Home U.S. Coin Forum

1887 Off-Center Brockage Morgan Dollar!

Comments

  • Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That is one cool error coin. I'd love to own it.

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan

  • RampageRampage Posts: 9,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Zoins

    Is that your new addition? It’s wonderful.

  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,819 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Fantastic error – must be a new discovery. I’m not aware of it.
    (was this pictured in the Don Taxay book 50 yrs. Ago?)

    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors
    for PCGS. A 49+-Year PNG Member...A full numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022
  • jfriedm56jfriedm56 Posts: 1,238 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wonder error. I’m sure it’s as rare as hen’s teeth!

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,140 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Double DANG!

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • oldabeintxoldabeintx Posts: 1,919 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not an error guy here, but that is exceptional. Must be extremely rare for a coin that size and that dramatic an error to make it out of the mint.

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 28,325 ✭✭✭✭✭

    😎

  • ByersByers Posts: 1,578 ✭✭✭✭✭
    mikebyers.com Dealer in Major Mint Errors, Die Trials & Patterns - Author of NLG Best World Coin Book World's Greatest Mint Errors - Publisher & Editor of minterrornews.com.
  • ShurkeShurke Posts: 362 ✭✭✭✭

    Absolutely wild!

  • PROMETHIUS88PROMETHIUS88 Posts: 2,885 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 19, 2024 8:45AM

    First off...amazing coin!
    Couple questions on areas that I'm admittedly an extreme novice.
    The 63 seems generous. I'm not at all familiar with grading mint errors. Does seem accurate?
    Also, how does a coin that previously had heavy toning get a straight grade? I would assume some "conservation" was done on this coin as opposed to "cleaning"?

    Thanks for the clarification from the experts!

    Promethius881969@yahoo.com
  • WinLoseWinWinLoseWin Posts: 1,570 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I give it an MS-63 obverse and Negative MS-63 reverse.

    "To Be Esteemed Be Useful" - 1792 Birch Cent --- "I personally think we developed language because of our deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin

  • ByersByers Posts: 1,578 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PROMETHIUS88 said:
    First off...amazing coin!
    Couple questions on areas that I'm admittedly an extreme novice.
    The 63 seems generous. I'm not at all familiar with grading mint errors. Does seem accurate?
    Also, how does a coin that previously had heavy toning get a straight grade? I would assume some "conservation" was done on this coin as opposed to "cleaning"?

    Thanks for the clarification from the experts!

    Tons of coins with very heavy toning are conserved at PCGS and NGC, and straight graded.

    mikebyers.com Dealer in Major Mint Errors, Die Trials & Patterns - Author of NLG Best World Coin Book World's Greatest Mint Errors - Publisher & Editor of minterrornews.com.
  • PROMETHIUS88PROMETHIUS88 Posts: 2,885 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Byers said:

    @PROMETHIUS88 said:
    First off...amazing coin!
    Couple questions on areas that I'm admittedly an extreme novice.
    The 63 seems generous. I'm not at all familiar with grading mint errors. Does seem accurate?
    Also, how does a coin that previously had heavy toning get a straight grade? I would assume some "conservation" was done on this coin as opposed to "cleaning"?

    Thanks for the clarification from the experts!

    Tons of coins with very heavy toning are conserved at PCGS and NGC, and straight graded.

    Yeah, I get that. I had been out of the numismatic hobby for a few years and it was a hard concept to wrap my head around coming back in. On the sports card side of things, "conservation" would be considered altering which is highly frowned upon Within numismatics, art, etc, it is a widely accepted practice.
    I wasn't sure if all conserved coins are straight graded with no reference to the prior conservation. Would make sense if it was somehow referenced on a slab when encapsulated.

    Appreciate the response!

    Promethius881969@yahoo.com
  • jacrispiesjacrispies Posts: 923 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Remarkable! If coins could talk, this one would probably start off with "ouch" then continue with its story.

    @Byers said:
    Mint Error News published this new discovery on Sept 9th in issue 73 of the magazine, and as an article.

    Mint Error News has the exclusive images of the coin raw, prior to being submitted to PCGS. It had very heavy toning.

    https://minterrornews.com/discoveries-9-9-24-pcgs-certifies-1887-morgan-dollar-struck-off-center-with-a-brockage-reverse-ms-63.html

    Is the heavy toning noted in your photos? I see the light toning on the obverse matching the auction photos, but perhaps the reverse (incuse side) is slightly darker on the left half of the unstruck portion. Is that the heavy toning you are referring to?

    "But seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness and all these things shall be added unto you" Matthew 6:33. Young fellow suffering from Bust Half fever.
    BHNC #AN-10
    JRCS #1606

  • ByersByers Posts: 1,578 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jacrispies said:
    Remarkable! If coins could talk, this one would probably start off with "ouch" then continue with its story.

    @Byers said:
    Mint Error News published this new discovery on Sept 9th in issue 73 of the magazine, and as an article.

