Home U.S. Coin Forum

Your opinions on the grade of this two cent piece please.

RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
Got another one in today:

imageimage

I'm thinking EF40. Am I way off or close?

Russ, NCNE

Comments

  • LanLordLanLord Posts: 11,714 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm not an expert on these, but I was thinking vf. What is after the 2 (over the s in cents)? Is that a period or is it only on my screen?
    edited to add, I was thinking vf rather that ef because the WE looks a bit weak.
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Lanlord,

    According the PCGS's grading bible, a little weakness is allowed on WE for the EF grade. Actually, what it says is that the WE will have "noticeable wear". Of course, I sometimes wonder if they pay any attention to their own book.image The thing over the S is a ding that, for some reason, the scanner made look like a bump and more prominent than it actually is.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Russ:

    the detail on the WE is going to sway the grade one way or the other between VF and XF - I always thought you had to have a pretty strong WE to get into XF but I might be wrong.

    Frank
  • PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
    I will guess 40.
    One thing I see that I find interesting if it isn't a photo thing is I can clearly see a 1 above the date and to the left. image
  • zennyzenny Posts: 1,547 ✭✭
    Russ
    i'm afraid that you are eventually going to find yourself with a bunch of these strange coins that have no picture of JFK. you will have a stamp made and start counterstamping a recognizable portrait onto these things.






    if it isn't already happening.



    looks vf close to ef to me.
  • PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
    Maybe someone withh a book on these could tell you if it's a known variety.
    I tried looking online and found this info but I can't understand it.

    info

    If i had to guess I would say it matches the 1865 Fancy 5 DmgD- damaged D (on all coins below)
    1865 Fnc5 TriplDate first 18 high.
    Damaged D, D of UNITED lacks upper serif.
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Placid,

    It's a scanner artifact that magnified a ding. You got me all excited for a minute.image

    Russ, NCNE
  • CLASSICSCLASSICS Posts: 1,164 ✭✭


    << <i>Got another one in today:

    imageimage

    I'm thinking EF40. Am I way off or close?

    Russ, NCNE >>

    russ, it looks closer to a vf
  • PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
    A scanner artifact? Sure looks like a 1 to me it even appears raised, stupid photos.
    Oh well.. still looks like a fancy 5 damaged D version to me. No idea if they are rare.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,964 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The classic grade would be VF-30. Today this coin is at least a EF-40 if it's in a slab. The "WE" can be missing thess days, and these coins get called Fine or even VF. I guess that's what is know as grade inflation.

    There is a chance that this coin really is an EF-40 if the "WE" is weakly struck and the rest of coin qualifies for the grade. I'd have to see it in person to confirt that however.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • I've collected a lot of 2 cent pieces. There is a good book out on them which identifies a ton of varieties non of which are particularly rare or valuable.(Myron Kliman)

    The "WE" can often be close to flat due to strike. The ribbon is important too. There's too much wear here, I would not grade either of these as XF.

    Coyn
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    XF-ish in my book.

    K S

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file