • wingedlibertywingedliberty Posts: 4,805 ✭✭✭
    I have been collecting full torch Roosevelts for 9 years. It has nothing to do with PCGS placing the designation now, although I am happy that they did.


    Brian.
  • mbbikermbbiker Posts: 2,873
    I've just gotten interested in roosies but now that they are putting Ft on the holders i think i'm going to be buying up a bunch of roosies at a local show in a few weeks before they all find out that PCGS is putting that on the holders
  • itsnotjustmeitsnotjustme Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭
    No
    Give Blood (Red Bags) & Platelets (Yellow Bags)!
  • No.

    Cameron Kiefer
  • LucyBopLucyBop Posts: 14,001 ✭✭✭
    more Full Torchie for me!
    imageBe Bop A Lula!!
    "Senorita HepKitty"
    "I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Not me. I like coins I can actually see without magnification.image

    Russ, NCNE
  • vam44vam44 Posts: 291
    NO,I`m hoarding FB type 1 standing Lib quarters.(FB=Full Boob)image
    A dealer once asked me if I noticed any three-legged buffalos on the bourse,to which I replied,"...no,but I saw alot of two-legged jackasses..."
  • EVillageProwlerEVillageProwler Posts: 5,856 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I already have a full set of silver Roosies in a Dansco album. I could care less about a full torch on a coin whose details I can barely discern...

    EVP

    How does one get a hater to stop hating?

    I can be reached at evillageprowler@gmail.com

  • relayerrelayer Posts: 10,570

    No, but I may have to buy one if it becomes a type set variety
    image
    My posts viewed image times
    since 8/1/6
  • Nope, but I will admit I checked my set for FT. image

    Andy image
    We are finite beings, limited in all our powers, and, hence, our conclusions are not only relative, but they should ever be held subject to correction. Positive assurance is unattainable. The dogmatist is the only one who claims to possess absolute certainty.

    First POTD 9/19/05!!

  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,701 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I've long checked these coins in circulation and looked at the coins in mint
    sets but have never spent a lot of time on them or collected them in an or-
    ganized fashion.

    Very few people will rush out and start a set of dimes just because PCGS will
    start the new designation. But, this will focus many people's attention on this
    long neglected series. Some of these people will become fascinated by the im-
    portance, history, and scarcity of these coins and start a collection. Designation
    of FT is also likely to raise the value of these specimens (at least in relation to
    non-FT), so those already collecting will have more value in their sets.

    It's a safe bet I'll be looking at dimes more closely and will assemble the nicest
    into a real collection.



    Tempus fugit.
  • Nope, already have a full set of Roosevelts.
  • ccrdragonccrdragon Posts: 2,697
    Been working on Roosies for awhile already - the new designation just puts a little more of a spot light on the series.
    Cecil
    Total Copper Nutcase - African, British Ships, Channel Islands!!!
    'Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup'
  • nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    Nope. I have a complete BU set of raw roosies and a nearly complete circulated set in raw. Some are awesome, some are pretty good. I also have a couple certified ones that are really nice to look at. So unless I find very nice examples I want to slab, I'm keeping them out of slabs.
  • MadMonkMadMonk Posts: 3,743
    No, not really. I will not actively seek them. I mainly buy for eye appeal.
    Anything else is a bonus, and at this stage of my life, and collection, for me, it wouldnt be money wisely spent.
    Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
  • baccarudabaccaruda Posts: 2,588 ✭✭
    well i looked at my 6 old silver roosevelts yesterday and they're either all FT or none are FT. they all looked the same to me. some strikes were better than others but exactly what are the qualifications?

    FBLs, FSBs, FS are understandable (but i would never pay extra for) and i can see the difference. is this something you'll need an electron microscope to see? so far the only sense i can make of this is the huge amount of resubmission fees the grading companies are going to receive.

    this designation makes FBLs, FSBs, and FS even LESS attractive to me now - assuming those designations were probably marketing ploys too.


    edit- actually i've already just barely started the unloved Roosevelt set. Hopefully this makes the value of non-FT coins go down even further image
    1 Tassa-slap
    2 Cam-Slams!
    1 Russ POTD!
  • the only reason I'd ever collect Roosie's is for the toll booth
  • jeffnpcbjeffnpcb Posts: 1,943
    imageWell if some people are in a tissy over Full Torch, drop the program along with Full split Bands on Winged liberty Dimes! Went through three rolls of Roosevelt dimes, 1 in 1948P and two 1958P's and they were poorly struck for general circulation type coins. They are as difficult as FSB's and FBL's on Franklins.
    In clads, there are very few even graded. It is a new area of collecting for high grade MS Roosevelt dimes and may be expensive to complete.image
    HEAD TUCKED AND ROLLING ALONG ENJOYING THE VIEW! [Most people I know!]

    NEVER LET HIPPO MOUTH OVERLOAD HUMMINGBIRD BUTT!!!

    WORK HARDER!!!!
    Millions on WELFARE depend on you!
  • BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I will probably not change any of my collecting preferences just because a grading service starts to recognize some specific attribute of a certain type of coin.

    I WILL probably continue to seek high quality coins for my collection, and have always preferred well-struck coins to poorly struck coins.

    that said, my holdings of FT Roosies will probably come up for sale soon, as I forsee an excellent selling opportunity in the next few months, as populations of FT coins will be low and a certain segment of the collecting public will very likely seek these coins out.

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • jomjom Posts: 3,459 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I sure hope people don't just start collecting a series because PCGS puts a designation on a slab. I find that idea absurd.....

    jom

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file