    Mint Error News has the exclusive images of the coin raw, prior to being submitted to PCGS. It had very heavy toning.

    https://minterrornews.com/discoveries-9-9-24-pcgs-certifies-1887-morgan-dollar-struck-off-center-with-a-brockage-reverse-ms-63.html

    Is the heavy toning noted in your photos? I see the light toning on the obverse matching the auction photos, but perhaps the reverse (incuse side) is slightly darker on the left half of the unstruck portion. Is that the heavy toning you are referring to?

    It was completely original with heavy toning on both sides. The comparison photos side by side show the difference.


    mikebyers.com Dealer in Major Mint Errors, Die Trials & Patterns - Author of NLG Best World Coin Book World's Greatest Mint Errors - Publisher & Editor of minterrornews.com.
  • jacrispiesjacrispies Posts: 923 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Byers
    I don't mean to oppose and defend the coin, I am more curious than anything. I also held this coin raw in hand before certification and the coin looks exactly the same. It looks like a lighting difference between the Stack's photos and your photos. Stack's photos can tend to be bright sometimes, which may add to the change in appearance.

    "But seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness and all these things shall be added unto you" Matthew 6:33. Young fellow suffering from Bust Half fever.
    BHNC #AN-10
    JRCS #1606

  • ByersByers Posts: 1,578 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jacrispies said:
    @Byers
    I don't mean to oppose and defend the coin, I am more curious than anything. I also held this coin raw in hand before certification and the coin looks exactly the same. It looks like a lighting difference between the Stack's photos and your photos. Stack's photos can tend to be bright sometimes, which may add to the change in appearance.

    I have not viewed it in the PCGS holder. Anything is possible. Maybe you are correct.

    mikebyers.com Dealer in Major Mint Errors, Die Trials & Patterns - Author of NLG Best World Coin Book World's Greatest Mint Errors - Publisher & Editor of minterrornews.com.
  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,493 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not that it really matters, but how was this identified as an 1887, rather than an 1887-S or 1887-O?
    I think the holder should read 1887( )
    Again, it doesn't really matter.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,140 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ChrisH821 said:
    Not that it really matters, but how was this identified as an 1887, rather than an 1887-S or 1887-O?
    I think the holder should read 1887( )
    Again, it doesn't really matter.

    Good question. VAM variety perhaps?

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 19,963 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There's a non-zero chance the mint could be attributed from the date. There are several repunched and misplaced dates in 1887 that could indicate which mint made it.

  • OverdateOverdate Posts: 7,008 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @messydesk said:
    There's a non-zero chance the mint could be attributed from the date. There are several repunched and misplaced dates in 1887 that could indicate which mint made it.

    I like to think it's the one and only 1887-CC.

    My Adolph A. Weinman signature :)

  • RobertScotLoverRobertScotLover Posts: 940 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Flippin phenomenal Morgan error

  • EXOJUNKIEEXOJUNKIE Posts: 1,616 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm addicted to exonumia ... it is numismatic crack!

    ANA LM

    USAF Retired — 34 years of active military service! 🇺🇸
  • ShurkeShurke Posts: 362 ✭✭✭✭

    I’m just checking up on my error knowledge here.

    So for this coin occur, there had to be two consecutive, nearly identical off center strikes, right? The first one became a die cap, which then struck the coin we’re all admiring here.

    Have I got that correct?

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,140 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Overdate said:

    @messydesk said:
    There's a non-zero chance the mint could be attributed from the date. There are several repunched and misplaced dates in 1887 that could indicate which mint made it.

    I like to think it's the one and only 1887-CC.

    Ali will have them next week.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,140 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 20, 2024 8:12AM

    @Shurke said:
    I’m just checking up on my error knowledge here.

    So for this coin occur, there had to be two consecutive, nearly identical off center strikes, right? The first one became a die cap, which then struck the coin we’re all admiring here.

    Have I got that correct?

    No. The first strike is normal, centered between the dies, but the coin did not exit the dies. The second planchet came in partly overlapping the first coin, and directly underneath the part of the obverse die that struck the area being covered, and the obverse die descended, striking this coin between part of the obverse die and the corresponding part of the previously struck coin. The previously struck coin sank the covered part of its design into the second coin.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • ShurkeShurke Posts: 362 ✭✭✭✭

    @CaptHenway

    Thanks for the explanation, much appreciated! Guess that shows how much work my error knowledge needs.

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,140 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @EXOJUNKIE said:

    Sounds cheap!

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,255 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If you know your series well, it’s pretty easy to identify the mint of most coins without flipping them over to see the mintmark, and it’s even easier with mint state coins. In the case of this brockage, I think any Morgan Dollar expert would instantly know it’s a Philly product.

    Also, I saw the coin in hand and don’t think the toning has been lightened in any way. Maybe some residue was removed and that affected the look - I don’t know about that - but the toning and luster seemed very natural.

