Home U.S. Coin Forum

at what grade does the luster vanish

Just curious to get a statistic. On average, going downward from mint state, at what grade does the average coin basically lose all its luster? xf, vf?
USPI minimalist design collage
image
designset
Treasury Seals Type Set

Comments

  • nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    Usually in EF there is very little luster remaining or none at all. Although in some cases it is possible for an AU coin to have no luster (depending on the condition of the dies, etc.). So I'll say EF is where luster is virtually gone. By VF it should all be gone.
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    down to xf-40, some luster ought to be present, maybe just barely hidden between the letteres, etc. at vf-35, as a rule of thumb, no luster is present.

    grading pointer: % presence of luster is more important to the grade on bust coins & copper than presence of detail above vf-35.

    K S
  • Ef45 coins will have a touch of luster in protected areas where a EF40 usually will not. Gold is different and will keep keep luster to VF or so.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,964 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The rule of thumb is that all mint luster is gone at EF-40. An EF-45 might and usually does have mint luster in the protected areas such as the letters.

    Here’s a wrinkle for you. Sometimes a weak strike can make a coin appear to be a lower grade than it is. Here’s a case in point. Years ago I purchased this 1796 dime (attached pictures) as a VF-30. By the strictest standards, the obverse hair detail would indicate that, but this coin was struck with a worn obverse die (very late date state) and for that reason the hair detail never was there. The obverse and the reverse both have a fair amount of mint luster in the protected areas.

    What would it grade if I sent to PCGS? Someday I’ll have to find the answer to that when it comes out of my collection. I couldn’t see it coming back in less than an EF-40 holder, and don’t laugh, but I have seen coins that were NOT EVEN CLOSE to this piece in AU-55 holders. Care to speculate?
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    That is one beautiful dime! What's going on there to the left of the date connected to the rim? Great looking dame!
  • boy that's a toughie. Nice cud at bottom btw. How's the rim at top? Wear is more important than strike for circ pieces. I'd go xf-40 even though the strike shows vf detail.
    USPI minimalist design collage
    image
    designset
    Treasury Seals Type Set
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,964 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The cud at the left of the date is on all known examples of this die variety. This is Davis variety #1 of the 1796 dimes, which is by far the most common variety for the date. The little mark at 12 o'clock on the obverse is a tiny planchet defect that doesn't amount to anything. The coin has adjustment marks (file marks that reflect the removal of excess metal at the mint to get the coin down to the lawful weight) on the reverse at that same spot. If they had not been there, the dies probably would have removed that little mark.

    You must remember that this was one of the first dimes the U.S. Mint made, and this one was from the first set of dies. Therefore a lot of them were less than perfect.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    the absurdity of grading open-collar coins is that plastic companies grade by details only. i have a 1824 bust half that i cracked out of ngc xf-45 - and it has virtually complete luster in to the fields!!! it correctly grades au-55 or better, because the variety comes weak. i have had a lot of bargains on under-graded bust halves in plastic.

    K S
  • numobrinumobri Posts: 1,473 ✭✭✭
    I own many Bust dollars in VF that sill has some luster on them,these are the high end VF's.
    NUMO
  • Luster isnt skin deep!
    You can fool man but you can't fool God! He knows why you do what you do!
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,637 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The depth of the luster varies from year to year and series to series. There is also
    variability in it's hardness (wear characteristics) and some individual variability in
    the way that the coin wears. There are F's with traces of luster and AU's with none.
    Generally in the clads the luster disappears in VF+, but some dates like the 1972-D
    will keep it much longer and take longer to wear down.
    Tempus fugit.
  • numobrinumobri Posts: 1,473 ✭✭✭
    Isn't luster from the facets created on the surface of the coin during the stamping?If these facets are on the surface,how is luster not skin deep?Just woundering.
    NUMO
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,964 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, luster is the reflection of the metal flow that results when the coin is struck. It's the first thing to go when a coin is worn, and it can't be restored. I guess you would say that it is "skin deep."
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • numobrinumobri Posts: 1,473 ✭✭✭
    Thanks,thought i was missing something, and i hate being late for dinner.
    NUMO
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,964 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Here's and example of the Draped Bust design when it is well struck and near Mint State. This was the first early U.S. coin I ever purchased, and it got me hooked.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • numobrinumobri Posts: 1,473 ✭✭✭
    Awesome,i'll take it.
    NUMO
  • nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    Really nice dime! I wish I could afford some!
  • UncleJoeUncleJoe Posts: 2,536 ✭✭✭
    EF shouldn't be a problem. AU on the other would be a tough sell for me.

