Strange Quarter
SOHimself
Posts: 18 ✭
Hello. I'm new here. I've been reading posts on this forum for a while. I find most of them fascinating. Thanks for having me. I'm wondering if anybody can tell me what I'm looking at here. I'm a novice for sure, but from what I could tell it's possibly some sort of damage that happened when it was struck. I'm not sure though at all. I haven't seen much out there regarding this type of thing, although I have seen some.
Tagged:
0
Comments
Oh heck did no pictures come through. I'm sorry. Let me fix that if I can.
Oh Jeepers I know I'm blowing it here. I'm having a hard time getting the images up.
Still trying. I'm usually better at this.
And:
Interesting coin. I don't think this is post mint damage so you might have something worth a bit. Can you post some pictures of the obverse and more pictures of the reverse from different angles?
For future reference, if you want to edit your post you can always click on the gear icon to the right of your username in your post/comment.
Howdy and welcome. Your images are actually pretty good. I will let others chime in regarding the coin.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Uhg
Tom B, thank you very much!
Sorry. TomB.
KiwiNumi, Yes. Thank you. I'll get right on that.
I have to take some pictures. I found this in my pocket. I thought it looked odd.
And thank you for the tip about the gear icon for editing too.
I will post the different angles tomorrow. It's almost 11:00 p.m. where I am. It'll be easier in the morning and with the daylight. Thanks so much for taking the time to help me.
.
The obverse looks like a normal circulated quarter.
The reverse appears to have some raised areas in the upper center.
My first guess is that these are something like glue, since there are no corresponding depressed areas on the obverse.
Looks to me like the coin has been exposed to heat, causing the outer clad layer to separate and bubble up.
“some sort of damage that happened when it was struck”
First of all, if it happened when it was struck, it would be an error, not damage.
What you have is a damaged coin caused by heat expanding the two layers of the quarter.
This is considered damage and adds no value to the coin.
As others have said ... heat damage after it left the mint. No collector value.
Yep, high heat. Fire, or maybe a blowtorch. The heat causes microscopic gas bubbles between the clad layers to expand literally like a balloon, stretching the metal that had been softened by the heat.
It's a fairly standard appearance for heat-damaged clad coins.
Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius, "Meditations"
Apparently I have been awarded one DPOTD.
This would be my guess. Heat damage.
It's definitely not a minting error.
Here are more pics.
Oh ok. Thank you. Wouldn't the color look different?
I asked Nova, an ai, if a coin was likely to have die failure damage on one side and not affect the other side. And I know that it may just be a generic answer. But that's what got me interested in this particular coin in the first place. Here's what it said:
It's definitely possible for a coin to have a minting error that affects only one side. This can happen for several reasons:
These types of errors are relatively common in coin production, and they can make the affected coins quite valuable to collectors.
Let me know if you'd like to know more about coin collecting or specific types of minting errors!
This message has been generated by Nova -
I did not mean to give Nova a promotional link that was just in the bottom of the message that I pasted in. I apologize. Okay never mind. I edited it out. And I don't know how or if I can delete posts that are obsolete.
Try to envisioned the minting process. If that lump was on the planchet when struck then the die would never have reached the surface to strike up the design.
If it was a void in the die then it would look very different (such as you see with major cuds).
My bad. Yes, thank you for clarifying the difference between error and damage. I knew but I wasn't using my head. Thanks again.
So I googled "heat damaged clad coins," and clicked on images. I have to admit some of those look somewhat similar. But wouldn't the heat damage coin be more likely to be damaged on both sides? It seems to me like an error could be on one side only.
An error can be on one side only. Heat damage can be on one side only.
All sorts of things CAN be on one side only. The fact that it's on one side only has no bearing on whether it's an error or not.
@JBK made the comment that matters:
Yeah, heat can do that kind of damage
Mr_Spud
No, heat damage can just as easily be on only one side only.
It's not enough to say that it is an error by default. You need to explain how it could have occurred in the minting process.
I just pulled this coin out and took fresh photos, 2 are orig. and 2 are edited with filters.
I can't be sure of it's demise but it sure shows an image that I would like to compare with yours.
On the reverse of mine there is distortion present, along with other factors on both sides
I'm working on other projects at this time so I hope this helps with your questions. Save it.
They meet.
Seriously... @Manifest_Destiny - you make the best memes here! I really do enjoy them.
I am a newer collector (started April 2020), and I primarily focus on U.S. Half Cents and Type Coins. Early copper is my favorite.
Just the facts Bubba, just the facts.
The trail I'll follow is showing in the date space provided.
When I have time, right now I'm playing horseshoes.
At a glance.. there is, a common denominator on both coins (his and mine).
Go figure ?
Please do not post messages generated in whole or part by stochastic parrots.
ANA 50 year/Life Member (now "Emeritus")
Yes there is, I believe others are right, the common denominator is heat damage.
Torch job. Seen a ton of em.
RIP Mom- 1932-2012