    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • ByersByers Posts: 1,578 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 20, 2024 10:21AM

    @MrEureka said:
    If you know your series well, it’s pretty easy to identify the mint of most coins without flipping them over to see the mintmark, and it’s even easier with mint state coins. In the case of this brockage, I think any Morgan Dollar expert would instantly know it’s a Philly product.

    Also, I saw the coin in hand and don’t think the toning has been lightened in any way. Maybe some residue was removed and that affected the look - I don’t know about that - but the toning and luster seemed very natural.

    Andy- a distinction needs to be made between ‘coin in hand’ and ‘slab in hand’.

    I saw the coin in hand, you saw the slab in hand.

    Only SB saw the coin in hand and the slab in hand.

    You state that “ I saw the coin in hand and don’t think the toning has been lightened in any way”.

    So does it look like the Mint Error News image or the SB image, with the slab in your hand???

    mikebyers.com Dealer in Major Mint Errors, Die Trials & Patterns - Author of NLG Best World Coin Book World's Greatest Mint Errors - Publisher & Editor of minterrornews.com.
  • ByersByers Posts: 1,578 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CaptHenway said:

    @EXOJUNKIE said:

    Sounds cheap!

    Yes!

    My guess was 100k.

    mikebyers.com Dealer in Major Mint Errors, Die Trials & Patterns - Author of NLG Best World Coin Book World's Greatest Mint Errors - Publisher & Editor of minterrornews.com.
  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,255 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Byers said:

    @MrEureka said:
    If you know your series well, it’s pretty easy to identify the mint of most coins without flipping them over to see the mintmark, and it’s even easier with mint state coins. In the case of this brockage, I think any Morgan Dollar expert would instantly know it’s a Philly product.

    Also, I saw the coin in hand and don’t think the toning has been lightened in any way. Maybe some residue was removed and that affected the look - I don’t know about that - but the toning and luster seemed very natural.

    Andy- a distinction needs to be made between ‘coin in hand’ and ‘slab in hand’.

    I saw the coin in hand, you saw the slab in hand.

    Only SB saw the coin in hand and the slab in hand.

    You state that “ I saw the coin in hand and don’t think the toning has been lightened in any way”.

    So does it look like the Mint Error News image or the SB image, with the slab in your hand???

    Correct. I never saw the coin out of the holder. Anyway, I think the coin looks most like the PCGS photo above.

    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • ByersByers Posts: 1,578 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It’s definitely an amazing mint error!

    mikebyers.com Dealer in Major Mint Errors, Die Trials & Patterns - Author of NLG Best World Coin Book World's Greatest Mint Errors - Publisher & Editor of minterrornews.com.
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,140 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Byers said:
    It’s definitely an amazing mint error!

    Absolutely!

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • jt88jt88 Posts: 3,002 ✭✭✭✭✭

    WOW, nice mint error. I think every collector should has some kind of mint error in his/her collection.

  • jt88jt88 Posts: 3,002 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 20, 2024 1:42PM

    US mint error always gets the top dollar compared to other country’s mint error. This gold coin sold for 18k this month at ha. If is US or Chinese coin it should be 100k or higher

  • lilolmelilolme Posts: 2,654 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not sure it helps but I put together the pictures a little better. The Mint error news one is not as refined and I think a little out of focus(?).

    Here are MEN and TV and then TV and Stacks (these two are more similar but can note some lighting type shifting).



    .
    .

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=_KWVk0XeB9o - Ruby Starr (from 'Go Jim Dandy') Piece Of My Heart
    .
    https://youtube.com/watch?v=D0FPxuQv2ns - Ruby Starr (from 'Go Jim Dandy') Maybe I'm Amazed

    RLJ 1958 - 2023

  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 19,963 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MrEureka said:
    If you know your series well, it’s pretty easy to identify the mint of most coins without flipping them over to see the mintmark, and it’s even easier with mint state coins. In the case of this brockage, I think any Morgan Dollar expert would instantly know it’s a Philly product.

    All I can tell myself is that it's not flashy enough for an S coin. Regarding strike, all bets are off when you're dealing with errors. Anyone looking for a 45 Mercury dime with full bands that opts for a broadstrike will attest to that.

  • ByersByers Posts: 1,578 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jt88 said:
    US mint error always gets the top dollar compared to other country’s mint error. This gold coin sold for 18k this month at ha. If is US or Chinese coin it should be 100k or higher

    It’s the furthest known off center KR. I have handled a 5% off-center, (2) broadstrucks and (2) partial collars. But this one blows away everything else!

    mikebyers.com Dealer in Major Mint Errors, Die Trials & Patterns - Author of NLG Best World Coin Book World's Greatest Mint Errors - Publisher & Editor of minterrornews.com.
  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,115 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Amazing coin and wonderful result! I'm glad our hosts and @homerunhall like like it!

    Great article from Mint Error News, Mike @Byers ! Love the tracking of other Morgan off centers in the article!

    And wonderful Krugerrand @jt88! Amazing to see one so OC in gold!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file