Rick M. chat, post questions to new Q&A forum!
DHeath
Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
Thanks to Carol, who carried our message and starting the ball rolling, Rick M. has agreed to spend a little time with us in chat one evening soon. One of the things Carol asked for was perhaps a list of questions that could be asnwered in advance, thereby setting up the discussion time for followup questions. If you are interested in this discussion, please take a minute to post your questions.
Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
0
Comments
What techniques does a grader use to determine AU-58 from MS and specifically what are the areas of a coin to look at? Obviously, it will have to be a bit general since each series has its own characteristics.
al h.
3037911
3022268
Why doesn't someone from PCGS (such as a grader) regularly post and contribute to some of the threads on the Coin board and Registry board?
Cameron Kiefer
Seriously, can you discuss the graders' approach to differentiating between a weak strike and wear. Are key date/high value coins graded under the same time constraints as moderns and other common coins?
When will PCGS start to distinguish between type 1, type 2 and type 3 of the 1972 IKE dollars?? I can submit 8 of them for grading as soon as you say so. Thank you for your time.
Does the shipping department open the box, prepare it for the grader?
Grader Grades
Grader enters the grading info into the computer
Grader sents it to be slabbed
coin is labeled and slabbed
sent to shipping to be packaged and sent out
-Thanks!
-David
-David
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
B.
A Tax is a fine for doing good.
They do. They just want to remain anonymous. If they actually posted who they were they'd probably be flooded with PMs asking all sorts of questions.
The paycheck's the same with or without the abuse.
peacockcoins
To my knowledge Rick is the only one who has come on and posted, under his own name.
I picked Rick's logo. I've always thought that if you are an employee you should use the logo. Unfortunately I can't lock out non- employees' from using it.
Carol
The next thing you will accuse us of, is being mean and nasty to one another. I will have you know
that this Forum is composed of nothing but sunshine, birds singing and the smell of fresh flowers.
I hope you feel ashamed for not having the faith. We like all coin graders. We like em ; broasted ,roasted, toasted, sushi style. fricasied,shish-ka-bobed, carmalized,
baked, broiled, fried, poached, stewed, braised, smoked, pickled, boiled , blanched, seared and BBQd.
Bear
Camelot
Computer Services
What did the doe say when she came out of the woods?.....Last time I do THAT for a buck!
Rick - Will you look at ALL the coins in the Indian cent " Showdown"
I have never seen you on the bourse floor in Long Beach.
Can I persuade you to make an appearance and look at the
display ?
The early NGC holders had a problem especially causing copper to turn.Their holders were changed.Has PCGS ever experienced copper coins to turn in the holder because of the plastic or the gasket ?
Stewart
THanks
Allen (toners)
Proud member of TCCS!
Another question I would have is what criteria does it take to become a PCGS grader. I'm not looking for employment information, but rather the types of tests and procedures graders go through in order to qualify themselves for a particular coin series as a grader. And as a corollary to that, whether those procedures/tests can be turned into a product (hint, hint) that we can buy and become expert graders in the series we are interested in.
Neil
You are a man possessed of a powerful intellect. How do I know? You asked the question I was going to ask.
Russ, NCNE
In the trade dollar series there are two dates notorious for being weakly struck on the stars - the 1877 circulation strike and the 1880 proof.
The 1877 is found weakly struck on 99% of the coins extent, the 1880 on perhaps 30-40%. I have seen 1877's that were stone cold MS65-66 coins but, of course, were weakly struck on the stars and were in PCGS MS64 holders. I have been told that in order to be considered for MS65, the stars must be fully struck. Is this true? Even for a date that is 99% of the time weakly struck? What if the coin were more fully struck than 98% of the coins of this date (but still had a few stars flat? Note that I've seen extremely high grade examples (of other dates) with a few stars weak - where is the line drawn?
If it is true that the coin must be fully struck for MS65, then why have I seen PCGS PF66 and PF67 examples of the 1880 proof with weakly struck stars? It would seem to me that a full strike would be more important on a proof coin than on a business strike. Can you explain this to me, please!?! Thanks!
(belive me - I need to know - the population around here is getting rabid)
see? My Auctions "Got any 1800's gold?"
Proof Dime Registry Set