Mystery Coins (Errors or what?)
Numismaphile
Posts: 25 ✭
This cent weighs 1.7 grams. Both PCGS and NGC returned it as "counterfeit" and "damaged to resemble error". I was thinking it was on an underweight planchet. I can understand if it was created to look that way, but how do you "damage" a cent to make it thinner but still have detail? The latter designation makes no sense to me.
Likewise, the prussian piece is a mirror-image of what I think was a 19th century 10-mark piece. Again, the "damaged to resemble error" designation mystifies me. How does one turn a coin inside out? NGC offered to take another look but before throwing any more time and expense at these I thought I'd invite your opinions.
Thank you.
Tagged:
0
Comments
Indian cent:acid treated?
Acid treatment.
The Indian Head cent is acid-treated. That is pretty clear. Submerging a coin in acid will reduce its weight yet yield something with reasonably intact details. I did this many, many times in various labs (though not to IHCs) and they all looked like your coin.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
First coin: guessing it's a counterfeit that someone soaked in acid to try to hide the counterfeit tells, and/or make it look like a thin planchet. Or at least that's what the TPGs are assuming.
The second "coin" is Austrian, not Prussian. Specifically, an Austrian 10 kreuzer 1872. Though it's a squeeze-job counterfeit: take two normal coins, and a piece of blank metal between them, and squeeze the sandwich in a vise. Quickest and cheapest way to make a circulating counterfeit. The "error" it resembles is a brockage, but it's impossible to create a "double-brockage" like this as a genuine mint error.
Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius, "Meditations"
Apparently I have been awarded one DPOTD.
what a shame yo do that to a coin
There's no mystery. This is why it pays to run things past the forum before spending money on a submission.