1965 SMS Jeff - will it cam?
DHeath
Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
Have any of you guys seen many of these coins? I found a nice 1965 today, and I'm not familiar with how much mirror the fields must have to get cam/dcam designation. This coin looks solid cam to me, and the shadow on Monticello is not a frost break, but just a shadow. The devices are very frosty, but I'm used to looking at Kennedys, and the nickels have a soften satin look. How does this one stack up?
Obverse
Reverse
Obverse
Reverse
Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
0
Comments
Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
Oh, you've heard that one before?
Anyway it does look awfully nice and the '65 is way harder than the others. The only thing is the area on the left side of Monticello that looks like weak frost. If it doesn't grade cam for that I would still like the coin. Please keep us posted.
I have a lot of SMS nickels in non-CAM holders that I thought should have made it. Here are obv & rev scans of 3--1 made CAM, the other two did not. The three are in the same order, obv & rev. Answer on which made it later. Editted to add: These look nicer in person than on the scans.
Cameron Kiefer
In my experience they give the nickels a bit of slack compared to the silver coins. Nickel doesn't strike up as well as silver. I've gotten some DCAMs that I was a little surprised (not complaining!) to get.
Greg
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
hey brian, i'm guessing coin number three, the one on the right is the cameo coin, and i'll say MS66CAM. the other two look like they have that sleepy haze which will probably hold back don's coin.
al h.
I couldn't have guessed from the pics, and admit I'm a little suprised by the answer. I guess mine has an outside chance, and I appreciate your post.
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor