Lets Try to Be More Civil--Even to Dealers
CalGold
Posts: 2,608 ✭✭
Let try to keep the rant level down a bit. No one likes dishonest ebay sellers or deceptive practices. But I think it would be valuable to hear more from full-time dealers. The recent rant about cancelled minimum bid auctions led to some posts that appear to have been interpreted by TBT either as personal attacks or as evidence that board participants have a very strong anti-delaer bias. I don't think it is good for the educational value of this board to make dealers feel that their views are unwelcome. Anyone agree or disagree?
0
Comments
To Bryan's credit, he tried to single-handedly defend another dealers actions by explaining how difficult it is to make a living selling coins. In a similar thread on NGC's US coin forum, an anonymous dealer said something to the effect the coin business was the only one in which the buyer had access to greysheet and frequently misused it. Boy is that not true. In my business, everybody and there brother has access to vehicle cost down to shipping. Anyone can go online to Kelly or any number of sites to get trade values etc. Do they frequently misuse this info, you bet! Every customer believes their trade is extra-clean, and if they pay more than wholesale for the dealer's vehicle, they're getting abused. Carmax and several large sellers have proven however that the public will indeed pay a reasonable profit if supplied with adequate information. My disagreement with the auction tactic in question is just a question of business ethics. The community will always vote with their dollars and cause some businesses to thrive and others to fail. Starting a negotiation like an ebay sale by misrepresenting your goods as not having a reserve is simply not good business. Saying so isn't uncivil, and that isn't a personal attack. IMHO
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
-Dan
I was one of the loudest voices on that thread and do not feel I ever personally attacked anyone and I do not have any anti-dealer bias. If you read whats left of the thread (most of what was edited out is still there in other posts that quoted it) I think most will agree it was a very civil discussion. I will not adjust my views of hold my tongue just because someone might not agree and get their feelings hurt. If everyone did that what would be the point of wasting your time here?
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
<< <i>Of course with all of the cowardly editing, one can't know for sure >>
if you missed taking a cheap shot before - you hit it dead on this time.
to all, if TBT violates no rules there is no ethical question to ponder.
I think the people who are disagreeing with TBT are the ones who understand the difference between rules and ethics. That's the point.
-Dan
I had resolved the previous time this subject came up to never comment again. This time I kept it to two sentences. I was still attacked via PM as being a mob member. I won't be commenting again because I don't wish to be attacked non-publicly again.
I absolutely agree with the spirit of this string which I think means to try to keep our comments as civil as possible and not direct them towards individuals but only toward ideas. This I agree with and support. And, I think I can do an even better job of practicing this. However, directing comments toward "dealers who cancel bids early due to low bids" is very different than directing the comments toward:
- an individual
- all dealers
- dealers who cancel due to mistakes
The above listing are "ideas" not individuals. I don't believe it is accurate for someone to come in the middle of a debate and admit to being a member of one of the "ideas" being discussed and then claim that they are being attacked personally. If the idea was being attacked before person admits to a practice.....don't suddenly then call it a personal thing or a thing against dealers. I think coin dealers are some of the best folks I come across and wish I could spend more time with them just to learn absorb and enjoy. I am moving in five days. While my wife is excited about the new house, I'm more excited about meeting the five new coin dealers in the town I'm moving to.
Thanks for letting me ramble. I will constantly try to be more civil on this board. As I said in defending myself in a PM as a member of the "mob", this forum is much more civil on the whole than 99% of the internet forums that I have seen. I appreciate everyone's opinion and don't wish that we turn it into a forum where earnest disagreement is avoided.
particular seller and branched as threads due into a general discussion. I never detected that anyone was
attacked personally beyond the ebay seller e.mix, and I plead guilty to that act. All in all I think this is one
of the more civil discussion boards I have ever participated in.
Scott M
Everything is linear if plotted log-log with a fat magic marker
I'd normally not miss such a thread but I'm at the ANA slaving over hot coins trying to find material to keep all the eager collectors happy so I don't get flamed!
GSAGUY
Link
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
I'll check it out. I'll also have TBT fill in all the details (his side of the story) when he arrives tonight in NYC.....that is, IF he arrives in NYC with all the storms in the area.
With all the bouncing around in the plane, I'll be Bryan's face is going to be colored about like some of those rainbows he sells!
GSAGUY
Bryan got pretty fed up with us. If you see him, tell him we said have a good show! No hard feelings, just an honest disagreement.
