Home U.S. Coin Forum

Gold experts give me your opinion this $10 liberty-NGC grade is in

darktonedarktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
When I got home from work today there was a fed-ex package laying between the front door and the screen door. Anybody could have walked off with it so I was a little angry but when I opened it up all my anger went away when I layed my eyes on this $10 liberty.image mike
    1899 obverse
      reverse
        NGC has just posted the grade on thier website MS64. This makes me very happy.image

        Comments

        • I am no gold expert, but MS-63/64?

          Cameron Kiefer
        • boiler78boiler78 Posts: 3,057 ✭✭✭✭✭
          Assuming no high point wear not visible in the photo I'd say solid 63 shot 64. Is the color the same on both sides? The obverse has a rose color and the reverse is more of a lemon tone on my monitor? Looks like a nice coin
        • darktonedarktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
          boiler78- the color looks the same on both sides I must have just had it at a slightly different angle when I turned it around to take the pictures. No wear on this coin. The only real mark is the one seen on the cheek. It sure has nice clean fields! After I get some more opinions I let you know my guess on the grade and how much I paid for it. mike
          image
        • I am going to say MS-62, due to the chin ding, and the bagging on the reverse below the eagle. It's a very nice coin, but MS-63 is a very tough hurdle on Lib gold.
        • PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
          62 or 58. The rim has a lot of dings.

          My favorite year thou image
        • jomjom Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭✭✭
          I agree it's got rim dings but the coin is not AU as far as the picture shows. The grade could be market graded lower so who knows? To me it's at least a 62 and possibly a 63....assuming the luster is good.

          jom
        • orevilleoreville Posts: 11,953 ✭✭✭✭✭
          here is a MS-62 liberty slabbed by PCGS but the obverse pics is of poor quality to really be able to compare. The reverse pics is hopefully a little better for comparison sake.

          Obverse

          Reverse
          A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
        • pmh1nicpmh1nic Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭✭✭
          darktone

          Based on what I can see in the photograph I'd say NGC MS-64 and PCGS MS-63.

          Oreville

          That's the nicest gold MS-62 I've every seen. Again, based on what I see in the photograph that coins IMHO is seriously undergraded. The fields look very clean and there doesn't look like there is a mark anywhere on the cheek, neck, etc.
          The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
        • darktonedarktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
          I grade it a no problem MS64. But I have the advantage of having it in my hand. Here's a picture of one I just had graded MS62
            MS62
              slab
                So if this one grades MS62 my 1899 must be a MS66image. Mike image
              • MS63...image
              • darktone,

                Nice Lib--I'd give it a 62 or shot 63. The minor rim nicks and the nick on the chin don't bother me as much as the bag mark on the reverse. The luster looks nice though. But overall, too many marks to make it anything above 63. No spotting that I could see which is nice. I'd give it a solid 62 maybe NGC 63.

                -Hunter
                THE C0IN HUNTER:

                WANTED: I need these coins

                Always looking for PCGS buffs, 1917 SLQs, and pre-1933 GOLD.

                Check my want list above!!!
              • Well, you have the advantage being able to see it up close, I stand by my MS-62 guess, let us know how it comes back!
              • darktonedarktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
                jtryka- it came just in time to make it on a submission to NGC. Packed and ready to go should know the results in a week. mike
                image
              • Well mike, unfortunately I didn't drink the PCGS kool-aid this morning, so I still think it'll get an MS-62 even though you sent it to that 2nd class grading service (JUST KIDDING!!!) imageimageimageimageimageimage
              • darktonedarktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
                jtryka- I hope this coin has a happy ending like this one did. Just an old thread that had a happy ending for meimage. mike
              • Sure, I have trouble getting PCGS to grade my modern proofs above PR-66, and you throw that in my face!
              • Remember there are no bad gold coins so don't let me rain on your parade. In this instance I have three 1881 Coronets: one 64+, one 64, and one 63 to use for comparison (NGC coins). Based on what I take to be bag marks-excessive-, dings on surface areas and roughly marked rims it will go no higher than 62 or probably 61 with NGC. PCGS might go fractionally higher and ANACS even a little higher. However I am rethinking my relative opions of the aforementioned services so anything can happen. But I sincerely hope the coin is better than the picture and good luck!!! Let us know.
              • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,530 ✭✭✭✭✭
                Darktone: remember the discussion we had about my $10 Liberty, on this thread, yesterday morning? My coin was an ANACS MS63, but dirty, so I busted it out, (carefully) cleaned it, sent it to PCGS, and got an MS61. I did not expect it to cross at MS63, but I wanted a 62 at least. (All the rest of my gold type set was in 62 at the time- I have now upgraded all but the Liberty coins to MS63.) I was disappointed, but chalked it up to experience, and patted myself on the back for not getting a bodybag. I made the coin look a lot better.

