Your opinions on the grade of this two cent piece please.
Russ
Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
Got another one in today:
I'm thinking EF40. Am I way off or close?
Russ, NCNE
I'm thinking EF40. Am I way off or close?
Russ, NCNE
0
Comments
edited to add, I was thinking vf rather that ef because the WE looks a bit weak.
According the PCGS's grading bible, a little weakness is allowed on WE for the EF grade. Actually, what it says is that the WE will have "noticeable wear". Of course, I sometimes wonder if they pay any attention to their own book. The thing over the S is a ding that, for some reason, the scanner made look like a bump and more prominent than it actually is.
Russ, NCNE
the detail on the WE is going to sway the grade one way or the other between VF and XF - I always thought you had to have a pretty strong WE to get into XF but I might be wrong.
Frank
One thing I see that I find interesting if it isn't a photo thing is I can clearly see a 1 above the date and to the left.
i'm afraid that you are eventually going to find yourself with a bunch of these strange coins that have no picture of JFK. you will have a stamp made and start counterstamping a recognizable portrait onto these things.
if it isn't already happening.
looks vf close to ef to me.
I tried looking online and found this info but I can't understand it.
info
If i had to guess I would say it matches the 1865 Fancy 5 DmgD- damaged D (on all coins below)
1865 Fnc5 TriplDate first 18 high.
Damaged D, D of UNITED lacks upper serif.
It's a scanner artifact that magnified a ding. You got me all excited for a minute.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>Got another one in today:
I'm thinking EF40. Am I way off or close?
Russ, NCNE >>
russ, it looks closer to a vf
Oh well.. still looks like a fancy 5 damaged D version to me. No idea if they are rare.
There is a chance that this coin really is an EF-40 if the "WE" is weakly struck and the rest of coin qualifies for the grade. I'd have to see it in person to confirt that however.
The "WE" can often be close to flat due to strike. The ribbon is important too. There's too much wear here, I would not grade either of these as XF.
Coyn
K S