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
There are lots of guys from big time dealerships that post here. They use a handle and you just don't know who they are. Might be a good thing.
As to Dog's point, I am not worried about discouraging the sleezy dealers from offering their thoughts, I am concerned about discouraging knowledgable people, whether they be dealers or collectors, from posting for fear of being slammed. I am rather more thick skinned than others, but many people do not feel comfortable in heated debate or in threads filled with intemperate rant (hopefully this piece is not devolving into that). And I think there is a line, though not necessarily a clear one, between heated, passionate debate, and lively discussion.
My only point is to keep things polite, and encourage participation.
This thread is starting to upset me more than the original. "Lets try to be more civil even to dealers" - maybe it should be titled "lets be scared little frightened whimps when the big, benevolent, abused-by-mean-buyers, dealer speaks".
The original thread was both civil and objective. Who was it that used name calling and said those who disagreed were part of a "lynch mob"? I believe it was the poor, abused, has a God-given right to a profit, rules trump ethics, point of view!
Excuse me, I have to leave and go bah, bah like a sheep on the "Those poor, abused, right-to- lie, cheat, and steel - We Feel Sorry for Enron, Global Crossing, WorldCom, .. executuves forum".
Pushkin the Ranting Lynch Mobster
I am not asking anyone to cower to dealers. I certainly don't. They are merchants who sell luxury items, not necessities. We interface with them by our own choosing and chose which ones to do business with and which to shun.
May I respectfully suggest that we may disagree, but only our spouses and our shrinks know for sure whether or not we are defensive and/or insecure.
Pushkin the Defensive, Insecure, Lynch-Mobster
Camelot
<< <i>We interface with them by our own choosing and chose which ones to do business with and which to shun. >>
AND that was the whole point of the other thread......... If dealers practice unethical sales practices like the one in question it pisses us of and thus "We interface with them by our own choosing and chose which ones to do business with and which to shun".
Seeing how the last thread was civil and never personally attacked any board member but was rather an exchange of opinions I only wish I could figure out the point of this thread.
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
Explains why we are sometimes preceived as defensive and insecure (but not mobsters, that assertion really makes me angry).
Charles
<< <i>I think the people who are disagreeing with TBT are the ones who understand the difference between rules and ethics. That's the point. >>
Rules(laws, regs, etc.) and ethics are one in the same. If you don't break the rules no sin is committed. period!
<< <i>4th stooge I will direct these comments to you, first of all its questionable that no rules were broken, but I'll assume you were correct, there are a lot of things we learn from our parents, grandparents teachers, mentors, siblings that aren't written down as rules. There is no rule book in life but there certainly are ethical choices to be made in a lot of things we do and say. Very few businesses will exist very long if they offer to sell something then change their mind when a legitimate offer is on the table. >>
Again, rules are ethics and ethics are the rules. The rest is nothing more than the nicety of customer service. If you don't like the manner in which a merchant conducts their business then don't deal with them.
The underlying current in this thread, imho, is that most of you want the opportunity to 'rip' a deal so you can have some bragging rights and a fat profit margin when you sell.
<< <i>Rules(laws, regs, etc.) and ethics are one in the same. If you don't break the rules no sin is committed. period! >>
Patently false. Rules are what you have to do, ethics are what you choose to do.
rule
n.
1. An authoritative, prescribed direction for conduct, especially one of the regulations
governing procedure in a legislative body or a regulation observed by the players in a game, sport,
or contest.
Keyword is prescribed.
eth·ic
n.
1.
1. A set of principles of right conduct.
Scott M
Everything is linear if plotted log-log with a fat magic marker
<< <i> Car dealers will take more crap from a customer than a coin dealer will. >>
There's usually more money involved.
<< <i>The underlying current in this thread, imho, is that most of you want the opportunity to 'rip' a deal so you can have some bragging rights and a fat profit margin when you sell. >>
No one wants to rip a dealer.
The dealer sets the minimum bid or reserve in the auction. If he does get ripped he has no one to blame but himself.
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
Hey Bill, that's funny!
Come on over ... to The Dark Side!
No buyer on Ebay has the ability to rip a dealer. The dealer sets the minimum bid or reserve in the auction. If he does get ripped he ripped himself and therefore has no one to blame but himself.
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
We don't wear suits anymore, and the funny thing is, if we don't come speak to you, you'll think we're not interested in your business. "What, does this guy think I'm not dressed nice enough to buy his car!". You were correct about the takes more crap part though.
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
BTW - Dog, you're spending entirely too much time looking at cars.
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor