I'm just as much a newb at figuring this stuff as you are, but I've got to go with AT on this one. To my eye, the coin doesn't have the spectrum of colors it should, they look like they slop over exactly in the same places with the same pattern from the obverse on to the reverse, the shift is too abrupt and they look too "painted on" for lack of a better word. Just doesn't look right.
But, I could be dead wrong and actually hope that I am.
I knew it was most likely AT when I bought it. But the colors were so pretty. My collection is getting large. Mostly toned coins. I am starting my 4th slab box now. Having lots of fun doing it and my hubby is coming around. He likes the comm. silver coins though, bright and shiny.
Sorry guys, but I really hate to encourage the coin doctors to keep doing this stuff.
Beyond the fraud factor, there is a concept among old time collectors that we have a responsibility to preserve coins as well as possible for future generations to enjoy. Each time you artificially tone a coin it oxidizes more medal and reduces mint luster if there was any there from the beginning. Each time one dips the AT off, more metal is removed from the coin.
Toning has always been a favorite among some collectors, but artificial toning has never been widely admired or respected among advanced collectors.
Everyone is free to do what they want with their own property, but still rankles me to see coins toned and stripped and toned and stripped again just to provide a comparatively short term bit a pleasure to the current owner.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Comments
I'm just as much a newb at figuring this stuff as you are, but I've got to go with AT on this one. To my eye, the coin doesn't have the spectrum of colors it should, they look like they slop over exactly in the same places with the same pattern from the obverse on to the reverse, the shift is too abrupt and they look too "painted on" for lack of a better word. Just doesn't look right.
But, I could be dead wrong and actually hope that I am.
Russ, NCNE
I would not send it in.
Brian.
Frank
Lori
Beyond the fraud factor, there is a concept among old time collectors that we have a responsibility to preserve coins as well as possible for future generations to enjoy. Each time you artificially tone a coin it oxidizes more medal and reduces mint luster if there was any there from the beginning. Each time one dips the AT off, more metal is removed from the coin.
Toning has always been a favorite among some collectors, but artificial toning has never been widely admired or respected among advanced collectors.
Everyone is free to do what they want with their own property, but still rankles me to see coins toned and stripped and toned and stripped again just to provide a comparatively short term bit a pleasure to the current owner.
They also recommended NGC as the best chance for getting in a slab (but I guess if ANACS thought artifical color they would net grade it to XF45?)
Nice coin, I just didn't feel like going higher on it - I still love the reverse.