Those look like scratches marks, as opposed to slide marks, to me.
can't slide marks cause scratches if the slide is opened and closed enough times? (With the help of sand or dirt, etc.)
I don’t know but I don’t recall having seen slide marks that looked like that. I also give the benefit of the doubt to NGC, who’s seen plenty of slide marks and examined the coin in hand.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
When I tried to give a grade based on the Tru-view that you posted I saw it as a 62; however, after seeing the larger pics posted here after your reveal I believe the details grade is certainly warranted.
Some times they just don’t like a coin and find a reason, the surfaces alone preclude a straight grade (imho) but they didn’t want to call it altered. Marks work well enough without getting political. Wasn’t good enough for the 62 net it might have gotten in the 90s
Comments
Seems a bit tough of NGC to put that in a details holder.
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
Darn, I missed the rub marks.
Here is one with similar slide marks that graded 65. Yes, they are less pronounced than yours but slide marks nonetheless.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/375533992118
https://www.ngccoin.com/certlookup/3811937-004/65/
Collector, occasional seller
Those look like scratches, as opposed to slide marks, to me.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
can't slide marks cause scratches if the slide is opened and closed enough times? (With the help of sand or dirt, etc.)
I don’t know but I don’t recall having seen slide marks that looked like that. I also give the benefit of the doubt to NGC, who’s seen plenty of slide marks and examined the coin in hand.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Here's a short gif of the Obverse (it's not great but it'll do for now)
When I tried to give a grade based on the Tru-view that you posted I saw it as a 62; however, after seeing the larger pics posted here after your reveal I believe the details grade is certainly warranted.
The scratches look much worse in the slab shot pic. I can now see why it got a details grade. Still a decent coin if you got it for the right price.
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
Some times they just don’t like a coin and find a reason, the surfaces alone preclude a straight grade (imho) but they didn’t want to call it altered. Marks work well enough without getting political. Wasn’t good enough for the 62 net it might have gotten in the 90s
11.5$ Southern Dollars, The little “Big Easy” set
Are the vertical (approximately) striations in the fields in front and behind Liberty suggestive of cleaning?
Casual collector, mostly Morgans & Peace Dollars.
No, as those are Die file lines
Thanks @johnhenry9009 Does this coin obverse appear cleaned or are these also die polish lines? thanks!
Casual collector, mostly Morgans & Peace Dollars.
That 09-S appears to have a mix of die polishing lines and metal flow markings so no. It does not look cleaned from the photo.