Are these DCAM? Thanks
Ogden
Posts: 435 ✭
Bought these yesterday specifically looking for DCAM's. Hope they are. Thanks for helping.
Ogden
Ogden
0
Comments
al h.
Ogden
I don't think that either of Kennedy half dollars would qualify.
1. CAM
2. DCAM --
3. CAM - maybe DCAM
Michael
The Lincoln cent store:
http://www.lincolncent.com
My numismatic art work:
http://www.cdaughtrey.com
USAF veteran, 1986-1996 :: support our troops - the American way.
We have no reverse scans, and that is an important part of the designation. I'll bet a dollar to a donut the reverse on the '71 ain't there.
Russ, NCNE
I'll double Russ's bet. I'm afraid the trouble with 71 JFK's is not the obverse. The Jeff is a no brainer obverse, but the scuff will impair the grade. Still, they look like nice coins.
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
you performed quite a task to find a weak 1979 if that one isn't DCAM. that's normally a very heavy year, at least the sets i look through are. the trouble with the early 70's is finding matched cameo. generally the obverse will be OK. i'd say from the scans you provided that the jefferson is most definitely DCAM but the light reflection on the half dollars is pretty bad, though they look DCAM. a definite maybe on the kennedy's!!
al h.
Ogden
Ogden
The Lincoln cent store:
http://www.lincolncent.com
My numismatic art work:
http://www.cdaughtrey.com
USAF veteran, 1986-1996 :: support our troops - the American way.
Ogden
Ogden
1971 was a b*tch. The obverse is cam/dcam. The reverse is no cam. If it'll make you feel better, I have about 100 like that I've purchased looking for the 71 dcam. To asnwer your other question, a PR69 Dcam 1971 JFK would be a $2500+ coin. Happy hunting.
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
Thanks again
Ogden
<< <i>If it'll make you feel better, I have about 100 like that I've purchased looking for the 71 dcam. >>
Ogden,
I'll make you feel twice as good. Me too! The mint was friggin' terrible that year. Probably because it was the first year they struck the JFK in clad.
The coin in 68DCAM has a pop of only 110 and goes for $200 +. The coin in 69DCAM has a pop of only 17 and the last one to come up for sale (July, 2002) went for $3627. There are no 70s.
Russ, NCNE
Thanks keets, copper, russ and dheath and all the other who helped me. In the five months I have listened on this forum I have learned a great deal. Thanks to all.
Ogden
The art of taking good pictures of coins will take alot of time and patience. Stick with it and read up and try different technics. Having the right camera may help. The trick is to position and bounce the right amount of light onto the coin and back into the lens of the camera. This is not an easy task as the light source and camera needs to occupy the same space above the coin. When you angle the light to get out of the way of the camera, you will notice that you will need to then angle the camera in the opposite direction you went with the light to catch the light rays coming off the coin. Too much angle will make the coin to look like an egg or oblong. Over time, you'll experience all these problems and go through all the frustrations but don't give up as you'll eventually find something that works best for you. Doing a search on picture(s), cameras, photo's, photography, lights, lighting and other words through the archive of forum topics, suggestions given by many forum members will help.
Good luck,
Leo
Pictures
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection