Remember that UGLY '60-S $3 awhile back...it isn't!

barney

Whining session over...I like my new $3 '60-S NGC XF-45...the scan was terrible, the coin looks great! The wear is there but it seems
the relief is higher than the '74 that I looked at; perhaps that is why it showed wear more quickly. Any $3 experts know anything about
this? I'm sure that is why NGC gave it a 45 grade. The luster IS there, the fields are clean, no ugly toning. This is a nice coin.

Thanks,
Barney

barney

here's the ugly picture again:


http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=527&item=803331362&rd=1

There is no ugly toning. Just very nice fields and darker toning within the legend on the obverse.

Thanks,
Barney

kieferscoins

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=527&item=803331362&rd=1

Cameron Kiefer