Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

NEWP: GTG 1884 (P) Morgan Dollar

ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited April 15, 2024 2:20PM in U.S. Coin Forum

Just received this OGH PCGS Morgan. It is in a DMPL holder but it is probably PL or even Semi-PL. I'm not asking you guys to weigh in on that as it's too hard from photos. What about the number grade?

Comments

  • Options
    dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS64 PL.
    Could even be 65 - would need to see it in-hand to be sure.

  • Options
    ajaanajaan Posts: 17,140 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64 OGH


    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 12,150 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Tell us about the cloudy areas on the reverse at STA in STATES and IN GOD in the motto.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    Tell us about the cloudy areas on the reverse at STA in STATES and IN GOD in the motto.

    It looks worse in the picture than in person, but it is that typical "white fog" you notice on these sometimes. You can only notice it when it catches the light just right.

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 12,150 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ProofCollection said:

    @MFeld said:
    Tell us about the cloudy areas on the reverse at STA in STATES and IN GOD in the motto.

    It looks worse in the picture than in person, but it is that typical "white fog" you notice on these sometimes. You can only notice it when it catches the light just right.

    Thank you. In that case, I’ll guess MS65 PL. If it weren’t present, I’d go 66 or 66+.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    DeplorableDanDeplorableDan Posts: 2,638 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like an easy 5pl to me

  • Options
    Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 934 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll go with 66

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA

  • Options
    LeeBoneLeeBone Posts: 4,324 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65

  • Options
    jfriedm56jfriedm56 Posts: 869 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Good looking 65.

  • Options
    ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭

    -- REVEAL --

    Yep, I think it's a 65 all day long with how clean the devices and fields are. DMPL, probably not though.
    There's pretty good price increase from 64DMPL to 65DMPL ($1350 --> $4500). I think I will send this in for reconsideration.

  • Options
    Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 934 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That cheek looks like a nice puffy cloud.
    I like it alot.

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA

  • Options
    LeeBoneLeeBone Posts: 4,324 ✭✭✭✭✭

    From the pics provided, not crossing at DMPL.
    Nice coin though :)

  • Options
    ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @LeeBone said:
    From the pics provided, not crossing at DMPL.
    Nice coin though :)

    It's already in a PCGS holder. No need to cross.

  • Options
    LeeBoneLeeBone Posts: 4,324 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I meant upgrade to 5DMPL

  • Options
    coinkatcoinkat Posts: 22,828 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Based on the slab, I suspect this one was graded about 30 years ago (+/- a few years but no more than 3-4).

    I like the coin... 65PL seems reasonable and perhaps 65DMPL is reasonable. My point is that obtaining a DMPL grade at that time had a greater probability than today. If this were resubmitted, it seems the end result might be disappointing. I would consider a CAC opinion if that is still a thing. I would do that before a reconsideration based on the slab and when I suspect it was graded.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • Options
    ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coinkat said:
    Based on the slab, I suspect this one was graded about 30 years ago (+/- a few years but no more than 3-4).

    I like the coin... 65PL seems reasonable and perhaps 65DMPL is reasonable. My point is that obtaining a DMPL grade at that time had a greater probability than today. If this were resubmitted, it seems the end result might be disappointing. I would consider a CAC opinion if that is still a thing. I would do that before a reconsideration based on the slab and when I suspect it was graded.

    CAC won't sticker it for not being DMPL. I don't know for sure, but that's usually the case.

    @LeeBone said:
    I meant upgrade to 5DMPL

    PCGS will not down downgrade the designation unless they want to make a payout under the guarantee, and they don't want to make a payout.

  • Options
    LeeBoneLeeBone Posts: 4,324 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Reconsideration will get you to a 65PL IMO.
    I would leave it alone.
    Doesn't hurt to try though...

  • Options
    LuxorLuxor Posts: 415 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very nice looking for an 84-P, I like it!

    Your hobby is supposed to be your therapy, not the reason you need it.

  • Options
    ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • Options
    Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 934 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Solid strike on that Morgan. I watched the video. That is a very nice coin.

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file