                Anyway, to the point: comparing my coin (a 1901) to yours, I must say that mine has much fewer marks. Yours is of course more original, but I will agree with the previous post that says yours would get a 62 at best, because of the chin ding. Mine has no marks that serious, and is a PCGS MS61. However, they may have net graded mine down a point or two for the light bath I gave it.

                MY COIN, for comparison.

                You will note that there is a faint hairline on the neck that is hardly visible to the naked eye (the scanner shadows enhanced it), and a few brown spots remain on the reverse, near E in UNITED and to the left of the olive branch. I don't know if they are "copper spots" or not; I was able to remove the worst of them with the cleaning. (Diluted Jeweluster and a Q-tip.) Are copper spots removable? I didn't think so.

                Also, do you collect these? Just $10 Libs, or other gold, too?

                I want to upgrade the coin in my picture, plus my MS62 $2.50 and $5.00 Libs in my Regitry set (#6 on 20th C. Gold Major Design) to MS63. I would be interested in trading and/or selling these last MS62's and the MS61 $10 in order to accomplish that upgrade. If anybody has any PCGS $2.50, $5.00, or $10.00 Libs in 63, please let me know. I could trade my old coins plus money or other PCGS coins for yours. And I will try to find the original ANACS MS63 insert for that now-PCGS MS61 1901 $10 Liberty. I don't know if it would cross back to ANACS at the same grade or not, but someone could try.

                Oops, now I've gone and spammed up your thread, talking about my coin instead of yours. Sorry about that. I do think yours is very pretty (what MS Liberty gold isn't?), but I think hoping for anything over 62 from PCGS on it would be a long shot, if only because of that one mark. But you never know. Look at the hairline on the cheek of this No Motto $1 Indian I used to own. It got a 62. I think the hairline was all that held it back from 63 or even 64.

                Your coin certainly has some nice cartwheel luster to it.

                Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
              • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,530 ✭✭✭✭✭
                Say, speaking of facial marks, look at the scuffiness on the cheek of my $20 Lib.. It got a 63 from PCGS, but I suspect double eagles get some forgiveness for being such big, heavy coins, and gold is a soft metal, after all.

                OK, I'll buzz off now. Sorry if I chatted you to death and put links to every corner of the Web. But you can see that gold is a topic dear to my heart.

                Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
              • 1jester1jester Posts: 8,637 ✭✭✭
                Welcome to the Boards, Patosh!

                I agree that there are no bad gold coins. But I sure hate it when I see bent ones!

                imageimageimage
                .....GOD
                image

                "Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you." -Luke 11:9

                "Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD: And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might." -Deut. 6:4-5

                "For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver, the LORD is our king; He will save us." -Isaiah 33:22
              • darktonedarktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
                jtryka- sorry I just thought that was an interesting thread. I hope your proofs do good.image
                  lordmarcovan-that is a nice looking coin. I think the copper spot and the mark on the neck don't hurt the grade too much but it does not look to have much of it's original luster from the picture and that appears to be the difference when going after grades of 63 and up along with clean fields. The copper spot is from improperly mixed alloy of gold with copper( as I am sure you know) As the copper starts to tone it turns brown. Are they removable? no but they can be made less obvious but I would leave it just the way it is. I don't mind copper spots to me it just make the coin look more original. mike image
                • orevilleoreville Posts: 11,953 ✭✭✭✭✭
                  lord: Your 1901 Liberty for very nice for a 61 grade. I prefer that kind of a coin than a ANACS in a 63 slab. The coin screams "potential" in the eyes of a future buyer when it is in rthat 61 holder. If it was in a ANACS holder at 63 it was then a crippled coin for the grade and you must have finally realized.

                  The 1904-S is a lower end 63 for the chatter on the obverse coin but the strike and luster is fabulous which helps the coin along. The plus and minuses.

                  Some will be put off by the chatter others will go for the strike and luster. It is not a coin to crack out since PCGS on a bad day would be more liekley slab it 62 than 64. That is how I define the risk of cracking out.

                  JMHO.

