How about a dipped coin that has retoned naturally?
oldcameoproofsguy
Posts: 3,174 ✭
Several of the forum members and I have talked about dipped coins that have re-toned nicely. There are many collectors that would argue that there is nothing wrong with a dipped coin that has re-toned and that this should not affect the value of a coin much especially if the coin has really great eye appeal. There are others that say that the coin should have greatly reduced value because the coin lacks originality. I am just curious to see what your views on this subject are.
0
Comments
Frank
For me if I even suspect it has retoned I will pass on it. As Baseball said, we might not know for sure maybe an educated guess. But thats good enough for me. I'm one as you know in the barber series I like original. Now maybe it might not look as pretty to some people.
But to me it does when you know how to look at it.
Before I knew better I have bought some retoned pieces. And again I'm not slamming these. It's just been part of the learning process for me.
Stman
easy way to tell if a coin is retoned: if it is a morgan or seated coin, or something of that vintage, & it is blast white, it's dipped, plain & simple.
K S
unless the gas dipped them before they put them imto the holder
i do not think they did to my understanding i could be mistaken though
but usually any blast white morgan and especially so seated coin is dipped!
sincerely michael
interesting followup to this: about 2 shows ago, there was a dealer that had used to "make" 1964 year sets, by dipping the coins, & putting them in cardboard holders. he had 1 for sale that he said was a forgotten "leftover" that had been laying around for years, & all 10 coins had stunning rainbows on them, the cent included. even russ would have been drooling, i think.
K S
Walt
<< <i>Dipped coins never retone with all those pretty colors >>
Wrong. I have an EF45 1827 Bust half that I dipped as a kid, back, in the late '70's. The secondary toning it has received in the decades since is quite pretty; iridescent hints of pink and blue and violet over medium to dark grey toning overall.
But this is probably the exception to the rule.
<< <i>This may be a little off subject but ...I have heard that pcgs will dip a coin before the put it in a holder. Especially mercury dimes. I have one or two mercs with a little bit on gold toning. So my question is if I send these in for reholdering, will they dip it ?
Walt >>
I've seen that question asked before. The answer is no. They won't dip it without you explicitly involved in the process. If they did, they are altering your coin and would be liable to pay you for any damages.
Neil
K S
Walt
And how do you think those gsa morgans were stored for all those years? Same way most other morgans were, in bags. So it's dumb to claim all white morgans have been dipped, except the gsa's, IMO. The coins on the outside of the bag react with the sulphur, protecting the coins in the middle of the bag, which can stay white. Same way the intercept shield product works.
K S
Now you guys are talking coin doctoring & AT.
A rainbow VF or XF will NG.
I'll agree with the Wayte Raymond method.
(I think) if you do what crito said you will get those funky blue & green colors that scream AT.
Original tone makes a patina on the surface of the coin that a dipped & retoned coin won't have. I'll admit I don't know that for a fact but that is what the toner experts said when Anaconda's ANACS graded whatever kind of Commem it was, was discussed here as being AT.
Now true we may not know for sure all the time, but if I suspect it's not original, or if someone is looking for me and suspects it's not original, thats good enough for myself and I pass. In the barber series I collect they are tough to find that are true original. But I'll hold out for the right one. And turn down the others.
Stman
You can retone a coin with monster colors easily. I can show 500 of them on eBay right now. Some of them are very pretty. They are all raw or in ACG slabs.
Color that was induced rapidly from a stripped / dipped coin probably does
tone in a different fashion as the `original / or mint bag /album /mint set etc.. toning`
From what If read,and seen in some cases,is the 1st,or original toned coins,the toning is
flat on the coin,were as the second toned coin,the toning appears to float above the surface of the coin when viewed at certain angles.
That may not be in all cases but its true for some.
K S
Dipped/cleaned coins can develope great color in the right enviorment, look at the Benson coins. Again not AT IMHO. K
My 1866 Philly Mint Set
K S
Obscurum per obscurius
I know that old timers used a cyanide solution to clean their coins. There are many 19th century proofs that exhibiting beautiful toning but have hairlines from past cleanings. And yes, there are also old proofs that are unattractively, darkly toned too.
Your thoughts and theories please.
Some folks don't like them, Some do. Sure some are medium- dark toned. But just because you can't see the wild colors doesn't mean it's ugly. Also tilting these pieces you get the color.
Stman
Yes - many times you can tell even when a beautiful coin has been dipped and retoned.
Proof - Benson Collection
I guess a coin can reacquire its "originality" after dipping if it sits tucked away untouched for 50+ years in a Wayte Raymond holder (any of you that patient?). Even though most of the Benson coins were attractively toned, those coins that were overdipped lost all of their patina (see Dog's comment) and acquired that chromy look. Those coins went for less money because they were less attractive, not because anyone was claiming they weren't original.
However, the answer is yes: PCGS does dip coins.
If the color is not too dark, I don't have a problem with it. I bought a MS 64 Capped Bust Dime from Bowers that was dipped & retoned with the cobalt blue and light brown & am quite happy with it.
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."