Home U.S. Coin Forum

GTG: 1861-S Quarter Eagle - CACG - GRADE REVEALED

REALGATORREALGATOR Posts: 2,622 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited July 3, 2024 3:18AM in U.S. Coin Forum

Any thoughts on the grade of this scarce Quarter Eagle? Reveal posted after the guesses.

«1

Comments

  • Mr_SpudMr_Spud Posts: 5,831 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58

    Mr_Spud

  • lermishlermish Posts: 3,212 ✭✭✭✭✭

    55+

  • CrepidoderaCrepidodera Posts: 390 ✭✭✭✭✭

    45/50

  • LukeMarshallLukeMarshall Posts: 1,986 ✭✭✭✭✭

    53 with a Nice image

    It's all about what the people want...

  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 4,041 ✭✭✭✭✭

    XF45, if it had enough luster I could see it in a 50 holder but I love it as an XF45.

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • Manifest_DestinyManifest_Destiny Posts: 6,899 ✭✭✭✭✭

  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,215 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 2, 2024 7:17AM

    Edited: from 55 to 53, once I noticed the coin was graded by CACG.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll venture 53 as no objectionable marks, some lustre around devices under the toning with very nice rims (I like to look here as well since they are relatively broad and obviously flat - subject to hits and damage...The field to right of bust is a bit wonky but maybe some planchet issues?? I suspect head, talons & wings on reverse as well as Lib's curls to obverse victims of soft striking & bit of friction on top of that.

    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,589 ✭✭✭✭✭

    50.

  • skier07skier07 Posts: 4,058 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’ll go with 45. The obverse looks 50-55ish while the reverse brings the grade down with the wear on the head, wings, and talons.

  • Davidk7Davidk7 Posts: 370 ✭✭✭✭
    edited July 2, 2024 7:14AM
    1. Maybe a 53 on a friday

    Collector of Capped Bust Halves, SLQ's, Commems, and random cool stuff! @davidv_numismatics on Instagram

  • jfriedm56jfriedm56 Posts: 1,353 ✭✭✭✭✭

    50

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,428 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU50 Nice surfaces and color.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • privatecoinprivatecoin Posts: 3,488 ✭✭✭✭✭

    55

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • gumby1234gumby1234 Posts: 5,589 ✭✭✭✭✭

    45 sounds right

    Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM

  • CRHer700CRHer700 Posts: 2,043 ✭✭✭✭✭

    45+

    God bless all who believe in him. Do unto others what you expect to be done to you. Dubbed a "Committee Secret Agent" by @mr1931S on 7/23/24. Founding member of CU Anti-Troll League since 9/24/24.

  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,639 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @291fifth said:
    AU50 Nice surfaces and color.

    I concur.

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,169 ✭✭✭✭✭

    53

  • Project NumismaticsProject Numismatics Posts: 1,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    50

  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 1,958 ✭✭✭✭✭

    45/50

  • 45

  • TonedeafTonedeaf Posts: 244 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm in for 53. I like the color!

    Tonedeaf is a nickname given to me in reference to my guitar playing ability.

  • breakdownbreakdown Posts: 2,190 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My initial thought was 55.

    "Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.

  • Jacques_LoungecoqueJacques_Loungecoque Posts: 733 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 2, 2024 12:58PM

    XF Details?

    edit to add: I know jack squat about gold.

    Having fun while switching things up and focusing on a next level PCGS slabbed 1950+ type set, while still looking for great examples for the 7070.

  • ShurkeShurke Posts: 440 ✭✭✭✭

    My gut reaction was 55.

  • OnlyGoldIsMoneyOnlyGoldIsMoney Posts: 3,380 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The 1861-S $2.50 can be quite difficult to find, especially with CAC approval.

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 28,567 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Au 53, fwiw

  • marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,309 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow I love it, 53 here.

  • breakdownbreakdown Posts: 2,190 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @OnlyGoldIsMoney said:
    The 1861-S $2.50 can be quite difficult to find, especially with CAC approval.

    An ominous thought from a guy that would know. Details grade bet just jumped on DraftKings.

    "Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.

