Who are the people who buy $50,000.00; $100,000.00, $150,000.00 coins and up?
braddick
Posts: 23,975 ✭✭✭✭✭
I've always wondered who these people are. I don't really see them at local shows. Certainly I haven't heard of anyone who buys coins on a regular basis with these pricetags join us here.
Who are these people? Are they collectors or investors? Do they buy these high priced Monster coins for their appeal or for their storage for value?
I've always wondered about that, and a Thread linking a PCGS PR66DCAM 1895 Morgan got me to thinking about it even more.
Does anyone know?
Who are these people? Are they collectors or investors? Do they buy these high priced Monster coins for their appeal or for their storage for value?
I've always wondered about that, and a Thread linking a PCGS PR66DCAM 1895 Morgan got me to thinking about it even more.
Does anyone know?
peacockcoins
0
Comments
We have several members that purchase coins in this range. Without much thinking I can come up with 5 non-dealer members that purchase coins in this range.
Thanksgiving National Battlefield Coin Show is November 29-30, 2024 at the Eisenhower Allstar Sportsplex, Gettysburg, PA. Tables are available. WWW.AmericasCoinShows.com
I hate it when you see my post before I can edit the spelling.
Always looking for nice type coins
my local dealer
In my experience, there are a whole lot more wealthy people that dress in jeans/tennis shoes than go around in Rolex's and fancy suits.
I know of at least 5-10 on this forum that purchase coins in that price range.
Speaking of expensive coins, are you looking at the 1884 in the Bowers sale or is that hole filled already??
I already own the Eliasberg coin (NGC PF66). It took me 5 years, but I finally reunited the two Eliasberg trade dollar rarities!
1884
1885
Beautiful - thanks for sharing them!
b.
A Tax is a fine for doing good.
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
Total Copper Nutcase - African, British Ships, Channel Islands!!!
'Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup'
i sure as heck wouldn't walk around w/ cash like that.
K S
David
"...the guy looked like a goofball otherwise".
I resent that...It was a money case not a suitcase.
The 1885 was submitted for crossover a few years back and didn't cross. The 1884 I have not submitted, although I do believe that it would cross. But I kind of like having them in matching holders.
Obscurum per obscurius
collectors/investors
and sometimes more often than not lots of cash to hide
sincerely michael
I'll bet $1,000 if you sell the coins they will cross for the next owner.
Just like the 1913 nickel and the 1936 dot cent
Stewart
The question at hand is one of technical grade vs "ranking" grade. The 1885, by PCGS standards, is technically a Proof 65 and I don't dispute that fact. However, it seems that most of the ultra rarities are "ranked" rather than technically graded. The Eliasberg 1913 nickel is a good example. I technically graded that coin as a PF64, but hadn't seen any of the others. Since then I've seen two in person and pictures of the fourth and definitely agree that the Eliasberg coin is superior to the other specimens. Having it "ranked" on top at PF66 is consistent with the "ranking" that seems to go on with some of the other rarities. Take the 1804 dollars for instance: is the Childs coin a technical PF68 - no, not really. Nor is the King of Siam coin technically a PF67 or the Eliasberg coin technically a PF65 or the Dexter coin a PF64. But they certainly are "ranked" correctly, and the starting grade takes a back seat to the "ranking" grade.
Since all my Proof trade dollars are PF66, it's somewhat important to me that it stay in the holder it's in to maintain a matched set. It's the finest and it's top ranked - whether it's top ranked as a 66 or a 65 is immaterial in the long run. I'm just happy to have the coin!
Lakesammman: Within reason, that's true. Certainly a half a grade means nothing for an ultra rarity. The services fight over certain coins, but the 1885 just doesn't get the same respect. It used to steam me, but I'm way over it. When I took the Eliasberg 1884 to the safe deposit box and held it next to the 1885, any worries about what grade they were or what holder they resided in just melted all away! Now I just enjoy the coins and leave the holder fighting to others.
<< <i>and sometimes more often than not lots of cash to hide >>
Drug dealers. Didn't some agency dig up a bunch of buried gold coins - many of which were slabbed, a few years ago.
And then there was the DEA sale that Heritage conducted about a decade ago. I don't remember the exact reason for the sale, but I probably still have the catalog.
Cameron Kiefer
The story I saw on TV was about an embezzler who buried slabbed double eagles, Kurgerrands, and other gold. I haven't heard of drug dealers doing the same, but it wouldn't suprise me.
I collect Canadian silver coins to stay above suspicion.
Obscurum per obscurius
TDN - Since we're on the subject of grade vs.ranking grade......but this thread is on coins of $50,000 and higher
Do you think that even $5,000 and $10,000 coins should be graded on a ranking decision.So if we have a coin with a pop 8 in ms 67 should the best one be a 68? I would agree with that system.It is absurd to state that there is such a wide spectrum of quality within the same grade.
stewart
I agree with you the ranking should be associated with the $5K to $10K coins as well but you are opening up such a huge can of worms that PCGS will never go fo it. Think about how many coins fall into this group. Every top 10 Lincoln, Washington, Merc, etc. With so many coins in this range it would be near impossible to accomplish in 20 years.
The thing about the classic rarities is that for the most part the grades are all known - certified or uncertified.
One spot I was detecting produced a 1792 half disme and a 1796 quarter.
Then the dang alarm clock went off.
It always does.