@Meltdown said:
I can see I need to take worse photos... you guys are strict!
“Worse photos” or better ones? Either way, we can only go by what we see. The coin looks like a 63 to me, though based on your post, it sounds like it graded higher.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
God bless all who believe in him. Do unto others what you expect to be done to you. Dubbed a "Committee Secret Agent" by @mr1931S on 7/23/24. Founding member of CU Anti-Troll League since 9/24/24.
@Meltdown said:
I can see I need to take worse photos... you guys are strict!
“Worse photos” or better ones? Either way, we can only go by what we see. The coin looks like a 63 to me, though based on your post, it sounds like it graded higher.
One of those... my problem is the previous posts are pretty accurate. It's graded a 62 but in hand I like it as a 63+.
My pics show off the nicks & ticks pretty well, so I guess it is about what it says on the slab.
Lovely generation 3 holder, and a nice coin. I think NGC got this one perfectly at MS62 but CC Morgans tend to get some leeway in the grading room and I would not have been surprised at MS63.
@coinbuf said:
Lovely generation 3 holder, and a nice coin. I think NGC got this one perfectly at MS62 but CC Morgans tend to get some leeway in the grading room and I would not have been surprised at MS63.
That's exactly my thinking... yesterdays accurate grade gave way to today's generous 1 point extra on CC Morgans. A gold CAC sticker would match that reverse hologram nicely. I might just give it a shot.
I would have said MS-63. As an MS-62, if you got it for that price, it was a really good buy.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Really nice coin, seems like a lock 63 today. With that said, it would only gold bean if JA and co see it as 63+ or higher. Undoubtedly deserving of the green without question.
I think the coin is no better than a 62, and even at that I think it only has about a 2/3 chance of a green cac sticker. Sorry but this a pass coin for me.
Collecting the CC Morgan date set is a decent project. Before you start using resources, develop an understanding of the series and establish expectations that are reasonable. Before you send the 1881-cc off to CAC, take a moment and think about the resources and whether those resources would be better utilized to obtain the objective of completing a CC M set. The 81-cc you have is fine... and they are easily obtainable at the 62-63-64 and 65 level. A sticker is nice for those that need it... but it is not needed at this grade.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
I put 62 (above). I don’t know if dipping would get the black stuff off / working it w dip soaked q tip might help. I would not waste money on trying work with it or sticker with it. The coin is not PQ lol. No sticker is going to overcome the dark toning. It’s a C coin. Don’t see it stickering. I would blow it out on the bay, record the loss in the sales journal, put that money somewhere else. Stay away from the darkly tarnished toners (ugly coins). They get worse over time.
From a contact mark basis it’s a 62 anyway imo. X mark on cheek. Face really scuffy. Put the money in a slabbed MS69 2024 1oz Britannia. Sold a bunch of them at recent show.
@coinkat said:
Collecting the CC Morgan date set is a decent project. Before you start using resources, develop an understanding of the series and establish expectations that are reasonable. Before you send the 1881-cc off to CAC, take a moment and think about the resources and whether those resources would be better utilized to obtain the objective of completing a CC M set. The 81-cc you have is fine... and they are easily obtainable at the 62-63-64 and 65 level. A sticker is nice for those that need it... but it is not needed at this grade.
@coinkat said:
Collecting the CC Morgan date set is a decent project. Before you start using resources, develop an understanding of the series and establish expectations that are reasonable. Before you send the 1881-cc off to CAC, take a moment and think about the resources and whether those resources would be better utilized to obtain the objective of completing a CC M set. The 81-cc you have is fine... and they are easily obtainable at the 62-63-64 and 65 level. A sticker is nice for those that need it... but it is not needed at this grade.
Somehow I think spending one hundred dollars trying to sticker the coin will not adversely affect the OPs ability to complete a CC Morgan set. Send the coin to CAC if you so desire.
Comments
MS63
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
MS62
MS62. Just not there for me for 63
I can see I need to take worse photos... you guys are strict!
Click on this link to see my ebay listings.
“Worse photos” or better ones? Either way, we can only go by what we see. The coin looks like a 63 to me, though based on your post, it sounds like it graded higher.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I would call it a 63.
Collector
75 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 45 members and counting!
instagram.com/klnumismatics
63
God bless all who believe in him. Do unto others what you expect to be done to you. Dubbed a "Committee Secret Agent" by @mr1931S on 7/23/24. Founding member of CU Anti-Troll League since 9/24/24.
