Home U.S. Coin Forum

Question about this slab

Russell12Russell12 Posts: 768 ✭✭✭✭✭

Why is the slab date different from PCGS's Cert Verification site?


Comments

  • RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice catch.
    Plus, the mintage is zero (?)

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,726 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The reason is that the mint has been striking and selling modern versions of these old medals which were issued years ago in larger sizes. This one is too large to go into a normal PCGS slab. I believe that it was struck in the 1950s for a collector who supplied silver to the mint to make it. Usually you see these pieces in bronze. This medal was first issued in 1905 when Theordore Roosevelt was inaugurated for his one elected term.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Russell12Russell12 Posts: 768 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BillJones said:
    The reason is that the mint has been striking and selling modern versions of these old medals which were issued years ago in larger sizes. This one is too large to go into a normal PCGS slab. I believe that it was struck in the 1950s for a collector who supplied silver to the mint to make it. Usually you see these pieces in bronze. This medal was first issued in 1905 when Theordore Roosevelt was inaugurated for his one elected term.

    I don't understand what this has to do with a coin issued in 2013 shows 2014 on it's label.

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,726 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Russell12 said:

    @BillJones said:
    The reason is that the mint has been striking and selling modern versions of these old medals which were issued years ago in larger sizes. This one is too large to go into a normal PCGS slab. I believe that it was struck in the 1950s for a collector who supplied silver to the mint to make it. Usually you see these pieces in bronze. This medal was first issued in 1905 when Theordore Roosevelt was inaugurated for his one elected term.

    I don't understand what this has to do with a coin issued in 2013 shows 2014 on it's label.

    If that’s your question, my short answer is, I don’t know. I have the Theodore Roosevelt Chronicles set, but I have not paid much attention to when it was issued.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • MetroDMetroD Posts: 2,552 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 1, 2026 10:56AM

    I'll make a GUESS. A mistake on the label (i.e., it should be (2013)).

    Here is what the PCGS 'pop report' indicates for #526614 (a variety of #526490):

    Link: https://www.pcgs.com/pop/detail/u-s-mint-medals/794?bsn=526490&sn=526614&p=MS&g=69&ccid=258407

    Edited to Add: And, here is a screenshot from the associated 'coinfacts' page:

    Link: https://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/coin/2013-ar-medal-theodore-roosevelt-matte-finish-chronicles-set/526614/69

    The point - the cert verification, pop report, and coinfacts all say (2013).

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 39,147 ✭✭✭✭✭

    typo

    there was a 2013 coin in the set. even if the medal were delivered in 2014, the set was probably assembled with 2013 struck medals

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file