    Regardless, a very nice coin indeed.

    Joe.

    Edit: To answer the question, by EF-40 the luster is usually gone.
    High end EF's may still show some luster. If they show a lot of luster they are usually AU.

    Joe.
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    the 1805 dime looks au++ to me (details).

    K S
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,964 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, this coin is solid AU-58/53. The reverse darker, and I'll add it to the post.

    With all due respece, Uncle Joe, if you have any early U.S. coins like this that you can't sell for AU Gray Sheet money, please contact me. I'm a buyer. I'm going to be out next week so don't dispair. If you can't sell them, I'll take them off your hands. No bull!!
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Judging by a lot of the Walkers I've looked at while trying to build my short set, I'd say it vanishes at MS64. Amazing how many overdipped coins are in these holders.

    Russ, NCNE
  • UncleJoeUncleJoe Posts: 2,536 ✭✭✭
    BillJones, I was referring to the 1796 not the 1805.

    Joe.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,964 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If the grading services didn't grade dipped coins, they would have very little material to grade. The problem is that are so many collectors who refuse to buy anything with toning on it. Some dealers joke that they must belong to the KKK. WHITE COINS only PLEASE!

    A couple of weeks ago I had 1932-S quarter in PCGS MS-64. It had fully original surfaces and had never been dipped. The coin was not beautiful, but it was not ugly either. The first comment one collector made was, "It's a shame that coin is in the holder. It should have been dipped before it was put in there." OK then it would be white and duller and probably be ready for another dipping in a decade or so.

    If you leave a natural coin alone and store it properly it won't change much in your lifetime. I've owned 1805 dime that I have pictured on the front page of this string for over 30 years, and it looks the same as the day I bought it. I've owned the 1796 for almost 20 years, and it has not changed either.

    Some guys don't understand things even to that level. They think that these older white coins are original and have not been dipped. As long as collectors demand white coins, more coins are going to get dipped. And so long as some collectors go ga-ga over some types of toning, the more AT coins there will be. As so long as both mentalities continue more coins will be permanently down graded to suit poorly informed collector tastes.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • mdwoodsmdwoods Posts: 5,546 ✭✭✭
    Bill, I looked at your dime (96). You can tell from the stars on the right obverse that the coin has seen very little circulation. IMO of course. I could easily see how someone who gave it a quick glance might think different. It seems like a grade review might help in this case. In any event, it is a neat coin. Mark
    National Register Of Big Trees

    We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    billjones, you are 100%, no make that 10000% exactly right on.

    K S
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,964 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Both the 1796 and 1805 dimes are raw. No grading service has ever seen them. Some day they will.

    I'll tell you a interesting story about dipping. About 5 years ago I had a 1796 dime in PCGS MS-62 holder. It was a beautiful coin with original blue toning. Back then PCGS used to undergrade early coins now and then because they really had not seen that many of them.

    I really wanted to keep it, but at $7 to $8 grand I just couldn't afford to do that. I sold it a dealer who cracked it out and dipped it. I could have told him that was bad idea because the toning was really old and it was "set." Well several years later he told me that he had lost money on that piece.

    Dhah!!! Well if you make bad choices bad things can happen. There might be original a white 1796 dime out there, but if there is it's one rare devil. If you expect to find one that has not been dipped I've got a few 1804 dollars that were really struck in 1804 to sell you from the Gallery Mint. The old collectors said it best: an old coin should look old.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Hey Bill, I have some IHCs you would love, they look every bit their age!
    You can fool man but you can't fool God! He knows why you do what you do!
  • ARCOARCO Posts: 4,396 ✭✭✭✭✭
    According to most Ebay sellers, luster can still be present at the lowly grade of Good. image
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,964 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, polishing will do that. Lacquer works too.

    Ebay = Buyer Beware
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file