One of those... my problem is the previous posts are pretty accurate. It's graded a 62 but in hand I like it as a 63+.
My pics show off the nicks & ticks pretty well, so I guess it is about what it says on the slab.
Click on this link to see my ebay listings.
Well, here you go. You guys got me. It's got some schmuck on the obverse, It would really benefit from an acetone bath.
.
Click on this link to see my ebay listings.
Got here late, but would have guessed 63 due to the face being so marked and no higher.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
Looks like I'm late also but would've went with 62, borderline 63.
My Original Song Written to my late wife-"Plus other original music by me"
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8A11CC8CC6093D80
https://n1m.com/bobbysmith1
Yeah, I'm not one to drag out the guess the grade fun... It annoys me when I look through others and 3 pages later, still no grade posted.
Click on this link to see my ebay listings.
Lovely generation 3 holder, and a nice coin. I think NGC got this one perfectly at MS62 but CC Morgans tend to get some leeway in the grading room and I would not have been surprised at MS63.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
That's exactly my thinking... yesterdays accurate grade gave way to today's generous 1 point extra on CC Morgans. A gold CAC sticker would match that reverse hologram nicely. I might just give it a shot.
Click on this link to see my ebay listings.
I'd send it to cac. A totally original Unc. with typical bag marks.
It has great strike detail and eye appeal. The chatter lends to its originality. I can see an upgrade by a point.( if I close one eye ).
The coin is fine as it is. And it should stay that way. The spread between grades at this level for this date is not really worth the effort.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
I would have said MS-63. As an MS-62, if you got it for that price, it was a really good buy.
I too thought 63.
bob
If I'm not careful, I may have to collect the whole run. I've now got the 78, 81, 84, 85 & 90.
Click on this link to see my ebay listings.
Hopefully, you meant that the coin has some “schmutz” (as opposed to “schmuck”) on the obverse, 😉
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I would have guessed 63. Nice fatty pickup!
Nice NGC 3.0, coin is nice too. Would 63 today, but sells for 63 money in that holder as is, I bet.
"It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."
A nice 62
Collector, occasional seller
Really nice coin, seems like a lock 63 today. With that said, it would only gold bean if JA and co see it as 63+ or higher. Undoubtedly deserving of the green without question.
Very nice one incl the holder
Cool coin and I love that slab!
My YouTube Channel
I think the coin is no better than a 62, and even at that I think it only has about a 2/3 chance of a green cac sticker. Sorry but this a pass coin for me.
It's in an older NGC holder. Would probably grade MS63 today imo.
I appreciate all the comments. I will send it to CAC and let you all know how ot turns out.
Click on this link to see my ebay listings.
Collecting the CC Morgan date set is a decent project. Before you start using resources, develop an understanding of the series and establish expectations that are reasonable. Before you send the 1881-cc off to CAC, take a moment and think about the resources and whether those resources would be better utilized to obtain the objective of completing a CC M set. The 81-cc you have is fine... and they are easily obtainable at the 62-63-64 and 65 level. A sticker is nice for those that need it... but it is not needed at this grade.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
I put 62 (above). I don’t know if dipping would get the black stuff off / working it w dip soaked q tip might help. I would not waste money on trying work with it or sticker with it. The coin is not PQ lol. No sticker is going to overcome the dark toning. It’s a C coin. Don’t see it stickering. I would blow it out on the bay, record the loss in the sales journal, put that money somewhere else. Stay away from the darkly tarnished toners (ugly coins). They get worse over time.
From a contact mark basis it’s a 62 anyway imo. X mark on cheek. Face really scuffy. Put the money in a slabbed MS69 2024 1oz Britannia. Sold a bunch of them at recent show.
I would have guessed 63. Good luck with CAC!
https://www.the4thcoin.com
https://www.ebay.com/str/thefourthcoin
+1.
USAF (Ret.) 1985 - 2005. E-4B Aircraft Maintenance Crew Chief and Contracting Officer.
My current Registry sets:
✓ Everyman Mint State Carson City Morgan Dollars (1878 – 1893)
✓ Everyman Mint State Lincoln Cents (1909 – 1958)
✓ Morgan Dollar GSA Hoard (1878 – 1891)
63
62/63
Somehow I think spending one hundred dollars trying to sticker the coin will not adversely affect the OPs ability to complete a CC Morgan set. Send the coin to CAC if you so desire.
EXCELLENT!!! In a NO LINE FATTIE with the NGC LOGO in FULL on the back!! "MONEY COIN" all around!
TC71