                  Lord: You are learning fast! I have lots to learn too!
                  A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
                • You need to examine it under a hologen lamp. Roll that puppy around and if you still think 64 then maybe you have a shot.
                • lord, that double eagle is by far the worst looking 63 I've ever seen (no offense), I believe the PCGS folks must have taken their Prozac that morning, because the cheek and marks in the upper field are really bad for a 63. Usually they are very tough on 63s in the $20 Lib series, and I think your coin was one of the lucky ones and is definitely the exception, not the rule. Still, there is no bad gold!
                • orevilleoreville Posts: 11,953 ✭✭✭✭✭
                  jtryka: Are you looking at the large sized photo of lords $20 gold piece? You may eant to reduce the size to a size more resembling the size of the coin itself since the really large sized photo tends to exaggerate the amont of chatter on the coin.

                  Not disagreeing that there isn't more than the usual amount chatter for a 63 grade but I do not believe it is quite as bad as you may think.
                  A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
                • Maybe my 1906-S $20 Liberty gold coin might get a MS-63 or more if it compares favorably to your scan. I got it for a bit above the gold bullion price and hopefully, it will be a nice appreciating piece in my collection. image
                  Recommended reading - The PCGS Guide to Coin Grading and Counterfeit Detection and The Coin Collector's Survival Manual and NCI Grading Guide
                  For the Morgan collectors - The Morgan and Peace encyclopedia by Van Allen and Mallis

                  What would your slabbed coins be worth if the grading services went out of business? What would your coins be worth if the Internet was taken offline for good?
                • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,530 ✭✭✭✭✭
                  Normally I claim (truthfully) that my coins look better in person than they do in the scan. Unfortunately, that isn't the case with that 1904-S $20. It really looks that scruffy in person, too. image

                  Definitely not one I would crack out for any reason. But, as oreville said, the strike and luster on it are great. I have never been thrilled with it, but I don't despise it, either.

                  Thank y'all for your opinions, both favorable and unfavorable. I have enjoyed this thread and found it educational. I would be the last to call myself a "gold expert", but I think I have some nice pieces. You didn't see any of the nicer ones in this thread. You saw my more generic, lower-end stuff.

                  Mike- I would definitely call FedEx to task for leaving your envelope in a vulnerable place. I had an expensive gold coin left at my neighbors' house by UPS, once. Fortunately, I had trustworthy neighbors I got along well with. I would rather have had them do what they did than leave it on the front steps. And it was better to walk over to the neighbors than to drive across town to the UPS center to pick it up. The between-the-doors thing that FedEx did might not be the worst, though. We don't have a screen door. I found a box on the corner of my porch steps recently that was wrapped up in the doormat. Thinking my wife had moved the doormat to sweep or something, I ignored it for nearly a week. When I finally discovered it, it had been rained on a few times.

                  Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
                • darktonedarktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
                  NGC has just posted the grade on thier website MS64. This makes me very happy. image

                • That's it, I'm cracking everything out and sending it to NGC! imageimageimageimageimageimageimageimage
                • darktonedarktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
                  jt- this really is a super nice looking coin-no gift grade here. It deserves the grade. I actually think without the rough rim it would go 65. image mike
                • I have no doubt it's a nice coin, I just can't see a 64 with that big ding in the cheek, of course, I have been doing some experiments with photos, and it seems especially on libs, that photos tend to exaggerate the flaws (perhaps the folks at PCGS and NCG should start looking at photos as a supplement to their grading).
                • It looks a lot like many of my MS 63's----people who think the grade is lower are forgetting that gold gets little dings easily, and graders tend to take that into account. In order to get a low MS grade, there would be many more bag marks and ticks.
                • darktone,congrats !!... I was a point off, I'm happy to say image ...Pat
                • tjkilliantjkillian Posts: 5,578 ✭✭✭
                  You guys are too tough on gold! Gold is a very soft metal and both PCGS and NGC know that very well. If it were silver, then I could see a 63, but being gold, I easily see a conservative 64. I have several, freshly-graded gold and they all get higher than expected grades.

                  Tom
                  Tom

                • jomjom Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭✭✭
                  Marcovan: That's a nice 61. The color of the coin looks very nice too. It must have some hairlines if it is in a 61 holder....or they just screwed up. image

                  Darktone: Good for you! It's hard to tell with photos because you tend to just look at the hits and strike. Luster does not show up with in most photos..especially scanners. Just because a coin has hits it can still get a higher grade if the luster kicks butt.

                  jom
                • darktonedarktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
                  Thanks guy's I will post a picture when I get it back. mike
                • darktonedarktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
                  just got it back today.image mike
                    image

                  Leave a Comment

                  BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
                  Emoji
                  Image
                  Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
                  Drop image/file