  • JJMJJM Posts: 8,039 ✭✭✭✭✭

    53

    👍BST's erickso1,cone10,MICHAELDIXON,TennesseeDave,p8nt,jmdm1194,RWW,robkool,Ahrensdad,Timbuk3,Downtown1974,bigjpst,mustanggt,Yorkshireman,idratherbgardening,SurfinxHI,derryb,masscrew,Walkerguy21D,MJ1927,sniocsu,Coll3tor,doubleeagle07,luciobar1980,PerryHall,SNMAM,mbcoin,liefgold,keyman64,maprince230,TorinoCobra71,RB1026,Weiss,LukeMarshall,Wingsrule,Silveryfire, pointfivezero,IKE1964,AL410, Tdec1000, AnkurJ,guitarwes,Type2,Bp777,jfoot113,JWP,mattniss,dantheman984,jclovescoins,Collectorcoins,Weather11am,Namvet69,kansasman,Bruce7789,ADG,Larrob37,Waverly
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @breakdown said:

    @OnlyGoldIsMoney said:
    The 1861-S $2.50 can be quite difficult to find, especially with CAC approval.

    An ominous thought from a guy that would know. Details grade bet just jumped on DraftKings.

    At the risk of putting my foot in my mouth, I’ll take some straight-grade action.😬

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • lermishlermish Posts: 3,212 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @breakdown said:

    @OnlyGoldIsMoney said:
    The 1861-S $2.50 can be quite difficult to find, especially with CAC approval.

    An ominous thought from a guy that would know. Details grade bet just jumped on DraftKings.

    At the risk of putting my foot in my mouth, I’ll take some straight-grade action.😬

    Hey again!

    ;) Just teasing, I would bet on it also <3

  • goldengolden Posts: 9,789 ✭✭✭✭✭

    50 here.

  • raysrays Posts: 2,403 ✭✭✭✭✭

    55

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lermish said:

    @MFeld said:

    @breakdown said:

    @OnlyGoldIsMoney said:
    The 1861-S $2.50 can be quite difficult to find, especially with CAC approval.

    An ominous thought from a guy that would know. Details grade bet just jumped on DraftKings.

    At the risk of putting my foot in my mouth, I’ll take some straight-grade action.😬

    Hey again!

    ;) Just teasing, I would bet on it also <3

    I was teasing, too, but I would be very surprised if the coin received a details-grade.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,589 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice date as well as coin. PCGS survivors in all grades estimates 85.

  • markelman1125markelman1125 Posts: 1,858 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Au 55

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,348 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Technical 53/45, probably net 50.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • ColoradoCoinGuyColoradoCoinGuy Posts: 219 ✭✭✭

    Don't see much luster in the photo so would say XF45.
    But if there is some luster that is not showing in the photo, then I would say AU53.

    Member of LSCC, EAC, Fly-In Club, BCCS
    Life member of ANA
  • KiwiNumiKiwiNumi Posts: 149 ✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    Edited: from 55 to 53, once I noticed the coin was graded by CACG.

    I've never submitted to CACG, but from what I've seen online, they seem to be fair with numeric grading. I tend to agree with their grades, but the big problem I see is that they give details grades to coins that don't deserve it.

  • johnnybjohnnyb Posts: 40 ✭✭✭

    Forget the number grade, that coin looks original and beautiful regardless of number and would look great in any collection. I’d give it a 50 but can easily see it higher.

  • JonBrand83JonBrand83 Posts: 481 ✭✭✭✭✭

    nice 50

    Jb-rarities.com
    IG: jb_rarities

  • spyglassdesignspyglassdesign Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Coin is beautiful. 53 would be my guess!

  • hummingbird_coinshummingbird_coins Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Could not decide between 53 and 55 so I will say 53+.

    Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
    Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled

  • alaura22alaura22 Posts: 3,275 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • TPRCTPRC Posts: 3,794 ✭✭✭✭✭

    55

    Tom

  • DisneyFanDisneyFan Posts: 2,156 ✭✭✭✭✭

    XF45. A really nice clean coin. The reverse seems a little worn. Tiny rim nick at 9:00 on the obverse.

  • REALGATORREALGATOR Posts: 2,622 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Well someone here almost figured it out but no one said "Cleaned". Under a halogen lamp there are no hairlines or any signs of being wiped. I do believe the coin was dipped in something to remove dirt but the surfaces don't look disturbed. It really seems like CAC is trying to become the new "OGH". CACG Numeric grades are tough and I mostly agree with them but some really nice coins are getting passed over. I was expecting a 45 or 50 but got this lump of coal instead.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file