BJ has made a post on the Registry forum

Zerbe

About the sticker poll.

kieferscoins

Link

Cameron Kiefer

Dog97

I don't have a clue.........
Just what in the heck is the <<<proposed sticker issue?>>>

kieferscoins

You submit a NGC coin to be graded by PCGS and they sticker it with a grade and it would be able to be registered in the PCGS registry without a PCGS holder. You could have a NGC 65 coin graded by PCGS as a 64 and keep it in the 65 holder, yet be a 64 in the PCGS registry.

Cameron Kiefer

goose3

<< <i>I don't have a clue.........
Just what in the heck is the <<<proposed sticker issue?>>> >>




yet another angle on the "game" where you will pay for PCGS to downgrade %80 of your NGC slabs for the
privilege of entering them into the PCGS registry.

Geoman

May be a good idea, however, I think things are already complicated enough. Adding more rules and policies, may make things worse, and not better.

Dog97

Thanks for refreshing my memory! I had forgotten about the poll. I voted NO in the poll. Something about thinking it was stupid to pay PCGS to grade NGC's plastic.
So what's everybody gonna do? Send their coins to NGC like they are saying because PCGS is too tight, get the higher NGC grade, then turn around and pay PCGS to put in their Registry Set at a lower grade? hahahahahaha

nucklehead

I'm surprised pcgs has'nt jumped all over that idea,more submission money for them.

IrishMike

Thanks Dog97, I need a chuckle today.

leothelyon

So what's everybody gonna do? Send their coins to NGC like they are saying because PCGS is too tight, get the higher NGC grade, then turn around and pay PCGS to put in their Registry Set at a lower grade? hahahahahaha

I got a kick out of that too. lol
Time to go eat chinese food.

Leo

VonZipper

Would they count those in the registry population count also?