Your coin's pedigree, how important is it to you?
DAM
Posts: 2,410 ✭✭
I notice many Registry Sets list where the owner got their coins, a dealer, a forum member, an auction, etc. How important is it to keep the pedigree going. And when should it start?
Coins carry their pedigree especially when at auction. Some have have only a couple while others have many previous owners listed. Does this influence your decission about whether you are going to buy a coin or not? Especially if it's an Eliasberg, Newcomb, Childs, etc.
Not knowing how long dealers keep records I've often thought about trying to track down some of my coins previous owners to see where its roots are. Probably an impossible task. That's why I never tried I guess.
DAM
Coins carry their pedigree especially when at auction. Some have have only a couple while others have many previous owners listed. Does this influence your decission about whether you are going to buy a coin or not? Especially if it's an Eliasberg, Newcomb, Childs, etc.
Not knowing how long dealers keep records I've often thought about trying to track down some of my coins previous owners to see where its roots are. Probably an impossible task. That's why I never tried I guess.
DAM
Dan
0
Comments
Cameron kiefer
So, with that said. Does anyone else feel PCGS overgrades based of whom the previous or current ownership?
Tony
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
Dealer/Collector pedigree's are most useful when buying a coin. If it's from a dealer (ie: Eagle Eye Photo Seal) or collection I respect, then I'm much more likely to send for the coin (or go to the auction, etc). I cant tell you how many hundreds of dollars I've spent shipping substandard coins back to dealers. I've basically quit doing it!
Just kidding
I have one pedigreed piece, and it's not even on the holder. My Seated Half from 1858 was from the Evergreen collection (I sold my Walser Lincoln cent).
I think it would be neat to have a coin from a famous collection.
I think it would be neat to have a coin from a famous collection
Me too Brian. Someday I want to own an Eliasberg coin. Because I collect by type, it won't matter what denomination or date it is. Something that's not too expensive, I can tell you that. I just haven't seen the right one yet I guess.
I've watched his coins, since the auction, as they come up for sale. It's amazing how, in some cases, the person who bought the coin at auction really took a bath, compaired to what it's selling for now. I bet there was a lot of exitement at that auction.
Tony,
So, with that said. Does anyone else feel PCGS overgrades based of whom the previous or current ownership?
Since I was talking about the Eliasberg collection; after the auction (the non-gold coins in 1996/97) I noticed a lot of the coins in the catalog received a 1 grade bump when certified. Some received a 2 grade bump. Made me wonder whether the grading services got caught up in the excitement or if B&M intentionally undergraded so as not to be accused of trying to over hype the coins.
After reading some of the replies, I think I'll get off my butt and see about trying to track down pedigrees for a couple of my coins.
Thanks for your responses.
My local dealer knew I wanted one and picked up a MS65 example for me, and paid just a little over the MS65 price. He did note that trying for an upgrade would be risky, calling it right at the bottom for the grade.
Some day I would like to get a Bass piece, would love to have one of his pattern Liberty Nickel pieces.
Other than that, I do not collect the types of coins that really require keeping track of who owned them before.
Coins that I get from board members I always list since they usually give me a great deal and it becomes a win-win situation. I have also mentioned a few dealers who have worked with me and I felt that they should get some credit in helping my reach my goal of completion.
but in general it doesn't sway me one way or the other. It would be cool just to have one from each major collection just because of the history associated with it.
Rich
Very Interesting!
Tony
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
I was sitting behind Parrino when he bought the 1913 nickel. I was new to collecting and didn't know who this short guy with the Hawaiian shirt was. It didn't take long to learn. It was an exciting auction but your right, the prices were too high. It's like stocks - you don't realize the loss until you sell them.
Re: overgrading. Can you imagine this 1913 nickel showing up and the grading services claiming to NOT know who submitted it?? I can hear it now..."you don't want this coin in the OTHER guys holder, do you...?" It's the only way that coin graded so high.
By the way, is that a man on the nickel or a woman on steroids?? Sure would hate to meet her in a alley!
What do you guys think
"The Spooly Collection"
In God We Trust.... all others pay in Gold and Silver!
It has been my experience at auction, that if the consignor is living the auction house tends to overgrade and if the consignor is dead they undergrade.
I'll make you the same offer!
My "P65"s both came back P64's (lots 123, 130)- what was your experience with having them graded??
One of my favorite coins is an 1883 No Cents nickel from the Eliasberg collection.
It's only MS64 worth about $70 and I paid $260 for it just because of the pedigree.
It's great to own because it is a coin with TWO stories!
My posts viewed times
since 8/1/6
It has been my experience at auction, that if the consignor is living the auction house tends to overgrade and if the consignor is dead they undergrade
That's an interesting observation. Is it your opinion the same happened at the Eliasberg auction? I haven't done research to verify my theory. My comment was based on lots I followed and lots that came up for sale after the auction, that had been graded.
Still learning how to use the forum .... updates, info, etc ... I can be reached at Lakesammman@hotmail.com
With that said, I agree 100% with what Boiler78 had to say about NGC - they are just now recovering from that decision.
I didn't have a chance to view the coins except by catalog. I assumed there would be strong bids on many of the coins, but seeing coins selling for WAY over current prices had me baffled.
What would prompt B&M to undergrade the coins by so much? Were they trying to add additional electricity at the auction by having undergraded coins go for prices well over what they had estimated the grade to be?
Yours and boiler78's remarks make me think that way.